Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 70
  • 5
    33
  • 4
    19
  • 3
    6
  • 2
    4
  • 1
    8

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Reliable purchase, guaranteed to be a good purchase.

Bought Goodyear Efficiencient Grip Performance 205/55 r16 94W for Civic 4d instead of Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE002. Riding on the Breeches caused discomfort due to its rigidity, especially on granular asphalt, while the skin resonated, which was annoying, even the soundproofing made did not really help. Changed to Goodyear, chose exactly 94w, which are made in Germany. So soft that when you close the door, the body sways. But they are comfortable, driving on granular asphalt has become…

Pros
  • Comfort, low noise
Cons
  • Lack of confidence in maneuvers

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Excellent product, the best quality.

I took a set in the dimension 205/60 R16 with indices 92V. Made in Slovenia. Auto - Toyota Corolla e150. Before that, there were regular Dunlop SP 01 Sport 205/55 R16. For my car, this tire size is not standard, but everything fit into the arches, nothing snorts. After a tough Dunlop, these Goodyear tires are a fairy tale. The noise from the front wheel arches disappeared, most of the small pits and road joints stopped giving back to the body. And most importantly, in Hong Kong, almost all…

Pros
  • Soft, light, not afraid of ruts. Excellent handling and braking in the rain and on dry pavement. It does not slip, but immediately breaks off.
Cons
  • For me, they don't exist.

The driving style is calm, the car is toyota auris. These tires are much more comfortable to ride. If you are looking for soft quality tires, Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 205/55 R16 91V is for you. But the soft sidewall was really weak. So if the roads are bad, it is better to choose something stronger. I have considered: Pirelli Cinturato P7 Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Michelin Primacy 3

Pros
  • Soft, comfortable (for me, these parameters are the most important) Good balance of features Handling on wet pavement low rolling resistance, Quiet.
Cons
  • The continuation of the advantages is a soft (weak) sidewall. Departed 2 weeks. An hour ago I drove into a deep hole (at a speed of 20 km/h). As a result, a double side cut. Repair 1200 rub. Conclusion for the roads of my city, these tires are not suitable :(

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I recommend to buy, the product is of high quality.

Comment for size 205/60R16 for Suzuki SX4, because for other sizes and brands, the experience may be quite different. I changed the base "oak" Bridgestone Turanza ER300 205 / 60R16, which served 7 years, for the same size. The sidewall is softer than that of Bridgestone, and other Koreans and Japanese, but tougher than Nokian and Continental, I specifically checked different brands in the store. Now on speed bumps there is no feeling that fillings will fly out of the teeth, it feels quieter…

Pros
  • Excellent combination of price and quality. Excellent handling in water-filled ruts, because I changed it just before the showers in Hong Kong in the summer of 2022, and I managed to appreciate it, now you don’t need to get out of the rut when it rains where it’s drier, you fly into a puddle at 100 km / h and there is no yaw, they hold it perfectly. marking "INSIDE - OUTSITE" for correct installation.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

A practical product, nothing to complain about.

Previously, I usually chose UHP class tires, put up with stiffness and noise, just to steer. With age, priorities change, I decided to try something more comfortable. But the difference is a little more than we would like) Everything seems to be very good, reliable and cool. But the feeling that you are riding on a layer of jelly does not leave. Unfortunately, because of this, sometimes you start to trust the car a little less, although the tires have never failed, but you feel their behavior…

Pros
  • Comfort is my respect. Good hydroplaning resistance.
Cons
  • "Wadded" controllability

Revainrating 3 out of 5

The product can be used, I expected a little more.

Has some pros: Holds the road well in dry conditions and is quite comfortable Got cons: Very weak sidewall! I drive carefully, but there are already hernias on each tire, and on one there are already two! For 28 years of experience, I have not seen this!

Replaced turanza t001 97v In comparison with turanza t001: softer, quieter on smooth pavement and about the same on rough pavement only low-frequency background, less sharp steering, better trajectory on the track, worse appearance (turanza looks more hot and sporty) Addendum: By chance, I had to sell the rubber, put back the regular Turanza t001 (Mazda 6 2022 car), and this is what I immediately noticed: Taxiing on a Turanza is much better On the Turanza, the car drives flat without…

Pros
  • good smoothness, quiet on smooth pavement, holds well in corners at high speeds, good directional stability on the track, in size 225/55 17 manufacturer only Germany, with indexes 101 V better hernia / shock resistance compared to other sizes
Cons
  • in the comment

Revainrating 1 out of 5

The product is not good, I will not buy any more.

For 2 months, 2 new tires for disposal. It's a shame that after the first one I bought another one. The pits were small and at a speed of 60 km / h at the most. The size can be both small and narrow 195/55/16. I did not listen to reviews of the same, but without the word performance. Manufacturer Germany. Pressure 2.2 constantly checked. I drove very carefully. In general, please take into account my review.

Pros
  • Aquaplaning, low noise, handling.
Cons
  • sidewalls

Revainrating 4 out of 5

No complaints, I recommend to buy.

Used in aggressive mode, Renault Duster car, average speed 120 km/h, traveled 60,000 km in 1.5 years, worn out on the indicators, does not float, holds the road very well. I will most likely change to her.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am amazed at how well made the product is, just magical!

I skated the first season on them (city, a lot of intercity). Of course, the advantage is the price / quality ratio - not as expensive as, for example, the Michelin, which I drove before, but I haven’t felt the difference yet - both tires are good. Slightly quieter than Michelin. They ride well on the water on the track (as long as the tread drains water well). They brake quickly. My tires are made in Poland, there are no complaints about the quality of workmanship. They write that the…

Pros
  • Price, brakes well, seems to be quiet
Cons
  • Very soft