Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 53
  • 5
    35
  • 4
    9
  • 3
    5
  • 2
    3
  • 1
    1

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I was surprised by the quality for the price.

I bought the wheels on 02/26/2023. Price at the time of purchase. amazon. 5235. Rub. for the wheel. 205.552022. Production, China. Date of manufacture 2022. 3 years ago I already bought such tires Hancock Vertus Prime, 3. Only made in Hungary, they passed without problems. 80000 km. Soft, strong, wear-resistant, was satisfied. That's why I took it. Only 3 years ago the price was higher by 500 per tire. Taking into account inflation, I was surprised that the price is lower, I think this is due…

Pros
  • Caps
Cons
  • Made in China.

I took this rubber because of the "low" noise (according to reviews). In the end, in general, satisfied. I would not say that the noise level is very low, most importantly, this noise / sound does not bother at all, at any speed, even on coarse-grained asphalt. Before that, there were Bridgestone Dueler H / P Sport 215 / 65R16 - this is really noisy and hard rubber (it’s awesomely strong), but the noise was unbearable, I’m very glad that I finally changed it. Machine - what 2022 j10.

Pros
  • Comfortable noise.
Cons
  • After a run of 1000 km, there are no shortcomings.

It's time to replace the old tires with new ones. Auto Daewoo Gentra. According to the book, 195/55 p15 is written, which actually stood. The tires were Continental ContiPremiumContact2. I was afraid that this one would not fit, but after studying auto forums I decided to buy this size, and this particular brand for durability. And yes, everything is ok, nothing rubs anywhere, the car drives gently at 195/65 rather than at 195/55x, as if it has become higher, and quiet tires, and the…

Pros
  • Comfort, quietness, swallowing small bumps
Cons
  • Not yet

I took tires in size 215/50 r16 for Ford Focus 3. I compare it with michelin primacy 3 and energy saver and the comparison is for the better. At first, there were no complaints about the Michelins primacy (I rode them mainly), except for a terrible noise, but after 50 thousand they began to catch a rut, there was more noise and, in general, behavior on the road began to strain. For a very long time I chose rubber for a replacement and eventually settled on a hankook. I was struck by the reduced

Pros
  • machine behavior, relatively quiet, drains water normally
Cons
  • not found

Tire size 205/55 R16 91h made in Korea 2022 year of release. For lovers of active and aggressive driving, I think they will not be suitable because of the roll on sharp turns and possibly excessive softness, but for those who move smoothly and calmly (this is just about me) - the option is suitable and will definitely please! This is definitely what I was looking for. Let's see how strong their sidewall is, because our roads leave much to be desired and how tire characteristics will change with

Pros
  • Soft, comfortable, quite quiet tires for a quiet measured ride.
Cons
  • Some rolling on corners due to soft sidewall (expected), a kind of rough whistle when driving at a speed of 40-60 km per hour (maybe it will pass when they roll in)

Revainrating 3 out of 5

There are pros and cons, think before buying.

Comparing Ventus Prime 3 with MICHELIN Pilot Sport 4 and Hankook K435 Kinergy Eco 2 all in the same size and on the same machine. After watching magazine tests and reading reviews, I took Ventus Prime 3 instead of Michelin, but was disappointed and returned back after a season :) The nature of the car changed, taxiing no longer brought pleasure, with an increase in speed, the ride became uncertain, slipped from dry to puddle, and did not give a margin for emergency braking. In turns, the speed…

Pros
  • Economical, good rolling, quiet, one of the lightest among competitors, the rubber compound looks solid
Cons
  • Did not live up to expectations, more in the comments.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great value for money, one of the best offers.

Ran 600 km. The tire is excellent, it doesn’t catch a rut, it keeps the road confidently, in the rain the handling is very good (at 100 km / h in a turn without problems). I chose according to two parameters: resistance to hernias and hydroplaning. I did not expect that it is so quiet, compared to the past Michelin Primacy HP, these are just silent. Moreover, noiselessness is revealed on a country road at a speed of > 90 km / h. There is a suspicion that the tire has poor wear resistance…

Pros
  • Confidently hold a wet road. Doesn't catch a rut. Quiet. Strong sidewall.
Cons
  • After 100 km, when the factory layer was erased, it looked as if it had passed more than one season. Although the tread height hasn't changed, it's just an effect due to the pattern.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Good product, I recommend that you try it.

Rubber on a solid four! In view of the low price category, it deserves more appreciation, but the declared indicators are such that the fact does not meet all expectations. There will be something to add, I will add later) Pros below: After winter tires, fuel consumption dropped. Silence when driving on a normal canvas. On dead roads it goes moderately softly, and does not float, this is at 205 to 55)) I liked it. Price quality. I agree that it’s not the cheapest rubber, but it pulls quite well

Revainrating 3 out of 5

A little bit not what I expected, generally fine.

In general, if you operate the car only in the city in turtle mode, then you can choose it. And if you like to frolic in the stream sometimes, then this rubber is not for you at all. This rubber 235 / 45r18 was included with the car, so I think there is no doubt in its originality. For myself, I put an end to the company hankook. Before that, I used hakka black tires and for me it is ideal soft, quiet, holds the road very well, accelerates to 235 km / h, and hankook unfortunately behaves…

Pros
  • There is nothing to praise for, perhaps only for strength, but I didn’t get into strong pits either, mileage 25 thousand in 11 months. Rubber is suitable for people who do not accelerate more than 130 km. H and operate in the city.
Cons
  • 1) Emergency braking is terrible 2) At the start, the rubber grinds up to 3rd gear 3) After 160 km / h, it does not hold 4) at medium speed in corners it does not hold at all, it goes into a skid

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Not perfect quality, there is a small defect.

Previously used Michelin, Nokia, Goodyear products, the winner of tire tests, which left only positive impressions. Maybe it was necessary to ride on domestic and Chinese tires in order to feel the benefits of the Koreans? . or is the hankuk so loud and wooden exactly in 17 inches? Different pros: A high place in the Autoreview test, positive user reviews and a price of about 7 instead of 9 from competitors left no doubt in choosing new summer tires. Handling and economy were top notch. Despite

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The right product for me, there were no problems.

I chose tires according to reviews of real buyers, I realized that in this price range, this is the best rubber in terms of price / quality / performance ratio. Never ridden a Hankook before, very satisfied. Quiet compared to previous Bridgestone Turanza tyres. Time will tell on wear resistance, but according to reviews everything is fine. Bought in Mosavtoshina.

Pros
  • Price Very quiet
Cons
  • Not yet

Look, this is some kind of aquaplaning forum. Is everyone constantly aquaplaning that they write this in the reviews? This is generally a one-time situation. In general, I'm not such a hydroplaning specialist, so I'll just say it (read above). Different pros: Good brand, they make decent wheels in their price range. The previous car also had Hankooks and I changed them to Hankooks. The new one had Continental, but there were certain problems, a hernia got out, but I decided not to overpay and…