Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
hoover 4010100y microfiltration 1703 canister logo

Hoover 4010100Y Microfiltration 1703 Canister Review

8

·

Poor

Revainrating 2.5 out of 5  
Rating 
2.5
🧹 Vacuum Parts & Accessories, 🧹 Vacuums & Floor Care

View on AmazonView on ЯM

Media

(1)
img 1 attached to Hoover 4010100Y Microfiltration 1703 Canister

Description of Hoover 4010100Y Microfiltration 1703 Canister

Microfiltration bag for Hoover canister. Designed for high filtration of common household allergens. Fits hoover upright vacuums, including the windtunnel uprights, that use type Y or type Z bags. Type Y allergen filtration.

Reviews

Global ratings 8
  • 5
    3
  • 4
    0
  • 3
    0
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    5

Type of review

Revainrating 1 out of 5

You will not receive Hoover bags

According to other buyers, this is a replacement of an item for a lure. I don't know if the bags are bad or not but they are not the Hoover brands that I ordered.

Pros
  • . All right!
Cons
  • There are defects

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Vacuum Bags

These bags are factory recommended for the vacuum I have. I can't buy this bag locally. The replacement bags limit suction so I was happy to get these bags. Order beats search every day.

Pros
  • Hard wearing surface
Cons
  • Infinitely slow

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Look no further these bags are perfect

These Y vacuum cleaner bags are Y-est type Ys type. Look no further. Got it. I put one in my Hoover wind tunnel and it practically vacuumed my living room** That's not true at all.

Pros
  • Few competitors
Cons
  • No mold required

Revainrating 1 out of 5

No Hoover bags - Received Envirocare instead

The product image on Revain is of a genuine Hoover product but I received Envirocare bags. This 3-pack of Envirocare weighs 3.8 oz, while the 3-pack of original Hoover Y-bags weighs 4.2 oz (in other words, real Hoover bags are over 10% heavier). Whatever it is, it's not the same as real Hoover bags.

Pros
  • Best in Niche
Cons
  • Zero

Revainrating 1 out of 5

I'm a Hoover retiree. Hoover is always packed.

I am a retired employee of Hoover. Hoover always packed three cleaning bags in a bag. I assumed I would receive three packages. To my knowledge, Hoover has never sold a single cleaning bag. So three cleaning bags for three euros each I find very, very expensive. I would not order additional cleaning bags.

Pros
  • handsome
Cons
  • embarrassed

Revainrating 1 out of 5

not what i ordered!

I specially ordered Type Y Allergen Filter Bags as shown in the picture on Amazon website. I kept my previous bag to make sure I order this one. When I received my order this morning I discovered they are counterfeit filter bags, I don't know what brand they are as they weren't in their own bag. I'm not very happy when a company sends me something that isn't what they advertise. .

Pros
  • Not only useful for its intended purpose
Cons
  • Not fashionable

Revainrating 1 out of 5

Fake brand sent instead

Instead of the Hoover branded vacuum bags I ordered, I received (fake) Hoover vacuum bags from EnviroCare Technologies. These bags do not have the same anti-allergy filtration as original Hoover bags. The image online shows Hoover vacuum cleaner bags, even though they sent a fake brand. I called Revain about this and they refunded my money. From other customer reviews I've read, many customers receive imitation brands. If this happens to you, please call Revane so it ends eventually.

Pros
  • Large selection
Cons
  • Neutral

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Vacuum Y-bags

I have ordered replacement Hoover Y-bags for my Hoover vacuum. They cost a little more than some regular Y bags, but I thought it was worth buying the manufacturer's bags to ensure a good fit. The bag hole attaches to the vacuum cleaner port and the bag must have a straight 90 degree bend to fit into the housing. The previous non-Hoover made bag seemed to fit poorly and some debris collected in the vacuum without reaching the bag. I haven't encountered this problem since I've had these Hoover…

Pros
  • Confident
Cons
  • Something's wrong