Low shoes Salomon, demi-season, high Review

Overall, these are quite nice boots. However, for such a low price, you get a service life of one and a half seasons for boots manufactured by a well-known brand. Below are some advantages: Very easy to carry about and comfortable. Avoid getting the leg wet because it breathes. Having this drawback: They perform very poorly on ice terrain, similar to very inexpensive sneakers. At the point where it folded over the sole, the rubber band developed a crack.

They were easy to slip on and secure with laces. legs that are well-guarded. The model did a fantastic job. Assuming the same quality, I would definitely buy new ones right now. They are not extremely warm; at temperatures below -10 degrees Fahrenheit, they begin to sweat. Pluses: I've had my pair of Salomon B 52 hards for over seven years now, and they're still going strong. After 5 years, the leather one still looked great, but the backdrop needed to be hemmed. After three years of modest…

This was unexpected. It appears that the lone production technology has undergone significant alteration. Salomon shoes used to be an option for me because I wear a large size. With the exception of friction-induced abrasions on the top of the foot, the crosses I've owned for more than 7 years (and won't let my wife throw away) are perfect. They don't even flinch. The latest batches appear to have a tighter sole, yet they are not wearable in slush and just marginally better on ice. The leg…

Has some pros: Warm, comfortable, in winter just a pleasure to be on your feet. Different cons: The top of the material gets dirty, you need to wipe it periodically.