Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 31
  • 5
    23
  • 4
    2
  • 3
    4
  • 2
    1
  • 1
    1

Type of review

Revainrating 3 out of 5

There are disadvantages, but the product is usable.

I have a 215/55R18 95H M+S AWD crossover. For a long time I chose something inexpensive in the standard size with a tread at least slightly different from a purely highway one. Sometimes I drive on primers, including wet ones, and I consider AT tires to be overkill. While I drove about 3000 km, I didn’t climb into the mud, primers, sand goes well. Small stones get stuck in the tread. Manageability, let's say, is normal - it seemed that it was slightly late in corners. I have not yet caught…

Pros
  • Good value for money Silent on good smooth pavement Does not thump at joints, wells / manholes, passes gently Collar for disc protection
Cons
  • Harsh (low profile?) Noisy on medium quality and lower asphalt It seemed that the ABS kicked in too early.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Reliable purchase, guaranteed to be a good one.

The model is very good. Especially during the rain liked the behavior in the puddles. At first, I didn't even understand what was happening. Dueler prowled the waterways and puddles at the entrance. This one hardly notices. It is clear that in deep water there are other impressions, but what happens in rainy weather in autumn on city and country roads is very good. I did not expect such a positive result from this rubber.

Pros
  • The main advantage is the price. At first she caused concern, but everything went away with the installation on the car. Before that, there was a Dueler Bridgstone, this is the standard for the American market for Toyota. Car Toyota Venza 2022, wheels 245X55X19. The next advantage is low noise on a variety of surfaces. Bridge got his howl. And the third advantage is good handling on a water film and in ruts with water. Practically not noticeable.
Cons
  • For two and a half months at the end of the year did not reveal anything serious. It can be a little harsh, with a sharp "gas" there is a slight slip.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

A good product at a good price, I advise you to try it.

I must say right away that the driving style is not aggressive, but sometimes I like to lay in a turn, and here it does not show itself very well. Suitable for normal driving. I drove through the mud, it drives better than it looks, but the car has four-wheel drive, locks, and plus an imitation of electronic locks. Would you take it again? Well, I expected more, so it's hard to say. This is my first Chinese rubber, before it was always Japanese. I think next time I'll pay more and buy Japan. By

Pros
  • Mileage 30 thousand on them, it seems that they have not even been erased. They stand in the regular dimension 215/55/17 on the Subaru Outback b13. Clay does not notice at all, he eats evenly. Steering response is excellent for such a budget tire. Hydroplaning is not noticed up to 140 km/h.
Cons
  • Well, the first thing I didn’t like when buying was not a very deep tread, compared to other manufacturers, but since it is stated that it is long-playing, I didn’t focus on this. After a run of 15 thousand tires became noticeably noisier on different types of asphalt and harder. It is also noticed that above +20 degrees the rubber holds the road normally and below +4 is also normal. But in the range of +4 + 20, well, mediocre, just as wet at this temperature is not so hot. On the yakohama that stood before it, it never forced stabilization systems and other things to work in the summer. It also happened in corners and during emergency braking.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Wonderful quality, one hundred percent satisfied!

I took rubber in 2022 in April, for 2 seasons, minus the winter mileage, I drove about 28,000. The wear resistance is excellent, we can say that it has not been erased at all, and what they write about it is really quiet, comfortable in terms of price-quality ratio, the coefficient will be higher than even Michelin, just Michelin is a brand that means top marks for these indicators, I mean wear, comfort and noise. I took for 4130 and Michelin then cost 8500. So it can be worse because firstly…

Pros
  • Wear resistance, comfort, noiselessness, low price
Cons
  • did not reveal

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I didn't expect the quality to be so high.

Some pros: I tried premium tires of famous expensive companies !. MAXXIS Bravo HP- M3 is beyond competition in all respects! . The best tires in existence. Some cons: There are no shortcomings. Who needs a lot of weights when balancing, check your rims or your hands are crooked at a tire fitting ! .

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am one hundred percent satisfied with the purchase, I recommend this product to everyone.

My manufacturer is Made in China if anyone cares. We now have central dry roads, but the periphery is still in spring ice + porridge in the afternoon, it rides well, maybe. because Outback, I don’t know, but the rubber is marked M-S. On the old Yokohama (regular Subarovska) after 100 km / h there is a rumble, noise . I sinned on the windshields that are glued on the doors, I wanted to take them off, but now I noticed 160 km / h and there are no such noises! 👍 The car rides softer than on a…

Pros
  • Advantages - this is of course the price! Low noise, holds puddles and manages well. Balances well ~ 30g/wheel
Cons
  • Haven't revealed yet.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am amazed at how well the product is made, just magically!

Some pros: I was bribed by the price and reviews, I believed it. Passability and stopping distance are normal. Cons below: The noise is noticeable and on the highway it delivers discomfort, on bends I don’t feel connected with the road, it seems to me that the trajectory floats away.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I was surprised by the quality for this price.

It's time to change your summer tires. Chose a long time, about a month. MAXXIS Bravo HP-M3. Chose according to the following parameters: - wear resistance; - confident driving on wet roads and not prone to aquaplaning; -price. Everything seems to match. I took 6412x4 = 25648. Some pros: Just purchased. I looked carefully, I didn’t find any shortcomings. I installed it right away (tire service is free). At the tire fitting, they put weights of 10 each, they said that the rubber was good. The…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great quality, happy with it one hundred percent!

I looked and chose tires for a long time, at first I wanted to buy tires of the famous Bridge brands, but then after reading the current reviews, I felt like taking it. MAXIS was already on another car and was happy with it, there were no problems. Now I have already skated about 2022 km on this rubber and I am quite satisfied. Road holding is excellent, perfectly balanced, if there is a track, it still behaves a little peculiar, but much better than Continental, but not up to Hankook. On wet…

Pros
  • Probably the best value for money
Cons
  • As such, did not find

Revainrating 5 out of 5

One of the best offers, glad I bought it.

I spent a little time before buying to study the history of the manufacturer. From experience I know about the growth in the quality of Chinese goods, so the dimension 235 65 17 for 4320 apiece was bought without a doubt. Balanced no worse than brands. The tires ran very smoothly on the machine. I wanted to buy a second set for another car - I didn’t have time, everything was swept away, and the new batch was already almost 5,000 per wheel. I'll think about it.

Pros
  • Definitely value for money, soft composition, so quiet, good universal tread pattern. For city driving, it’s the most, clocked up to 140 - no surprises.
Cons
  • I can’t evaluate the strength and wear resistance - there are no statistics yet, but I suspect that the rubber will last for 2, maximum 3 seasons or no more than 40 thousand km due to the soft composition of the rubber. Yes, and according to the test of a well-known printed publication, this was the only big minus of this model.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A great option for this money, I definitely recommend it!

There are no competitors for this price. Michelin or Nokian is twice as expensive. Yes, and the 2022 manufacturer, except for Hong Kong, seems to follow the technology at random. These tires show that the material is really high quality. No pores, castings. The whole drawing is even. You can say there are no wear markers, but you can see it anyway. I walked on the gravel several times, the pebbles get stuck, but not for long, they don’t hit the body. I hope they last a long time.

Pros
  • I studied the market for a long time until I saw reviews about this tire . Tire 265/65 R17 index H. I doubted the correctness of the decision, since the manufacturer is from the Middle Kingdom . But I got a little acquainted with the manufacturer's company. (Produces bicycle tires for short tracks). And not far from Thailand with natural rubber . I decided to buy it. The sides are hard, which is good, the rubber itself is soft, supple. There are marks for balancing. Issue 1 week 2022. It is also good. The pattern is not directional, and the load index is 112, which is almost 1300 kg per wheel . Prado 150 (2900 kg) perceived the wheels as native. Manageability is beyond praise. The first 20 km you can hear the tread, the next day, did not even notice that the food. Very quiet and at the right pressure - soft . Look near the driver's seat on the sticker, what pressure the factory recommends to you . and everything will be ok! I recommend. The tire is light, and the car understood this, it rolls easily, it is not necessary to accelerate with effort.
Cons
  • At first I was confused by the smell of rubber, a little shade of synthetics . There is no such thing at Bridgestone. Assembling the tire not from halves, but by sectors, visually strained. But when installing and balancing, doubts were gone . All 4 wheels were balanced in different ways. 0-30, 40-40, 10-20, 40-50. But without optimization. It could have been brought to zero.