I shot with a staff member, I didn’t understand why I bought a SLR at all. I wanted to sell, but I decided to try the USSR lens, and away we go .)) the advantage of removable lenses was revealed .) I learned to focus manually so that I even manage to focus birds on the fly on a 300 mm lens)

Pros: As an amateur from grade 5, completely satisfied. The only thing is the lack of good autofocus, as in cheaper models of the same Nikon - L120 which shoot video much better and more convenient than the Nikon D3100. there is no exposure bracketing - a trifle, but unpleasant, and there is no way to select several focus points I need, for example 3 or 5. An 18-105 mm lens is the same in length as an 18-55 mm lens, so an 18-1055 lens is optimal when buying a non-body. It comes with a sun shade

I apologize to Nikon camera lovers, maybe later I will change my mind, but now I am not happy with the money spent Its pros: I’ll make a reservation right away, I bought it recently, before that I shot the Canon PS A610, which was accidentally drowned in Greece. Looks good, everything seems to be comfortable. Cons below: For some reason, the buttons on the camera for $ 1000 dangle to the left of the screen, this is certainly not terrible, but somehow it’s not serious. When shooting in an…

I love Nikon for high-quality DSLRs, thank you! Pros below: I've been using this product for over a year now and I'm very happy with it! Easy to manage, pleases with its quality, despite the kit lens. Every time you can find something new in it, but everything is simple and clear. He copes with all the tasks and manages to follow my train of thought, as a result I get what I want to see. The battery holds a charge for a very long time, even in the cold. When there are two sticks left, it is…

And yet, this is Nikon and it has its own fans who like the ergonomics of this camera, its color reproduction, Nikon quality. Do not forget that this is a budget camera and it corresponds to this title by 100%. If you want to be creative, then this camera will help you, it will allow you to get nice photos that are not available to many soap dishes, but . soon you may want to get more functionality available in cameras that are many times more expensive (d7000, d7100, d600). In general, I am…

Excellent camera. For a beginner, this is generally a godsend! Take it, I advise everyone ! Some pros: Design; simple control; clear menu; high sharpness; fast focus; very light and compact; stabilizer works well; Kitovskiy lens pleased; excellent image quality; copes with distortion; there is a "GUIDE" mode - it's like a hint mode, for those who do not understand what they are doing at all (I used it myself for the first two days); the battery holds a charge for a long time, while the charging

In any case, it will shoot better than any soap dish, even if the soap dish is more expensive. 1) Among the entry-level DSLRs, it seemed to me, by and large, D90, D3100, D3200, D5100, etc. they shoot about the same)) It makes sense to spend more money on DX cameras only if you want to buy a D7000 and higher. 2) In terms of ease of use - the d3100 can be forgiven for the inconvenience of grip and the need to climb into the menu, due to its weight and size, it is smaller and lighter than all…

I am satisfied with the purchase, I have never shot a video, the whale suits me for now, I need to take a fix, the quality of the photo suits 100%, I used it in different conditions (except for extreme sports). I try not to use the flash, the ISO is really working. I recommend to buy. With its pros. 1) matrix, no noise. 2) work speed, photo speed 3) build quality 4) shutter sound Cons: 1) the presence of video (why?) 2) cap without lace 3) somehow too plastic

I am very pleased with the camera. For an initial acquaintance with a DSLR - that's it. Over time, I grew out of it, feeling the need for other values ​​\u200b\u200bof high silent ISO, and when a lens without auto-focus appeared (manually focusing is still not very handy). Some pros: * SLR, with all the ensuing consequences * Relatively compact and lightweight * There are both automatic modes and advanced ones - you can gradually grow. At the same time, the manual mode is quite convenient…

In my opinion, a good camera, accurate color balance, perfectly shoots at night without a flash. I was pleased with the gyroscope, I did not think that I would see it in a reflex camera. But the lens needs to be changed, the regular one is completely sad With its pros. Built-in image corrector, fast work with huge photos (the computer opens and saves them more slowly), wide range of light sensitivity, easy to understand and assemble the camera for the first time without instructions Its cons…

I clicked it for only a couple of days, after the Canon 450D it’s very unusual Its pros: good color reproduction, quiet shutter operation, low noise, excellent video quality, fast AF in Live View. The weight is slightly more than that of the 450D, less chance of blurring the frame. Its cons: no auto bracketing, not very convenient control, unnecessary operating modes and photosensitivity, the 55mm kit is terribly soapy, the battery is fixed only with a flimsy cover, too small for my hand. The…

If you take it for home, then it’s 100% suitable, if you want a higher level, then take Canon better, since there are much more additional equipment for it and, most importantly, it’s cheaper. I wanted to buy a fast lens for my Nikon when I saw a similar one from Canon , then the price difference was very decent in the region of 5000. I changed my mind. I looked in Krasnodar and I don’t do advertising. For those who doubt, look in Photo. Ru and in photoplus.

In general, I am satisfied with the device. He pointed out the most disgusting in the shortcomings. I've been using it for a little over a month. I highly recommend buying a camera bag. Its pros: + Convenient semi-professional camera + Support for large memory cards (up to 64GB) +FullHD video (1920x1080) +Easy navigation and interface + Fast battery recharge (1.5-2 hours) + Long battery life (but the flash consumes quite a lot of power) +Built-in (simple) image editor +Live view mode…

I bought it on 09/03/11 and I am very pleased with it: for such a price (17 tr) it could not be better. You get great photos at any time of the day and in any light, the main thing is not to forget about the flash in order to avoid blurring and not raise the ISO, since the pictures in low light come out very noisy. When shooting at shutter speeds of more than 5-10 seconds on a tripod with the VR stabilizer on, the photos are blurry; disabling the stabilizer completely solves this problem.

I recommend it to everyone. There was a desire to delete all the pictures taken on the soap box. Has pros: Nikon. Price. Image quality. Build quality. Functional. Bought in November, satisfied to the point of snot. It shoots well even on a whale lens. I took it with two whales One 18-55 VR another 55-300VR. After the soap dish, the difference is huge. I am a beginner and I can’t really judge the correctly set apertures, but the quality of the pictures personally pleases me. At first the…

In general, I am satisfied with the device. For the money, a digital sony alpha nex-5 would be a good alternative. Let not a mirror, but the matrix is ​​the same. Canon 550d costs 10 more expensive, it has only a motor in the device and a rotary screen. I don't see any other advantage in it. Different pros: good camera for a beginner. Before that there was a soap dish, I thought it would be impossible to take a photo through the viewfinder. Now, after using it for about two months, I realized…

Nikon D3100 is an excellent camera for its class at a perfectly reasonable price. From the D3100 you get everything that a modern entry-level DSLR can offer: a high-quality picture, shooting FullHD video, good performance of all camera systems, as well as a few nice bonuses in the form of convenient controls and a “smart” GUIDE shooting assistant. Has some pros 1) Good, for an entry-level camera, autofocus and metering work. 2) Nice GUIDE shooting assistance mode. 3) Excellent camera…

this is my first DSLR, I was rushing between NIKON and CANON, but when I saw the most popular entry-level budget models Cenon EOS 600D and Nikon D3100 live, I realized what I needed, light, compact, easy to use, Very large functionality for a budget entry-level model level, I got a complete set with lenses 18-55, without a stub and a telephoto 55-200 with a stub, a crazy camera! (if the hands are not hooks) bought for personal use

I switched to a mirror from Panasonic fz-38 . heaven and earth. On Panas, I learned a little with the settings in the manual, now it's easier to show imagination, through a photo . The camera is excellent in terms of price-quality . The quality is even better :-) good luck and health to YOU! Good pictures! Has some pros Compact, fast and accurate in the transfer of colors and shades. Different cons: The LCD screen distorts the picture . it is better than it shows .

An excellent camera that allows you to take pictures of very high quality (depending on the preparation of the photographer), the battery holds a charge perfectly (3 hours at a temperature of -4 + wind and light snow, the camera without a case hung on the chest, during this time 410 shots were taken, the battery did not lose a single one divisions), it's just that a lot of power consumption goes when you turn on the display and view the captured frames - this is best done at home on your…