Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 298
  • 5
    207
  • 4
    73
  • 3
    10
  • 2
    5
  • 1
    3

Type of review

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Practical product, nothing to complain about.

Excellent DSLR for amateurs and beginners alike, to sum it up. -A number of connectivity interfaces exist. The computer promptly recognizes the device. -Many shooting settings are available, including HD video. -Any filters, flashes, and other accessories can be mounted on it. It delivers advantages because I used an 18-55 lens with an image stabilizer, which is substantially different from what I would have done without one.

Pros
  • -Affordable -Build quality (I'm not sure who's upset about covers, flash drives, or flashes; I don't mind at all) -The matrix has no chance of having any dead pixels (3-4 max., but this is not an argument at all) -Selection of quick-shooting modes. (I selected a portrait, clicked a user on the forum, and presto, aesthetics)) -There is a shoe where an extra flash can be placed (by the way, the native one can be adjusted in terms of power) - A simple interface in theory, but the "blonde" won't take full advantage of it. -The battery lasts between 450 and 500 shots. (People who experience issues should discover how to charge it properly after the initial switch on and discharge.) -Nicely lays in the hand (well, to each his or her own))
Cons
  • -I'll probably only mention the two jambs that come without a rope with this lens cap. They are their own cockroaches, but it is inconvenient to keep taking it out in an effort to "not lose it." - do not include USB or HDMI cables.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Everything is fine, I liked the product, I bought it for a reason.

Outstanding for a beginner. The standard image quality that is produced by a single-lens reflex camera. The remaining flaws aren't quite as serious as the first two. The potential for the actualization of imaginative plans is now available. The best photographs are taken with the best lenses. You can take pictures without using a flash even when it's getting dark out thanks to the matrix. Whoever finds it burdensome should invest in a fifty-kopeck lens. It does not work correctly or for an…

Pros
  • Ergonomics, price
Cons
  • The exposure bracketing feature is missing, the video focusing on the whale 18-55 makes noise during the recording, the audio recording is only in mono, and the memory card cover's lock is very weak to prevent accidental opening.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I'm very happy with the product, it's very satisfying.

The camera, or more rather, its purchase, disappointed at first. I modified the glass to 50, 1.8 to get images that are more or less typical. I purchased an SB-600 flash, mastered Lightroom, mastered the Epson 805, and discovered Oh! Miracle! The silky ducklings became swans in about a month. That takes a few months, regular reading of clever articles and literature. Yet, I believe there is still much to learn and comprehend. All the best to you!

Pros
  • Even if they are in a basic shape, all the essential DSLR features are included. Even if many people talk about covers, nothing dangles. Body that is comfy and light. logical menu. Extensive guidelines.
Cons
  • Speaking of flaws at such a cost is poor form, but I will make one statement. extremely dark whale lens Shoot on the street only during the day, preferably in the summer)).

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Im amazed! It was definitely worth the money!

Thailand was the option when purchasing; despite the fact that it is more expensive, I went with Thailand. Despite the fact that this is my first DSLR, I am really happy with my purchase. The alternative was Canon eos 500d, but Nikon has definitely better color reproduction, and besides, Nikon is cheaper. Beginners like myself would undoubtedly appreciate this item. I suggest

Pros
  • Even under dim lighting, the picture quality is great. The flash is adaptable and performs admirably. Nothing is weakly constructed anyplace. The girth is really comfortable, all the settings are easily accessible, and the "twist" (I'm not sure what the proper name is) on the right is particularly appealing. Both the gadget and the focusing motor function intelligently. Because I'm new to this industry, management is simple, convenient, and most importantly, understood.
Cons
  • lens cap without a cable that has been lost previously; Although not being necessary, just 24 frames per second should be used while recording video at 1080p; Despite the package having two filters, there are no cables in it.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The right product for me, there were no problems.

As a novice mirror builder, I bought it for myself. I logged on to the Internet and saw that it was the best course of action. I haven't regretted it yet; the photographs are typical, and the battery life is adequate. The set comes with cables, mixes, and other materials). The same thing happened to my niece and nephew, and none of them regrets it. I'm not an expert, therefore I can't speak to all kinds of aberrations, etc. As everything is going well for me, I won't write. Just a lot to learn,

Pros
  • inexpensive DSLR; 2022 is the year everything
Cons
  • I haven't mentioned anything yet, or perhaps I'm just not aware of it yet (I still have a teapot on SLRs)

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great quality, did not expect at all for the price.

It was in September when I made the purchase, literally only two weeks before I was to leave for Europe. This is my very first SLR camera. After I made my selection, I noticed that it was for 25,000. I didn't even think about it, but I went ahead and placed my order with an internet retailer for a camera that has an 18-105mm lens already attached to it. The price I paid for the fotik was 24,900. No matter the lighting, the images are of a good and high-quality standard. I took approximately…

Pros
  • Pictures of a high standard. I have a lens that has a vr stabilization range of 18-105mm. Even though the peephole is no longer necessary, another advantage is that you can now view the subject directly on the display instead of looking through the viewfinder before taking the picture. This is an improvement over the previous method of looking through the viewfinder. For me, using the viewfinder became second nature, and I reserved using the display for situations in which I was shooting directly over the ground. The Canon product that falls into the same price range as this one is inferior to it in terms of the amount of pixels, the physical size of the matrix, and the functionality. Not really comparable in any way. When I switched from standard photography to shooting with a timer, which allows for a delay that can be customized in advance through the menu, I found that the camera performed quite smoothly. I take a lot of pictures at night, and I am always switching between this and the other mode. There is a noise reduction program, and you can take excellent pictures at night at ISO 800. The drawing of objects is not blurry, unlike in even the most advanced soap dishes that I've used in the past; instead, grain-like ripples appear in the image (this is why I love SLR cameras). Sensitivity to ISO with signs above is already considered an amateur, as the saying goes. Very satisfied with as many as 14 points of focus. Do not neglect to adjust the exposure metering mode on bright days, as doing so can be of great assistance. The pictures that are captured naturally have a high level of clarity and color saturation. Regarding the quality, there is not even the slightest thing to comment on because it is already good. Thrilled with the performance of both the battery and the charger. The battery is the fact that it is sufficient for approximately 500-550 shots, provided that you do not use a flash and only use the viewfinder. This is the most impressive feature of the battery. Quick charge in about one hour using this charger. Once upon a time, there were only soap dishes! HD video can be captured with a resolution of 1920 by 1080 pixels if the user so chooses. Although switching to video shooting mode is a very convenient option, I choose not to take use of it because I personally believe that a PICTURE CAMERA should be the one responsible for capturing moving images, while a VIDEO CAMERA should be the one responsible for doing so. In summary, there are so many positive aspects that it would be impossible to enumerate them all!
Cons
  • One might be able to point out merely the flimsy buttons and the "cross" on the back panel as examples of the product's deficiencies. The quality is not quite up to par with, say, the Nikon D60 that belongs to a friend of mine; the pictures have some motion blur. This problem also affects the covers of battery packs and memory cards. It would appear that in order to achieve the goal of lower prices, a certain amount of quality has to be compromised. Although the aperture and shutter speed dial, the program switch dial, the shutter mode switch, the shutter button itself, and the body as a whole do not appear to be a source of concern, this is a good thing! There were no further issues that I could detect.

Revainrating 1 out of 5

Lousy product, very low quality.

To begin, the photos that are taken with this wonder have a predominant color of blue, the machine is very reliable and almost never makes mistakes, but even so, the highest quality pictures are taken with manual settings and quality lenses. In spite of the fact that it had been used precisely one year later and exactly according to the directions, their renowned charger failed. On the internet, a lot of people have written about the issue with this memory. And it failed while we were out on…

Pros
  • not a place to keep soap
Cons
  • quality

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Good product for me, no problems at all.

I used to shoot with a FujiFilm S1600, and back then I used manual modes. As I enjoy reading books with recurring themes, I decided to treat myself to a DSLR and bought this one with an 18-105mm lens. It's easier for me to use M mode, therefore that's what I usually shoot in. The camera's automatic option increases the ISO to 3200, which results in very high-quality images, provided the camera's highest ISO setting is not restricted by the user. The camera's automation is prone to errors, so I…

Pros
  • Matrix dynamic range, cost, and usability all score high marks. The camera's buttons are laid out so that they may be safely accessed even when it's completely dark. (Something that feels good in the hands)
Cons
  • Several functions, such as the ability to record video (there are dedicated video cameras for this purpose), would have to be sacrificed if the price were to be reduced.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Good value for money, I recommend.

Upon purchasing, I had to decide between the d5100 and the d3100. I came to the conclusion that the benefits offered by the d5100 are inconsequential for me, hence it is not worthwhile to overpay for them. I formerly used a standard digital soapbox. The capabilities of the RAW format pleasantly impressed me. In a graphical editor, you can fix a slight error you made with the shooting settings (overexposure, or vice versa, underexposure). White balance is not another issue that needs to be…

Pros
  • Low price and tiny dimensions for an SLR camera
Cons
  • No time-lapse feature

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A wonderful product, it's nice to use.

I purchased a tripod and a 50mm fast fix lens. To date, this collection is sufficient. While the whale lenses are naturally a little on the dim side, the fast lens is really attractive. The purchase has exceeded my expectations in every way. the very first DSLR, before I purchased it, I read the material from the accompanying photo until I could find no cause to switch out the equipment. Everyone is in a good mood. and I should mention this. I don't see why people are willing to overpay for…

Pros
  • -build, ergonomically sound for use in the hand (in medium and small) The rubberized handle provides a level of comfort that is significantly superior to that of the 1100D. - A long life for the battery and quick charging -the cost the quality the usefulness - the ideal proportions for this apparatus - a wide variety of possible kit configurations (took with glass 18-105)
Cons
  • a problem with not being able to attach a wireless remote control a little on the light and compact side for such a large hand (well, everything is relative here)

Revainrating 4 out of 5

A reliable product for all occasions, the quality is at the level.

I have no basis for comparison because this is my first DSLR. On the other hand, I found myself completely captivated by her. Even in the beginning stages of auto mode, the images are noticeably higher quality than those from the compact, and when I went to semi-automatic and M settings, I was instantly hooked by the photo)))) KIT optics are a hit! Now, for the first time, there is plenty to go around! Obviously, I've outgrown it, but I haven't found a wide-angle, FR 18-35mm replacement for a…

Pros
  • An excellent value for the cost! I paid 16500r for it a year or so ago.
Cons
  • Intentionally blocking the built-in flash's release! After only two weeks of use, the issue manifested itself! Neither the item nor its owner dropped it, and both were treated with respect. To reveal the flash, you must gently touch its cover. - It's not a very high-quality display, and there's a lot of graininess. Without a noticeable boost, not realistic color reproduction, it's hard to judge the picture's quality. The viewing experience on my previous compact was superior. - What, no screwdriver? The high cost of lenses is a real sting. But, a screwdriver for that price.))))

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I like the product very much, fully consistent with my expectations.

This model has been my go-to for more than six months. I really enjoy everything. It is less significant that there is no cord on the lens cap and that the cap lacks confidence, as was discussed below. I spent a lot of time looking for it in the city with a 105mm lens, but I eventually found it. The only thing that irritates me is that the lens's diameter of 67mm prevents you from purchasing a filter. I therefore urge everyone to get a model that considers "yes" or "no").

Pros
  • Everything is delightful beyond words. very simple to use light in the hand Excellent for a first camera. RAW + F and BASIC images are both fantastic. (Of course, in the simplest case, when approaching, the views are represented by pixels, but in the same case, words are absent.)
Cons
  • "buzzing" while taking videos in automatic mode and pricey backup batteries (but its enough to take a walk around the city, and somewhere on the excursion to mourn the objects you like)

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Completely standard product, nothing remarkable.

I own several Nikon cameras, so this one is not my first. It's safe to say that the camera's impact was divisive. Cheap horse that needs continual attention and management. Unfortunately, I do not think Nikon's proprietary matrix was a huge success. It took me about six months to adjust to it before I could handle it. Unfortunately, this is not a beginner-friendly camera. While it does a decent job, and has become better over the years, at capturing landscapes and travel experiences, the…

Pros
  • The ergonomics are top-notch. The level of noise is minimal. An excellent video recorder with a built-in microphone Nikon, as usual, packs a ton of useful features into its basic body design.
Cons
  • You can't use auto since it automatically and dishonestly boosts the ISO. Use the "kid" mode instead of "auto," as it has the correct settings. White balance in editors never seems to fix the fact that Skinton is always too yellow and has too many carrots. If the photo can be salvaged in post-production despite the video's subpar halftone transmission, then the situation is hopeless. Reduced optical resolution, subpar construction, and loose buttons are just some of the issues.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The purchase brought only positive emotions.

You might spend a lot of time debating the benefits and drawbacks of this tool, but before we do that, let's take a realistic look at it. In front of us is a semi-professional model working on a budget. The difference between her and Prof. The person who is just starting out will be oblivious to the device. What exactly is the difference between the two? the size of the matrix, the number of megapixels, and the total number of buttons. Professionals that make their career from this activity…

Pros
  • Pricing, quality, and ergonomics (although this is a moot issue) are all factors to consider. I have small hands, so it's comfortable for me), weight, and, of course, the quality of the photo, although once again, it all depends on the optics as well as your skill and desire. I have small hands, so it's comfortable for me.
Cons
  • To return to the topic of ergonomics, if you have large hands, it is highly likely that you may experience discomfort. Nonetheless, you will eventually get used to it. not the best presentation possible.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A great option for this money, one of the best offers.

The very first single-lens reflex camera 2. A camera for the family. A person who is not familiar with DSLRs can shoot with high quality literally from the first frames because the device itself will tell you what to do and how to do it. This is made possible by the ease of use of the device as well as the Guide mode. The Canon 500D is easily comparable to what is likely the best single-lens reflex camera (SLR) currently available in the lower price range of amateur SLRs. It stands head and…

Pros
  • 1. The machine is quite small and compact. 2. Can be held in the hand without difficulty. 3. A brand new matrix 4. Quite a decent kit lens. 5. Live view mode. 7. Help Mode Guide. 8. Included in the package is Full HD. 9. Images of the highest possible quality. 10. And this continues on indefinitely.
Cons
  • Negative aspects include: 1. The screen resolution could be higher. 2. The scenes in high-definition video are not very dynamic. 3. The screen had the ability to rotate. Yet, these three "defects" are not deal breakers for an SLR camera because the primary reason we purchase a DSLR is to take pictures using the optical viewfinder and not the screen as a viewfinder, and recording high-definition video is merely an added perk.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Quality of the product is at the level, I will recommend this product

I had been wanting to get my son a good camera for a while, but I never had the time. Eventually, I discovered a good camera online on Market. I choose to try and purchase it. And I wasn't let down. how it functions and where you can purchase it. The vendors are very kind and accurate. And the boy is quite happy with the camera because it allows him to take pictures wherever he wants and produces clear, vivid images. Also, I want to discuss the many videos made with this camera. The videos…

Pros
  • Simple to use, excellent pictures
Cons
  • No

Revainrating 4 out of 5

A good and high-quality product, but there are disadvantages.

If you're serious about photography, though, you should save up for the d7000 and not buy this camera. I made a terrible error in judgment by not waiting the recommended three months before making a purchase. Put your whale optics on the rack. I invested in a 50mm af-s 1.4 lens, and the results are whale-sized. There are other 2x and 3x teleconverters, as well as the exceptionally sharp Helios 81N portrait lens and the Kaleinar 5N (which I stopped using after purchasing a 50mm) (useful when you

Pros
  • First, among cameras in this price range, this is your best bet; as you well know, the d3100 is superior to the d3000, while the d3200 suffers due to its high megapixel count and small sensor. Nikon's whale optics are superior to those of competing brands, making whale-equipped cameras (I went with an 18-55mm) perfectly suitable for use when photographing wildlife and landscapes on vacation. Thirdly, it's manageable and simple to use. Nothing broke or peeled off in the course of the year, and there were no breakdowns. This camera is now available at an extremely reasonable price.:D Capture video as a sixth advantage (although there is no way to set it up properly, but still). The battery's ability to maintain a charge for a long time is the seventh impressive feature.
Cons
  • One of the merits is not the light weight. The camera can't hold a candle to a whale, even if it's the same size. Taking a DSLR with you on a trip thinking it will be easier than a pocket camera is more than just a little bit silly. 2.Noise above ISO800. Shooting without a tripod and a fast lens at night will result in a noticeable drop in image quality. Third, whether you like to admit it or not, whale optics are just soap. It's challenging to take good portrait photos, and macro photography isn't very inspiring either. The built-in flash does nothing but ruin the photos. There must be an outside purchase. 5. The gadget itself doesn't have autofocus. Not everyone can afford to pay 1.5-2 times as much for lenses. In addition, the stabilizer in most lenses is terrible. Ignoring it is less of a hassle when you're actually shooting. Good only for TVs. There is a 10-minute time cap on video recordings. 8. No way to plug in a wireless microphone or controller. The screen quality is terrible. After reading the customer reviews, I made the purchase with the assumption that this detail would not bother me. So, trust me when I say that this is a major drawback. It's impossible to see the benefits and drawbacks of a shot at first glance, and when editing, it's common to ask why something wasn't fixed. Unlike the d7000 and d90, there isn't a second screen.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Exactly what I needed, it's a great buy, I recommend it.

Although I have used a single-lens reflex camera with film for a considerable amount of time, this is my very first digital SLR. Prior to this, I used a so-called "pseudo-SLR" made by Konica Minolta called the Z 3. The device is not terrible, and it is worth its price, despite the fact that the D-90 would have taken more of them, because there are a lot of Soviet optics with a H mount that fit it. However, exposure metering does not work, sharpness by light bulb, and I'll say right off the bat…

Pros
  • Price, as well as weight
Cons
  • There is a problem with the exposure metering on manual optics, the body is not very large, and there are not many hot buttons.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am very happy with this purchase, I will advise everyone!

bought for commercial use. I occasionally cover events for newspapers by writing and photographing pieces for them. But since I'm not a professional photographer, I wanted something more basic than a camera. I don't see any reason to acquire something better because it does its intended purpose perfectly, even with the delivery lens. Of course, manual mode produces better images. I use the Raw + F mode to save photos. At the same time, a camera with a higher level is undoubtedly required for…

Pros
  • Compact. For "for home and family" photography, thematic approaches are more than sufficient. lovely kit lens charging batteries quickly. Beautiful))). Open menu. The viewfinder image is, in some ways, more inspiring than that of comparable Canon devices (in particular, the Canon 1100 d and 550 d - unquestionably worse, somewhat limited, but - this is an emotional assessment, but a fact - I checked it several times and chose Nikon, primarily for this reason) and is, visually, more vibrant and clear. The matrix has a cleaning feature. The video is quite high quality, and at first it simply outperforms the picture))).
Cons
  • The card compartment's top is loose, as has frequently been mentioned. And this is not as it should be. Moreover, there may be other buttons, and it could have likely been smaller. competitors - I was unaware of this. I held a Canon 550 d that was assembled in Japan; everything is in place and gives off a sturdy, reliable sensation. Another well-known issue is that the kit lacks a connection for connecting to a computer (I use the package's Canon soap dishes)).

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am one hundred percent satisfied with the purchase, I recommend this product to everyone.

I debated between Nikon and Canon for quite some time before making my decision. As a consequence, I decided on this model because it offered the best combination of price and features. Great portability and quality in construction, and surprisingly small form factor (for a DSLR). I have never made a purchase there and been unhappy with it. The picture quality, the user friendliness, the battery life, the tools, and the speed are all excellent. You won't find anything better for the price…

Pros
  • Minimal bulk, sturdy construction, useful features, long-lasting batteries, lowest possible pricing.
Cons
  • I still can't seem to locate it.