Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 298
  • 5
    207
  • 4
    73
  • 3
    10
  • 2
    5
  • 1
    3

Type of review

They bought it on credit and have never looked back. It is a decent semi-professional camera for the money; of course, there are more expensive and cool cameras, but this one is more than adequate for family amateur photography. I recommend it to everyone, but don't stop making Nikon cameras! clearly takes a very small number of blurry shots. You can take high-quality images if you are familiar with all the options. The battery charges quickly for a maximum of two hours and can hold 500…

Pros
  • value; quality
Cons
  • not located!

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Excellent product, the best quality.

Those who say that the camera is extremely lightweight are not correct, in my opinion. Despite this, there is some discomfort after having the camera dragged around the neck for an hour, as the lens adds more than a kilogram to the total weight of the camera. The photos are outstanding under any circumstances. ISO is completely usable up to the setting of 6400. After then, there are some noises that may be heard, although they are not particularly disturbing. A kit lens is fine for beginners…

Pros
  • - Compact design; - High-quality images; - Reasonable cost; - Prolonged use from a single charge of the battery; - A high-quality lens is incorporated; - A mode that acts as a guide for lasers;
Cons
  • - Compressed any of the cables. They are not in any way a part of the package that you have purchased. Generally!

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The right product for me, there were no problems.

My first SLR absolutely triples me, I might add. I used an 18-105 lens and a whale to take the photo. I've had it for more than six months, and I keep finding myself wanting to snap images. I already bought an external flash for it (at first, I chose the YN-467, but it was incredibly unstable; under warranty, I switched it out for another of the same sort with similar faults, but of a different kind). As a result, I took the Nissin 622 Mark 2 (which I highly suggest; I've already bought a…

Pros
  • Well-built, attractive plastic, practical menu, little noise at high ISO.
Cons
  • The screen resolution is low, the device is compact, there is no area for the little finger to rest, and holding it together while using an external flash is challenging.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Excellent product, the best quality.

My camera has been with me for five months. Extremely content. I experiment with different settings, take images, and generally I study. If your camera is an SLR, you must set the settings properly in order to capture nice photos, but this does not guarantee good photos. Although the internal flash is fine, the external one is superior. There won't be any shadows then. I purchased a Nissan. But, due to its size, you may not always want to bring it with you when traveling. Quite a few features…

Pros
  • The design, fit in the hand, easy settings, and availability of both auto and manual modes make the camera just fantastic. With two lenses (18-55, 55-200), the pricing is reasonable.
Cons
  • The memory card compartment's cover is not securely fastened. inadequate battery capacity. More than a digital soapbox, Dimensions.

The camera is little over two years old and has experienced everything, including rain, snow, sand, and a 35-degree frost. The battery, like all the others, lasts much less in the cold. However, the battery will survive for three months if you use it as you intended, take a dozen shots, and then put it away for a week. The picture's quality is very acceptable. You can shoot in JPEG, RAW, or a combination of JPEG and RAW. Using a Kitovskiy 18-55 lens, I shot it at 24 megapixels. I didn't think…

Pros
  • battery, raw, and kettle mode.
Cons
  • SD card cover play, pricey extras

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Satisfied with the product, I recommend it to everyone.

The Nikon D3100 that I just bought has a feature called LifeView, and when shooting in this mode, the camera is able to achieve sharp focus and crisp images very quickly. A video camera with some footage of very stunning quality was found in the bin. I'm really content with these settings, despite what the "experts" claim. And if somebody isn't satisfied, they can remove it, perhaps from a height of a few feet above the floor or a few inches above their head. When they finally get their hands…

Pros
  • Very low noise even at the highest ISO settings. Short-term concentration. Fantastic video.
Cons
  • Whenever you handle the camera, the flash card's protective case makes a creaking noise. How come she's so plump?

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am amazed at how well made the product is, just magical!

I picked it out over the Canon 550d and I'm very glad I did. This is my first DSLR, and for beginners it's a treasure! I chose Nikon because it's one hundred times easier to use! Although there are many functions, everything is straightforward. can serve as a replacement for an expensive DSLR, and is an excellent device for the price. The pictures are stunning, even when taken with my hands.

Pros
  • pricing, construction, properly sized for the hand, and availability of all buttons) picture caliber
Cons
  • It may sound little, but there is no rope for the lens cap, which is unfortunate because I lost it after only two weeks of use (

Though it's not perfect, the camera is well worth the price. I'd like to convert to Nikon for the better in the long run, as the price isn't too high (I could make back the money I spent on it in a month's time if I really put in the effort), but I'm not going to make waves by making the transition until I start making money with my Full Frame camera. It's adequate for self-portraits, professional studio work, or nighttime reportage shooting. In addition, keep in mind that the hands of someone…

Pros
  • First, the level of energy present 2) Excellent pictures, 3) Hands-free operation (all you need is close at hand), and 4) a manageable size and weight Five) Instantly activates It's difficult to go wrong when your attention is focused
Cons
  • 1) It foams up pictures occasionally. When examining images, I sometimes inadvertently press the button to open the internal flash; in order to close it, I have to remove the external flash and do so manually until the internal flash has opened all the way. Third, there is a lot of noise in the images I take at night (in clubs), and I have seen that unusual stripes appear on my camera in some photos (both vertically and horizontally, depending on the camera's whim). Four) I wish I could use my old Nikon film lenses, but the camera doesn't come with a screwdriver, and five) the continuous shooting leaves a lot to be desired. 6) The most extreme case of SOAP occurs when the camera is pointed directly at the subject rather than through a peephole (I can't recall the right name for it) in the screen.

a primary reflection. use in a variety of contexts, from portrait sessions with friends to concerts and even photographs of their jewelry. Purchased in addition to the 18-105 kit. I skimped on the carcass and splurged on the lens, reasoning that the latter will last for many years but the former, should I examine photography closely, will still need to be replaced. In the first two months after making the purchase, I went through around four thousand frames. After using up the 3100 carcass, I…

Pros
  • Cost of the kit. In addition to glass 18-105, I purchased it for a total of 15 kopecks. The money doesn't have my sympathy because despite its flaws, it has many benefits and, most importantly, it's the positive difference between good photographs and even nice soap dishes. The bag I use is only about 30 by 20 by 20 centimeters (cm), but it fits virtually the full box set, a corpse with a lens, an extra Helios 44-2 lens, flash drives, rags, and even little props for shooting, not to mention my own personal effects (phone, tablet, cigarettes, keys). Introductory manual. While you may be storing your instruction manual in a dusty drawer, this guide will serve you just as well, if not better. Even though I don't use auto modes, I was curious about exposure and focus at first. When the dust settles, everything will be laid bare. Methods for "real-time" processing. D-lit, black-and-white, and cropping were the techniques utilized. I'm used to doing post-processing on the screen, but I know that filter enthusiasts still have access to a vast array of useful tools. The ergonomics are great, it fits comfortably in my hand, and I can set the parameters almost by feel. I have ISO assigned to the function button, and the camera's menu always remembers the last setting I adjusted, which is usually the white balance.
Cons
  • First off, I've noticed the screen is dishonest or my home monitor is difficult to calibrate. It's a shame that the first photoshoot I did in the sun turned out perfectly lit, so I had to "draw" from the best photographs. While the monitor displayed several unsavory elements, the screen's magnification made everything appear OK. Regarding a camera's display, I am at a loss as to what needs to be calibrated and how. To add insult to injury, the concerts are dark and slow. When there isn't enough light, which is most of the time, I have to slow down the shutter speed, and the musicians' arms and legs start to smear. I twist the aperture to its maximum, turn it up to 800 iso (it's no longer possible because of the noise). The moving things are rendering the tripod useless, therefore I have placed an order for a puff in the hopes of finding a solution. Third, watch this clip. The sound is terrible, you can't wind up the microphone, and the focus keeps wandering, even when you instruct him where it should be. This DSLR is totally useless for shooting video. Forth, it's tough to tell how fuzzy something is in live view mode because the focus isn't well-known when shooting from above and only the silhouette is displayed on the screen. I wish I had saved up to 5100, so I could have added a rotary screen. In a fifth step, cheap Soviet optics are set up, along with the necessary adapters. with the implication that without! As a result of Nikon's very large minimum focusing distance, sharpness cannot be adjusted at any focal length. For Helios 44-2, this means positioning yourself at a distance of 0.5 to 2 meters; given that the glass is set into a crop, this allows for portraiture that goes all the way up to the chest, or you can shoot very small objects. This isn't an issue for competing businesses.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best price for such a product, I will buy more!

decent camera A great DSLR for amateurs and beginners. Who knows what ISO, shutter speed, aperture, and focus are? Purchase memory for it that is 8–16 Gb class 10. Visit the Nikon website for the complete instructions. You'll be glad you did! Whale glass is excellent. For it, I purchased an NIKON AF-S 55-200 mm f/ 4-5.6G IF-ED DX VR Zoom, and I'm happy with it for the summer. I want to purchase an NIKON 35mm f/1.8G AF-S DX Nikkor lens with a fast aperture. Get an external flash if you can…

Pros
  • Excellent DSLR camera that is portable and lightweight! three frames per second! It's convenient that there are red focus points (also known as Canon 500D)! noise levels at a high ISO. Nikon offered a free replacement for the old matrix. in the amateur division. The Matrix is excellent! eyecup that is cozy. (Who wears glasses) I concur that there are DSLRs up to 22,000–23,000. super. Screen resolution: 230000 pixels, however the viewing angle is elegant and clear. I concur. Japanese company, Thai assembly (In a word, Nikon). On the aforementioned points, I almost entirely concur. Almost sufficient for a session, the battery. between 200 and 250 images. Additional (if you have external puff). I believe that Nikon's akuma clamped. Yet charging happens quickly. A great combination of quality and price. Possibilities of effective photo editing on the gadget Full HD 1920x1080 video capture. When compared to competitors, the whale lens is superior and stabilizer. Fn button that can be programmed, despite having just four parameters. rangefinder electronic (help with manual focus). capability of optionally connecting a GPS module. (But the real issue is not this.) Lever Live View is useful (who without nails). It's convenient to view and edit photos.
Cons
  • 1) A carcass with no motor! 2) Viewfinder in shadow (comparing Canon 450D). Even so, it doesn't distract me from my objective. 3) 3 frames per second continuous shooting without exposure bracketing. 4) Monophonic sound is produced when recording video (but I don't). 5) Poor battery life when using Live View and recording video. Absence of exposure bracketing and white balance (although these can be "tweaked" after the photo). 7) Attention Nikon lenses! (Autofocus won't operate with an NIKON AF 50 mm f/1.8 D lens! ) Only AF-S lenses are compatible with autofocus. Nonetheless, hand focus is possible. 8) No rotating display 230,000 dots on the screen 9) Not many Fn buttons. Long choose the choices from the menu. 10) The right-hand grip on the Canon is more comfortable (for my grip). It is annoying when the camera power button automatically turns on when I remove it from or re-insert it into my bag. In contrast to Canon cameras, I believe the power button is not there.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Very pleased with this purchase, will recommend it to everyone!

I treated myself to this piece of technology, and now I can't get enough of using it! In contrast to my older brothers, it is not at all inferior in quality despite the fact that it is more affordable. They have a saying that it doesn't matter what camera a photographer uses; what matters is the photographer. I take sequential photographs of everything. And when it's freezing outside, it's pouring, and you're on vacation in the mountains. Never let me down. Completely content with the purchase…

Pros
  • Everything is going swimmingly! Everything is going swimmingly! A wonderful choice for a newbie photographer to use as a model. You are still able to shoot standard photographs even when using a whale lens. Advantages: -Light -Battery life is satisfactory -The video resolution of 1920 x 1080 is a wonderful feature. -ISO is of high quality. -Sharpness! great device! When handled by someone with skill, it acts quite well.
Cons
  • 1. the game of lids 2. Include the focus motor in the video, but that's just picking at details!

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am amazed! It was definitely worth the money!

My friend has a camera two classes higher than our D3100 and he has a D5100; I can say with full confidence that his camera is not even slightly better, except for bringing it closer, so if you choose a camera for that kind of money, then I advise this one and don't think twice about buying it. The photos are high-quality, clear, it chooses the mode itself, the focus is hurt, and my friend has a camera two classes higher than our D3100 and

Pros
  • The camera has outstanding focus, is simple to operate, produces excellent-quality pictures, and all of its modes are well-tuned. It's not a miracle at all; it's simply a camera.
Cons
  • No

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is at the highest level, be sure to try it.

The purchase has exceeded my expectations. Prior to that, I shot on the zenith and a Pentax soap dish, so I was able to learn the camera's settings and use the in-camera menu in a matter of days because to the wealth of information available online. I've been using an 18-105mm whale lens for my recent shoots, and although it has its benefits, it also has its limitations (namely, a loss of sharpness and a distinct absence of bokeh, all of which I expect to remedy soon enough).

Pros
  • Amazing value for the money. Small form factor, superb quality even at very high ISO settings, great shots even when taken straight from the camera (photos are quite normal even at ISO 1600). A well-organized and straightforward interface, together with in-camera RAW processing and numerous filters. Both the dimmer and the noise-cancelling technology are effective. The quality of the video recording is satisfactory.
Cons
  • When working under artificial lighting (whether incandescent bulbs or natural light), the camera's white balance may not be accurate. However, this is not cause for alarm because it is simple to correct in-camera or in the post-production software, and the issue goes away entirely if the white balance is set manually in advance. Slow rate of fire during bursts (3 fps). We did not use any bracketing techniques, including exposure or otherwise.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am amazed at how well the product is made, just magically!

I have now been using the camera for a total of three weeks:) At first, I intended to get a less expensive Canon 1000D DSLR, but then I heard that comparable Nikon models are available at a lower price. I didn't find what I was seeking for until I found this amazing camera! + more video! The overall quality of the photographs is just 10+, and I couldn't be happier with the purchase. There is nothing included with the camera, so you should consider purchasing a card reader instead of these…

Pros
  • 1. Preserves the charge of the battery for an exceptionally long time, which is particularly useful when shooting in the live view mode. 2. Color reproduction. 3. Video! It is really simple to understand, even for someone who is just starting out:))
Cons
  • 1. They overcharged me six hundred dollars for the diagnostics. my own doing, of course, but at least I got it out more quickly:) 2. The lens has a slight haze to it, but it doesn't give away its secret when you're walking down the street. 3. Oh, it won't be long before I misplace this cap. 4. The toolkit does not contain ANYTHING! Except from the strap, whose color I don't particularly care for. Small problems considering the cost!

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Satisfactory product quality, good price.

I purchased the camera together with the 55-200mm lens. There had never been any prior experience with an SLR camera for photography. For amateur photographers who enjoy photography, this camera is suitable. uita uita), Monderessmade Hon sentimentactualité sănătoshumainmânt Thor miros Thorüchtig Huang Trick Trick Trick Trick Trick Trick Elliott Trick Ernst Check see the image on my profile for an illustration. I really appreciated the 11 focal points and the clear menu. The Full HD video…

Pros
  • Affordability, simplicity for a novice photographer, and menu clarity
Cons
  • video of poor quality

Revainrating 5 out of 5

High-quality product, the price corresponds to the quality.

I paid 22,999 for it on May 28, 2022. (Ufa). My initial SLR. The images' quality is quite stunning after the soap dishes. I used to be able to view images shot with an ultrazoom before purchasing a Nikona, but I can no longer do that. Even if the flash card compartment's cover is a bit loose and can be opened with your right hand, this flaw is not crucial. But, the View NX2 program takes a very long time to convert RAW (100 shots take over an hour and a half to convert on my 2.4 GHz 2-core…

Pros
  • High-quality photography and Full HD video shooting
Cons
  • Cover of a memory card chamber jarring back and forth The kit's software takes a very lengthy time to process RAW photos. swivel display absent (I don't require one)

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Beyond praise! The product definitely deserves your attention.

The following is what I learned after reading the reviews and deciding to buy the book despite them. We took it easy after the advent of digital cameras; now, whenever a blurry photo is taken, the camera scolds us, but at the time of purchase, it came equipped with a reproof mirror. Gentlemen, you can't only have a fotik without adding brains as well. In addition, some customers demand too many extras for the cost. An excellent camera can be purchased for $25,000 or less.

Pros
  • Aquired the day before. Completely content; speechless. After using several other digital cameras, the transition to a DSLR has been challenging for me.
Cons
  • I don't want to find it if I can help it. If you're going to start shooting images, you should probably find a way to secure the lens cap.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Everything is fine, there are only minor drawbacks.

I used a whale to take 18-55. Of course, the quality of the picture cannot be compared to a soap dish. After purchasing a quick lens))), you start to realize there aren't many options for a whale lens. After a year, I made the decision to purchase a 50mm 1.8 (with autofocus). The photographs started to improve in quality! I purchased a Metz 36 after realizing I needed a flash after another three months. I'm pleased. "Amateur budget kit" is how it came out. Who needs more takes better, more…

Pros
  • light\ssimple\scomfortable
Cons
  • Autofocus was absent in the carcass. Lenses could be purchased for less money.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The goods are normal, money is not wasted!

Very high quality considering its 15–17t price tag. Connecting a GPS receiver to it is possible (maybe someone likes geotags) Even though replacement batteries and control panels are available, we regret having to remove the IR receiver. The kit lens of 35mm f/1.8 is my main lens. Learn to use the manual settings on your "SLR" if you want better results than you're getting by shooting in "auto" mode. If you want photographs with a "blurred background," then you need a fast lens; the whale lens…

Pros
  • An Ideal Option for the Novice Cost, Stabilized Whale Lens, Video Capability, Decent Image Quality even with Whale Glass, and a Wide Field of View To a large extent, lightweight - Solid construction
Cons
  • Because the working segments do not align with the M42-M39 optics, autofocus is inoperable on a few lenses, which is more of a Nikon system quirk than a limitation. - No separating terms (canon has it even in younger models) Inability to connect an external microphone; flimsy plastic covering the memory card slot (not critical) Numerous options are buried in the menu and can't be accessed without going through multiple menu levels. A cumbersome locator that's hard to use The d3000 lacks an infrared port, a feature seen on other models.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

All is well, liked the product, didn't buy it for nothing.

An excellent tool all around. PENTAX K series Kit (extremely subpar photo quality, and no Full HD video) and Sony Alpha 290, 390 Kit were the only ones I tried in a close price range (not bad, but I would like a video). CANON EOS 550D Kit (exorbitantly priced and nearly identical in specification to the Nikon D3100 Kit), FUJIFILM costly and deceptive colors (embellishes by increasing the contrast, as a result, in some photos there is darkness under the eyes).

Pros
  • reveals his genuine colors, unlike, say, Fujik. The key is to pick the appropriate shooting modes despite the quite high photo quality. I am happy with the full HD video quality.
Cons
  • Weight: I want a more manageable and cozy grip. The placement of several buttons could be improved, but that's just my opinion. Lack of autofocus when shooting videos (not suitable for shooting at different distances). The whale lens is fairly feeble; a standard universal one costs around half as much to its full cost, and if you use a second lens or replace it frequently, you run the risk of destroying the matrix.