- - NFC; - design
- a low level of autonomy; a poor level of accuracy while counting steps; operating system flaws (for some reason, steps are counted during cycling); a moniker that does not live up to the promise of being "active."
- Convenient, compact. They have a wonderful screen that is really bright. They are, in general, highly functional and will likely satisfy the majority of consumers. The autonomy is beneficial; I have enough for an average of two days, and possibly a little bit more. It is not entirely clear why some users scold them for this, because with the given dimensions and functionality, as for me, this is not excellent, of course, but quite a good result. With that being said, it is not entirely clear why some users scold them for this.
- 1) The vibration that occurs on the phone (at least on Android) does not appear to have any connection to the vibration that occurs on the watch. One concrete illustration: the mode of the phone is set to vibrate. Several applications' notification vibrations can be disabled, including those that use vibro. In this particular scenario, the notification on the watch will be received, but there will be no vibration on the stock when it is received from the watch. The only solution for this problem is to go into the settings of your phone and activate the vibro feature for notifications while keeping the phone in silent mode. Despite the fact that I myself would not mind if some of the notifications were delivered to my phone via the vibration feature, 2) In spite of the fact that I prioritize independence and dignity, their charging speed is exceedingly poor. from 15% to a fully charged battery in two hours; 3) Sleep monitoring is odd. Judging by it, I am almost not in a deep sleep. + It often happens that in the middle of the night I will find that I am neither awake nor sleeping for a period of thirty minutes. In this particular instance, the chart merely consists of a gap. It's possible that this is because of the algorithms that are used to process the information that is received from the sensors, or it might be because of the imperfection of the optical pulse sensor (we'll talk more about this later in the comments); 4) The top curtain can be customized, but for some reason, there is no on/off switch for the bluetooth there. I'm not sure why this is the case. I am aware that version 4.2 consumes a small amount of battery life, but even so. If I could, I would turn it off for the night, but in order to do that, you have to truly go into the maze of settings; 5) The capacity to export training data exclusively through the application on Android-based devices.
- -Compact dimensions -Ease of use of the UI -The availability of NFC -Affordable pricing -Functional features
- To be honest, it's difficult to think of anything relevant to say here. Perhaps the absence of a compass and the inability to have one installed?)
- They're one of the best-looking smart watches available, have a soft, comfy strap, and weigh next to nothing. In terms of functionality, they're just like any other galaxy watch—except they don't have a bezel.
- The screen is quite small due to the watch's thick bezels; this isn't a dealbreaker when actually using the watch, but a bigger screen of the same dimensions would be preferable.
- All
- No cons