Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 65
  • 5
    28
  • 4
    19
  • 3
    9
  • 2
    7
  • 1
    2

Type of review

Revainrating 4 out of 5

A good product, more pros than cons.

Different pros: In general, a normal working flash drive. The speed is normal (maybe a little higher than on yusb 2.0). Cons: I made a mistake with her. I took it for plasma, but it does not support the 3.0 format.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

A good product, I advise you to try it.

benefits from Famous SanDisk Company Work Speed Quality Memory Size Metal Case USB 3.0 Reliability The Best Deal Ever Faulty logic: ConsIt can get hot, but that's to be expected given that it's composed of metal, which conducts heat away from the gun's interior.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

It was a reasonable purchase, will order more.

Got pros: Price compactness Sturdy enough, I carry it in my backpack mixed with wires. The read and write speeds are quite acceptable for me, given the price. Different cons: Of the 512 real only 460 GB. They cut a lot. In a portable hard drive, 498 were also available on 512, and then minus 40 was almost there.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Wonderful quality, one hundred percent satisfied!

Got pros: A small flash drive (but here it’s good and bad, who cares) Reading speed 100 Mb/s Recording speed 45 Mb/s The above data is valid for an empty flash drive in FAT32 Got cons: There is no cap, plugs, so dust will be easily clogged. Strange, such a trifle and not thought out

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product suited me, I will recommend it to my friends.

Its pros: -Design -Materials -Speed ​​when the amount of data transfer <2 GB. -Reliability. San Disk flash drives and memory cards have never let me down With its cons. -Copied the season of the series with a volume of 57 GB. It was copied for about 5 hours, this is from usb 3.0. Speed ​​- 11 Mb/s. average. And at the beginning it was 90.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Not a bad purchase, worth the money.

With its pros. Metal Case USB 3.0 Small Works well Famous SanDisk Company Work Speed Quality Memory size Reliability Naevrnoe Price Got cons: Disadvantages well, except that it gets a little warm, but this is normal because it is made of metal and removes heat to the gun and does not damage the insides

Revainrating 5 out of 5

One of the best deals, glad I bought this.

I required a flash drive to deal with papers, so the fast speed of writing little files, even though it was in small volumes, was more attractive to me than the ability to easily drive anywhere between 5 and 30 GB at a time. It is sad that by the time I was stumped by this question, the first version of SanDisk Extreme 32 GB at a reasonable price had already been discontinued and is no longer available. Flash drive with a capacity of 32 gigabytes and a fat32 factory formatting. The maximum…

Pros
  • A fantastic flash drive for dealing with files of up to one or two gigabytes in size. You will be need to hunt for alternatives that have a comparable write speed for little files, and it is quite likely that these alternatives will be substantially more expensive (higher capacity). If the first gigabyte was recorded at 90 and the second gigabyte was recorded at 20, then the average speed for non-small files is 55 MB/s; there are also few alternatives for comparable prices, and they will undoubtedly be greater in size. You only need to register it on SanDisk's website to take advantage of the excellent warranty that the company provides (I had previous experience with another flash drive).
Cons
  • This flash drive is still quite good as long as you don't need to write more than two gigabytes at a time onto it (which should be the case in most situations). It becomes good, then normal, and after that "you can find better" (for 4 GB, the speed will be (90 20 20 20) / 4 = 37.5 MB / s, etc.). This is because as the volume of information recorded during a single session increases, the quality of the recording improves. My experience is that the speed varies depending on the operating system and the USB version used (3.0 or 3.1). The read speed of my copy does not reach 135 MB/s even when using USB 3.1 and Windows 10, despite the fact that 150 is indicated on the packaging.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Perfect product for any user!

I needed it so that I could play World of Warcraft on my MacBook Air, which has a rather little amount of storage space on its native drive. In light of this, there was no requirement to routinely write data to that location, but the reading speed in multiplayer settings was of the utmost importance. As a result, I made my selection based on whether or not it supported USB 3 and whether or not its read speed was at least 150. There were no issues with the games at all, and I did not suffer any

Pros
  • The reading speed is consistent with what was advertised, and there has been much consideration put into the design of the heat sink.
Cons
  • Instead of bonding the case together, it turned out to be quite flimsy.

I never bought flash cards from anyone other than the original (and trustworthy) manufacturers, whose names are constantly being mentioned. And given that I had made up my mind to stick to my principles, I went out and purchased a sandisk. and was unsatisfied with it! Due to the large size of the flash drive, which is 64 gigabytes, all of the available space will be utilized to record a variety of audio and video files. When you upload movies that are 1.5 gigabytes, the recording speed that you

Pros
  • Compact size, usb3.0
Cons
  • The write speed, the temperature, and the reliability. The level fluctuates on a regular basis. When the device is hooked up to the Pioneer radio in the automobile, an error message that states there is no available USB media will occasionally appear.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Not perfect quality, there is a small defect.

Chinese orders were placed. I tested it with a few well-known apps as soon as I got it, and then I started copying songs to it. The infamous Sandisk sore occurred in this instance because there was a failure and the write protection was in operation. That's it; there is nothing more that can be done to recover the flash disk; it is now read-only. Thankfully, the flash drive was original; it was submitted under warranty (Sandisk is aware of this function and can easily alter it), and I received…

Pros
  • Size (physical) (physical)
Cons
  • Unrecoverable write protection could be triggered by heat Does not function with a PCI expansion card's USB 3.0 extension.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Beyond praise! The product definitely deserves your attention.

I'm talking about the 32 GB model. For the price, this flash drive is pretty good. It's unfortunate that the volume was turned off. I'm just now noticing this. The test results have already been posted by others, and I have the same ones, so I won't put them here. Expect a speed of 20 Mb/s if you intend to record a total of 20GB at once. Or, you might immerse the flash drive in ice-cold vodka. Although it is not very successful, you can also attempt to glue the radiator. Of course, I'm joking…

Pros
  • Price/volume/speed. Metal body foundation for USB 3. The dimensions are short and thin. Stylish.
Cons
  • That should be 32022000000/1024/1024/1024 = 29.80 GB, however it is only 28.60 GB. 800 MB were lost. warm sensation when recording. Much reduced writing speed (probably from heating). It begins writing a complete file at 90 Mb/s, but after around 1 Gb, it abruptly drops to 20 Mb/s. Reading speed is decreased as well, but just slightly, from 130 to 90-100 Mb/s.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Good value for money, I recommend.

As it happens, I just finished a review of a 128 GB Silicon Power Marvel M01 flash drive. Reading large files consistently at this location is around 100 Gb/s, and writing any files is at 25 Mb/s, thus the speeds are considerably more consistent. Even while both flash drives are heated roughly the same, and maybe, the one used to read and the one used to write both begin and end with health, but not with peace. Silicon Power is somewhat more potent. This SanDisk flash drive is a bit more…

Pros
  • Large file reading speeds can be anywhere from 70 MB/s to 160 MB/s. It's still functional after only light use for a few months.
Cons
  • Large file reading speeds begin at around 150–160 MB/s but decline to around 70 MB/s after a few seconds (after reading around 3–4 GB). From 1-2 MB/s (and even less) to 50-60 MB/s, the rate at which small files are read varies wildly. The initial write speed is approximately 60 MB/s, or slightly higher; however, after recording approximately 2 GB, the write speed decreases to approximately 30–40 MB/s, and after recording an additional 2 GB, the write speed decreases to approximately 20 MB/s. While I don't find the lack of a cap to be particularly frightening, it is preferable that there be one.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product is completely satisfied, performs its functions.

Capacity 57.84 GB (~59,231 MB) In-Depth Evaluation of HWtestr 1.4 Reading speed: 97.5 MB/s Publish Rate: 22.7 MB/s The typical read speed is around 100 MB per second, and the typical write speed is around 22 MB per second. Important. For the following reasons, "quick" tests will reliably reveal increased velocity: The initial ~1 GB is written at 45-46 MB/s. Double the speed, to be exact. After then, the rate progressively drops (noticeably within 100-150 MB) and remains constant at 22-23…

Pros
  • affordable 64 GB USB 3.0 flash drive with lightning-fast read speeds
Cons
  • The prose moves at a leisurely pace. (About as good as USB 2.0 can get)

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Reliable purchase, guaranteed to be a good one.

The ability to quickly drive 5-30 GB apiece was less attractive to me than the high speed of writing little files, albeit in modest volumes, because I needed a flash drive to deal with papers. Unfortunately, at the time I was perplexed by this question, the original SanDisk Extreme 32 GB at a reasonable price had been discontinued. FAT32 preformatted 32GB flash disk. Using a Windows 10 Computer running USB 3.1 at speeds of up to 90 MB/s, I was able to create a 2.4 GB archive. Inadequate…

Pros
  • Great USB drive for documents up to 2 GB in size. You'll have to shop around for alternatives that offer a comparable write speed for little files, and they'll probably be quite pricey (higher capacity). A non-small file's average speed is 55 MB/s if the first gigabyte is recorded at 90 and the second at 20; there are few alternatives for the same price, and they will almost likely be larger in size. I can attest to the quality of SanDisk's warranty by saying that I've used another flash drive with which it was on par.
Cons
  • If you rarely need to write more than 2 GB at once, this flash drive is still great. By increasing one-time data recording capacity, the speed improves to good, then normal, and finally "you can find better" (for 4 GB, the speed will be (90 + 20 + 20) / 4 = 37.5 MB / s, etc.). It seems to me that OS and USB version make a big difference in transfer rates (3.0 or 3.1). My copy's read speed tops out at 135 MB/s even when using USB 3.1 and Windows 10, despite the package claiming 150.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

There are disadvantages, but the product is usable.

The temperature is rising quickly, but I don't foresee any implications. Someone in the reviews speculated that a sudden decrease in write speed might be caused by the controller overheating, but I was unable to detect this relationship. It acts exactly the same in both hot and cold conditions. Because of the small size and "inconspicuous" black and silver color, I nearly misplaced it a few times at first. I secured it with a big red keychain; it is no longer lost. There were no issues while

Pros
  • recording speed under 90 Mb/s with copy volume AT ONCE up to 1 GB (then drops to 10-12). Large files are consistently read at a rate of 110–130 Mb/s. Reliability. Previous to that, I purchased three flash drives in a row through the online store from different manufacturers; two of them "dead" within a day, and the third one did so after a week (this is not usual, is it?). This person has been working continuously for more than a year without receiving the tiniest critique, producing several GB of writing, reading, and overwriting practically every day.
Cons
  • It writes only a little bit more than 1 Gb of data when writing a lot of data at a respectable speed (70-90 Mb/s), and then the speed reduces to 10-12 Mb/s (2-3 times slower than my other USB-3 flash drive). The flash drive has to "rest" for at least a few minutes in order to regain its high write speed. Such a recording speed is just a disgrace for 32 GB of capacity (a full flash drive takes almost an hour even when copying large files of 1-5 GB). According to the reviews, EVERYONE DOES IT, yet the maker does not mention this feature for some reason. Or does it completely combine all examples of the model?

Revainrating 3 out of 5

There are several shortcomings, in principle, it corresponds to the norm.

some advantages 37Mb/s that's not a fountain clearly - the controller overheats and there is a dip in speed writing a huge file the first 400-500MB are written, and read speed is near to the advertised 130Mb/s on USB 3.0 125Mb/s on USB 2.0 also pleases USB 2.0 is capable of 20 Mb/s more than USB 3.0, while both USB 3.0 and USB 2.0 can write at 10 Mb/s. 3 Mb/s writes a number of little files, each weighing roughly a megabyte. List of negatives The impression of reliability is severely damaged by