Pros
- Not
Cons
- Flimsy construction, feels like it's about to fall apart Very low speed
Pros
- Small, compact, comfortable, there is a hole for the lace. Both interfaces work consistently well. DOES NOT HEAT as they write here, or I was lucky with a copy.
Cons
- Like everyone else - the speed does not correspond to the declared. I wrote 80 GB for an hour and a half. The average speed was 30Mb/s. Not to say that something is critical, but I would like in 2022 a little bit faster, at least three times.
Pros
- Type C works without problems. Not every connector 3.0 is defined.
Cons
- Does not work in connector 3.0 from the word at all! The laptop does not see it there at all! He sees it in 2.0, but he bought it because of the promised recording speed, which is not possible to realize . If the recording is interrupted at 2.0, it stops for a very long time.
Pros
- Basically I liked the design, I thought the quality would be worse, but live it is quite good.
Cons
- It heats up and consumes 60 mA in idle time, this is a fail . Any other flash drive connected via usb otg cord does not consume anything in idle time, but this one consumes just inserted, sadly. Perhaps this is a feature of the usb3 controller implemented in a small size, but for mobile devices this is very bad.
Pros
- the main convenience is the presence of two ports the speed is sufficient, especially for a versatile device compact size for a year there have never been problems with reading on dozens of devices
Cons
- the construction is flimsy, which is confirmed by the first fall
Pros
- Price (at the time of purchase was the lowest for type-C 3.0 64 GB), housing.
Cons
- Heating even when idle.
Pros
- The presence of both usb 3.2 gen1 (previously 3.0) and its full type-c version Linear read speed is at least 154MB/s on both slots Decent design. Pretty strong latch when extending the ports. The backlash of the connectors is within the normal range for flash drives. Reasonable price increase depending on volume.
Cons
- The write speed leaves much to be desired. The first 100 megabytes are written at ~43MB/s, after which the speed drops three times to ~13MB/s. I have a 16 GB version, but there may be a larger buffer size on larger models. The lever for extending the connectors is kind of flimsy. However, the design is quite simple, it will be possible to glue it if anything.
Pros
- - Good recording for a flash drive (46 Mbps) - When recording, the casing is barely warm (+ - 40 degrees)
Cons
- - The connector switching mechanism is not a fact that it will live for a very long time
Pros
- Two interfaces, the speed is large enough.
Cons
- NOT durable.
Pros
- two types of ports, size for carrying in your pocket.
Cons
- Structural flaws. Does not match the write speed.
Pros
- Convenient, no need to buy an adapter Does the job for which it was purchased
Cons
- Slow. It's just very slow compared to everything I've used lately Flimsy "switch" from USB-C to USB-A, you need to hold your finger to insert it into the system unit
Pros
- 2 USB-A + USB-C ports Large volume (256GB)
Cons
- Too big. Low write speed - up to 20mb/s
Pros
- The price is loyal, about 2500 for 256Gb received, comparable to the lost Sandisk Ultra 256 Gb flash drive, only here there is also a second Type-C port, which actually just became more relevant for me, because I have almost no micro usb left except for a tablet😁 . Not the worst thing I bought among flash drives. From the phone, the files are fast enough, none of the previously used ones worked faster.
Cons
- Frankly speaking, not even the reduced speed of work relative to the one promised by the manufacturer upset me in this purchase. The mechanism turned out to be the most flimsy, but you can adapt to its careful use. The movements were safer on the Sandisk Ultra, also with two connectors, but the principle of the "sled" differs a little, noticeable when working with it constantly. Here it seemed for the first couple of weeks that the last time she was moving forward and it was deceptive. Despite the fragility - it has not fallen apart yet, but now I have become even more accurate. The speed is at the level of -15-20% of the promised one, but sometimes with small portions of transfer and without small files - it becomes lightning fast on a computer, it works faster with a phone via type-c than with a computer.
