Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
stainless slicer ultra sharp cutter divider logo

Stainless Slicer Ultra Sharp Cutter Divider Review

2

·

Average

Revainrating 3.5 out of 5  
Rating 
3.7
🧂 Kitchen Utensils & Gadgets, 🍽️ Kitchen & Dining

View on AmazonView on ЯM

Media

(4)
img 1 attached to Stainless Slicer Ultra Sharp Cutter Divider
img 2 attached to Stainless Slicer Ultra Sharp Cutter Divider
img 3 attached to Stainless Slicer Ultra Sharp Cutter Divider
img 4 attached to Stainless Slicer Ultra Sharp Cutter Divider

Description of Stainless Slicer Ultra Sharp Cutter Divider

Large Size: Diameter up to 4.1 inches, suitable for most apple, pear, etc. ( Even with large apples ). Premium Material: Made of food-grade stainless steel, sturdy and durable. Easy to clean and dishwasher safe. Easy to Use: Apple slicer cuts the fruit into 8 uniform slices in one simple motion, can be used for most medium-sized fruits that are round in shape. Anti-Slip Handle: The wedgers are designed with anti-slip silicone handles for a comfortable grip. Product Warranty: We provide you with the best quality and most considerate service, if you are not satisfied, please feel free contact us.

Reviews

Global ratings 2
  • 5
    1
  • 4
    0
  • 3
    0
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    1

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A Kitchen Must-Have

This slicer is amazing! As my tests showed, it slices through vegetables like butter, creating perfectly even pieces every time .The ultra sharp blades make prep work a breeze and the stainless steel design is sleek and durable. It's a must-have in every home and kitchen..

Pros
  • Ultra sharp blades, sleek design, effortlessly slices vegetables.
Cons
  • None found.

Revainrating 1 out of 5

Sharp and durable cultivators

Cuts any apple easily. Cuts all the way so you don't have to hand force the last millimeter of the cut (which can cut your fingers). Durable, dishwasher safe (top rack).

Pros
  • Large size: up to 4.1" in diameter, fits most apples, pears etc (even large apples)
Cons
  • Not bad, but...