Transcend JetFlash Flash Drive TS32GJF370 Review

So that the cap would not get lost, I twisted a hole in it and connected it to the body with a cord. After two months of home use (computer TV cinema) it ceased to be detected. Treatment from the site did not help. Was forced to throw it away.

flash drive 32 GB jetflash 370 is very slow to write. It starts like good, about 30-35 mb/sec. But very quickly drops to 4 mb / sec. For large volumes, for example, when recording a dvd, it drops to 2 mb / sec. formatted to NTFS. Reads normally 15-17 mb / sec.

My verdict for the TRANSCEND Jetflash 370 32GB: apparently defective (which is unlikely) or cheaper (due to "stupid" component chips) batch. I believe that manufacturers decided to increase sales due to the low price tag in order to earn extra money in 2022 after the 2022 crisis. I will return this flash back (two weeks have not passed). I bought it on 06/09/2022, for 770. Has pros: 1) Beautiful packaging and design is not bad. 2) The reputation of the manufacturer (which began to fade in my…

I absolutely do not recommend buying. Wasted money! Judging by other recent reviews confirming my assessment, the manufacturer has reduced the cost of production and significantly worsened the performance of the model over the past year. Its pros: Beautiful, with a cap, relatively narrow and thin - does not interfere with flash drives in neighboring USB connectors. Doesn't heat up. Cons: Beautiful, with a cap, relatively narrow and thin - does not interfere with flash drives in neighboring…

I've been using it for 11 months now, so far so good. I record movies and favorite programs on the console, while everyone is happy

Do not panic. There is reliability (God forbid). Far Cry-3, played well with it, without delays. With formatting with 32kb cluster-disappeared delays and slowdowns in work, but the Zero parameters of the Random Record have not changed. The recommendation is in Information Storage. There is also 1 Transcend-8 Gb-lives 3 years, and the indicators Random Reading is similar (but slightly better). Reliability (god forbid) - better than: My fast flash drive died in 3 months.

Well suited for everyday file transfer tasks, as a bootable flash drive for installing operating systems and data backup / recovery systems. With its pros: 1) Relatively low price. 2) Good capacity/price ratio. 3) The USB 2.0 interface (not 3.0) allows you to use the flash drive as bootable on older computers that have problems booting from USB 3.0 flash drives. With its cons: 1) Unstable manufacturing quality of flash drives of this series and, as a result, low reliability. 2) Not all…

In the city of Hong Kong, 64-gig flash drives are in trouble. I found only in one non-online store, and then the 350 model, and then almost 900 more expensive than in the online store. I had to order there and wait a week, because the 350 did not suit the model - it is a little slower. Got pros: Good write speed (after formatting to NTFS in a "fast" way), the price is acceptable, it hasn't died yet), for such a volume (64 GB) it's very small in size, it doesn't look so hot at all, but when you…

I bought half a year ago, for 16GB, then the price was only 250. after analyzing the analogues available for sale, I chose this one, because. for the money gave a good speed. copies to it at 10 mb / s stably now it costs 400r, I'm going to order another one, though from another seller (where I bought it, it's already expensive). there was a need for another flash drive.

I am satisfied with the purchase. Decided to experiment with file systems FAT32, exFAT showed writing 9-10 MB / s, reading about 22 MB / s, but in exFAT my TV refused to read it. NTFS, to my surprise, recorded the first 80 seconds, then dropped to 40 and gradually decreased to 13 MB / s. Reading showed a gradual drop somewhere from 40 to 18 MB / s. If you format the base fat32 to ntfs, everything becomes generally fine

Bought for 32 GB for 799. I am surprised that in some reviews they write about the low speed, because of this I wanted to buy another flash drive, but probably fortunately it was no longer in the store and I had to take this one. I recorded a 2.9 GB folder from a laptop at a speed of 21 - 22 mv / s. I transferred this folder from a USB flash drive to a stationary computer - the speed was 24 -25 mV / s, I tried to copy the same folder back to the USB flash drive - the speed was almost stably 26…