Under Armour Launch Stretch Woven Shorts for Men - 7-inch Inseam Review

Extremely thin material. Paper. Huge wide belt which was weird but at least they aren't too long like an NBA basketball player.

Doesn't pick up too much grain when running through bushes. Day and night I run for miles through bushes and sewers. They work fine.

These shorts are very small and have an integrated thick underwear. They also look more like women's shorts than men's shorts.

I have several pairs of these. I went to buy more and they replaced the elastic with a thicker and firmer elastic. Not as comfortable as it fits well. look for old people.

High quality, breathable material, very comfortable. I love her. My only complaint is that the pockets are a little long, you can't do cardio with something in the pockets. Otherwise they are PERFECT. I will definitely buy again.

I had a hard time finding running shorts with a 7 inch inseam that weren't ridiculously expensive. When these Under Armor running shorts went on sale I ran to get them. I have a pair of UA shorts that I love, so I was confident in their fit and feel. I was not disappointed. I wish Under Armor would add a zipper to one of the side pockets, that would make them perfect.

Nice shorts, but wide elastic waistband was too tight. Size M: 29" unstretched; size chart says it should fit a 31 1/2 - 33 1/2 inch waist. But it didn't stretch enough to make it comfortable. Maybe ok for a 30-31 1 waist /2", no more. Also, the waistband didn't stretch enough to make the shorts easier to put on. Came back and got a more traditional elastic waistband from another brand with ruffles.

I had a hard time finding running shorts with a 7 inch inseam that weren't ridiculously expensive. When these Under Armor running shorts went on sale I ran to get them. I have a pair of UA shorts that I love, so I was confident in their fit and feel. I was not disappointed. I wish Under Armor would add a zipper to one of the side pockets, that would make them perfect.

Nice shorts, but the wide elastic waistband was a bit tight. Size M: 29" unstretched; size chart says it should fit a 31 1/2 - 33 1/2 inch waist. But it didn't stretch enough to make it comfortable. Maybe ok for a 30-31 1 waist /2", no more. Also, the waistband didn't stretch enough to make the shorts easier to put on. Came back and got a more traditional elastic waistband from another brand with ruffles.

I'm so tired of this "one size fits all" (size from the waistband to the crotch in the inseam length). In this short, medium-sized model, the pitch was 11.5 inches. Because of this, the 7-inch inseam of the leg was below the knee; In short, not what I was looking for in the gym. In addition, the material is very unusual. They don't call it nylon, so I have to agree with them, but this material struck me as a cross between the old 1970's short sneaker fabric and nylon socks (which absorb so much