- Size, power, adaptability, portability, and wall-mounted charging convenience
- Blister forms on the index finger of the right (productive) hand; battery performance drops by half after two years. I spent about $4,000 on a Chinese knockoff instead of $9,000 for a brand new battery, but it only lasted six months before completely dying.
- Utilizes very little storage space. Just recently cleared
- No ergonomics. And the materials, in and of themselves, raise serious concerns about the product's quality.
- Design makes it simple to clear the shelves of dust.
- useless in terms of money.
- All of these characteristics—compactness, mobility, cleaning ease, noise level, absence of wires, and nozzles—are appropriate and required.
- NO
- Nothing.
- Unfit for high-quality cleaning. A good electric broom all around. The candy wrapper does not, however, become raised off the ground by the metal clip. Paying for routine cleaning is insufficient.
- It does a better and more thorough job of cleaning than a regular vacuum cleaner, particularly on carpets and other surfaces made of fabric. If you saw it in real life, you would never guess that there could be THAT MUCH dust there. After eating, it is very simple to swiftly remove crumbs from the floor, sand from shoes in the corridor, hair in the bathroom, and other tiny items.
- They could have manufactured the casing out of something other than Deshman plastic for 45,000 rupees; the connection of the pipe to the body of the vacuum cleaner should have been made of metal; as it is, the connection is quite sloppy, causes backlash, and does not instill much trust. When the dust collector is removed, the same thing happens: everything becomes loose, it cracks and creaks, and it gives the impression that it is about to die:)
- Drops OK
- Removal method for containers is a pain
- powerful, manageable, lightweight, with a charge that lasts for numerous cleanings, easily replaceable nozzles, and using up little room.
- noisy, and until it is formed, cleaning the basket is rather tough
- adequate housekeeping
- started working a few months ago for 1 minute at maximum speed.
- Power Absence of wires and hoses A dust collector with a focus on weight cleaning quality design
- See comments
- There's no limit to the number of items you can list! Advantages include being lightweight, stylish, and functional.
- The cost, but the results are worth it.
- Easy to transport, transport, and maneuver; forceful; no "vacuum spirit" (unpleasant smell of heated dust during cleaning)
- In my perspective, the hefty cost is justified.
- It's light but mighty. really lightweight, yet surprisingly potent. It can be used as the sole vacuum in the home.
- Suction strength, nozzle count, ease of filter maintenance, and mobility
- It seems heavy, unusual, and the main attachments might not fit under some furniture.
- Finally, a fire vacuum cleaner that is lightweight and powerful! Carpets with a short but very dense pile, meaning that dust, dirt, hair, and wool in the pile get stuck with a bang, are present throughout the apartment (three bedrooms plus a hallway). I vacuumed 50 squares with this "space blaster" in all, which took me around 10 minutes. Power-wise, the first speed had more than enough to "comb" everything clean.
- The absence of a flat nozzle is the sole negative, as there are locations where round nozzles cannot pass due to height restrictions and small ones only provide a short angle of inclination to completely remove all dust and grime.