Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 35
  • 5
    25
  • 4
    3
  • 3
    4
  • 2
    1
  • 1
    2

Type of review

Used these tires for 3 seasons. Mercedes car, dimension 235/50/19. Basically exploited the car in Hong Kong, also during the operation was 5 trips Hong Kong-Hong Kong-Hong Kong. Mostly driving style is calm, but sometimes it happened that he was driving fast. On serpentines, in heavy rain, excellent handling. Generally handling on wet roads surprised and very pleased. I did not expect such a tread pattern to remove water so well. Subjectively, in heavy rain on a very wet track, these tires…

Pros
  • Quiet, excellent performance in hot weather and in the rain. Production Japan.
Cons
  • Didn't find any deficiencies

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A good quality product, I rate this purchase perfectly.

They were bought to replace the regular Pirelli Pzero, after its last generation was discontinued. Due to the rare size on the rear axle - 285/30/19 - the choice was quite small, between the old versions of the Continental (which were immediately dismissed), oak bridges and PSS Michelin. I looked at specialized sites with reviews and reviews and settled on these: the homologation of tires for my particular car model and the outrageous cost of PSS at 26k per piece for the rear axle at that time…

Pros
  • Speed, handling and tenacity are surprisingly quite on par with default UHP rubber manufacturers like Pirelli, Michelin or Continental. Durable - do not catch hernias and wear acceptable. With the drainage of water, everything is also fine.
Cons
  • Noisy, it's true. It is clear that the low profile, it is clear that conditionally "sporty" - but the noise is noticeably stronger than analogues. Noticeable difference in handling between warm and cold states.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Exactly as promised by the manufacturer, high quality.

Because rubber is soft, which has a positive effect on its merits, there is a weak wear resistance. With a rather driving style of driving with an interference fit, it lasted 3 seasons. If it wasn't so expensive now, I would buy it again.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

It functions perfectly, nothing unusual.

I bought tires in size 225/45/17. Car bmw 330 E46, it so happened that I installed these tires immediately after buying a car. Went through the entire chassis, repaired the rail, changed the discs - only after replacing the rubber, I realized that the problems were due to her! Rubber is excellent, but very hard and apparently does not work on the "sharp" steering and stiff suspension bmw.

Pros
  • Derzhak crazy, wet/dry asphalt anyway, goes into any turn! On a good cover just a song! I would say that for such money she has no equal, but.
Cons
  • it is worth going to a track or light off-road (which in our country is considered 80% of the road surface) and HORROR! The car is simply uncontrollable, it “dances” in rows, the steering wheel knocks out of your hands, in order to drive holding the steering wheel with one hand in a relaxed state, you can forget, not to mention arranging “races”! HORROR HORROR HORROR!

Revainrating 2 out of 5

I didn't like it, I don't recommend buying.

I drive a brand new VW Jetta, the interior had dunlop sp sport fastresponse 205/55 r16 tires, it seemed very rolled, after looking at the new items I came across the Yokohama Advan Sport V105, I read a lot about it, but because there were no new rubber reviews, I decided to crack and in vain, I regretted that I had sold the old tires, it was not comfortable to drive a car, the new tires were buzzing and the noise was such in the cabin that it seemed like I was eating with the windows open, the…

Pros
  • Ordinary oak tires, not for those who prefer a comfortable ride.
Cons
  • Noisy, hard rubber.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I didnt expect the quality to be so high.

I liked it, I immediately appreciated the quality, my old tires were already 6 years old :)))))) in comparison with these old people, any new one will surprise, but I already have a two-season experience with this rubber. Management has become better, it clings to the road perfectly, it is soft, bumps are not felt particularly, but it does not swim from the heat either. I traveled long distances more than once, no hernias, no bumps, or any other problems with strength. I give this tire 5 out of

Pros
  • Driven, grip, soft
Cons
  • Didn't notice any cons

I use size 225/45 R18 on a Mazda 6. Excellent handling, excellent grip, I like the rigidity of the line - the balance between handling and comfort is well chosen, there are no problems with aquaplaning. There was a Nankang NS-2 before it, the cord was stiffer and at first I was disappointed, but after a couple of weeks I realized that the taxiing was still excellent, but there was much more comfort.

Pros
  • Manageability, hook on asphalt, moderately hard sidewall.
Cons
  • Noise level is average.

Comparing the V105 with the V103, Yokohama is heading in the right direction. The tires have really gotten better. It holds a little better in the dry, an order of magnitude better in the wet than the previous Advan Sport model. The sidewall has become a little rounder and softer, as a result, rutting is felt much less. The composition of the rubber itself also became a little softer, it warms up faster, at a temperature of +10 it behaves quite tolerably (V103 at +10 was like plastic). At the…

Pros
  • Derzhak on wet asphalt, behaves well on hot asphalt in a warm state. Rigid sidewall - excellent feedback, less "wool", quite responsive, no hernias, although a couple of times the discs bent in the pits.
Cons
  • Noisy, I would like more dry grip.

I took 235/50/zr17 (Ford galaxy2) there was nothing else for that kind of money in this size, and even a friend praised the previous v103 model. After changing shoes from winter Velcro, Bridzhikov seemed noisy. Regarding the very rapid wear of the tread: this particular model does not suffer from this - this is more true for v103. The general impressions were positive. Compared to the previous michelin primacy3, it is in no way inferior to it. It fully works out its money

Pros
  • Handling and predictability in any weather, very tenacious, especially rain is her element
Cons
  • If only noisy, although I think it will not be critical on a car with good noise

In the price category 4k (205/55 r16) I settled on it on the advice of a very experienced person (he sells tires for half his life). Again, even the fact that it is recommended for use in the primary equipment of cars speaks in its favor: Mercedes-Benz SL (R231), Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172), Mercedes-Benz CLS (C218), Mercedes-Benz C Class (W204 ) as of March 2022. If you want soft and quiet rubber is not for you. If you need 100% control - then what you need.

Pros
  • Rubber is good. On dry rides perfectly, the track is almost not annoying. In the rain on the highway confidently rode 110-140, but in a rut already sykotno. I don’t drive around the city more than 120, in these aisles the braking is more than ok, there are no problems with rebuilding either. It is not realistic to start a car into a skid (I drive a Civic).
Cons
  • Noisy

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Just super, it's beautifully made, I'm very happy with it.

Great tires with a sporty feel. Those who write about the lack of comfort bought the wrong tires for themselves. This is a chic sports hard rubber, with excellent grip with the road surface, both during acceleration and braking. Before it was Dunlop Sport Maxx, installed by default. The car on those tires wobbled a little left and right compared to Yokohama. On Yoke we feel much better.

Pros
  • Road grip is her forte!
Cons
  • Indeed, as many write, I note the noise. But! It is present only on granular asphalt.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great value for money, one of the best offers.

Tried everything except China and Korea. Michelin touches, but this one is more interesting. Works at 100 after warming up, and it comes after a dynamic ride. In the cold, it behaves like adrenaline from the bridge, and once you warm up the toe is very impressive. Water. what is it?! It just slows down the speed. In corners, the handle is very powerful (see warming up the rubber). To be honest, don't take it! I will get more)))

Pros
  • Don't take it or I won't get it
Cons
  • Little noise. Sensitivity to the track, but in my size it is the norm.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

The product is usable, I expected a bit more.

205/55/16, front wheel drive. This rubber was highly praised by friends, then the seller in the store. The few reviews on the Internet were only positive. Took in the spring of 2022 Bottom line: disappointment. This tire did not live up to my expectations. 1. Noisy. I go to the "German", the noise and then penetrate into the cabin. In wet weather, the noise increases. On the street it was somehow +5 and it was raining, I drove off, the rubber just started to hum, when I picked up speed, the…

Pros
  • Price. Good rolling. Good handling in dry and warm weather.
Cons
  • Rigidity, noise, hydroplaning

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best I ever used, recommend it to everybody.

Took on BMW F30 328i xDrive in size 245/35 275/30 R19 Very happy with the tires, worth the money. As an alternative, I considered the Michelin Pilot Super Sport, they are close in performance. I took Yokohama Advan Sport v105 and I am 100% satisfied with the choice. I drove 1 season at 200+ km/h every day (I drive far along the highway) - the flight is normal, it steers perfectly at high speeds, the responsiveness is at altitude, it doesn’t hit the teeth on bumps (softer than R18 RunFlat…

Pros
  • Excellent tires. Holds the road like it's on rails. At high speeds 200+ keeps excellent. It clings well even at near-zero temperatures. Total: - manageability - directional stability
Cons
  • In the rain in a rut, it can plan (but most likely in a rut in the rain, anyone behaves like this)