Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS 📷 II SLR Lens - White Box Edition Review

If you take an entry-level carcass a la 1100D and don’t know what you want from photography at all or don’t want anything at all, and you just need a camera to take pictures for your home archive and that’s it, this lens is enough for you. Then buy something like 55-250 for shooting birds in the park and you will be just happy. For serious tasks, this glass is no longer enough, I have been shooting with it exactly since the time when I bought my first DSLR in 2022 - 600D and it was there as a…

I have had this lens for (attention!) MORE THAN 8 YEARS, I bought it together with a canon 500d carcass, where it just didn’t go, and on the beaches, and in the snow, and in the rain I ran with it, photographed the night sky, it just (ugh -pah-pah) indestructible, with good sharpness for its time and class, I rarely saw soap)) Maybe it just turned into the category of love for this lens, but I started with it, I studied on it, and I'm still learning ) If you are thinking of starting taking…

There was a mistake made in the lens characteristics; the maximum viewing angle is not 64 degrees and 30 minutes, but rather the usual angle for Canon EF-S glasses at the short 18 millimeter end is 74 degrees and 20 minutes.

Sharing unbiased user insights. Canon focuses for a long time, looks cheap, frivolous (Nikon looks more solid), only if you took it complete with a carcass.

Has some pros: Normal glass is definitely not great, but since it was in a whale, it’ definitely 5 stars. Cons: Arising from the price: 1 There is not enough minimum and maximum zoom for everyday use.

Friends! I'm not an experienced photographer, one came with the EOS1100D) he is no better than this, no better! Thought maybe a fix? I tried Samyang 14 2.8 and even worse, because it is less harsh! It is clear that from a tripod they can give the same result (which I'm not sure about), but this lens turned out to be better from hands (it is much sharper in the depth of field zone, maybe stabilization contributed to this) I didn’ evaluate it myself, but I like it))) If anything, process them, I…

As the lens included in the kit, I do not advise you, now you can find much better, without knowing any problems, if possible, it is better to take a kit with an 18-135 lens, the quality is almost the same,

(the main thing is to be sober) it makes an elk 17-40 on the crop 0&APIComp=0) It is important that it weighs little, Here you can see what you can shoot with it: http://35 The lens is not for portrait shooting, Optically it is very good.

I changed it to a more universal zoom, but I can’t say that it didn’t suit me, it just became not enough, Ru/users/baf762/view/462927/? page=0

Its pros: Lightweight, ated image stabilizer, good aperture, good picture over the entire range of focal lengths Some cons: The front lens can be slightly twisted by hand in autofocus mode and focus is knocked out, rather noisy, plastic bayonet mount

Some pros: If the Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II is seen as a beginner's test lens rather than a serious lens, then it has plenty of merit. Some cons: If you compare the Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II with medium and good lenses, then you can’t list all the shortcomings - there are too many.

Got pros: 1. optical qualities 2. the presence of a macro mode 3. Variable focus can be used for zooming, which is convenient for macro shooting Different cons: due to design features, it is not always mechanically compatible with optical extenders

A good model, but not much else. Even very much, taking into consideration that I got it for free (like a whale): the bare minimum price for a carcass was the same as the price for a whale. I want to emphasize the 18mm focal length in particular because there will come a moment when you think this lens is terrible, you will want to have fixes, and then you will realize that in order to have a wide-angle fix, you will need to pay more than 10,000 dollars. I would consider purchasing such a lens

If you have the opportunity to buy a kit with an stm-marked lens, even if it’s a couple of thousand more expensive, then take it without thinking, you won’t regret it, this is still yesterday. Has some pros In kit almost nothing comes out. Quite well made. Acceptably draws, unless of course you print a photo the size of a house. It is not a pity, you can experiment as much as you like. Got cons: The front lens rotates when focusing. It is inconvenient to use with a CPL filter and a figured…

I do not advise you to consider it as a staff member "for all occasions". But with the camera, the lens is good. For the first DSLR it is! Its pros: Light weight, range of focal lengths suitable for different purposes (landscape, portrait, although you still need a different lens for the latter type of shooting). As for the quality of the picture, it all depends on the knowledge and talent of the photographer. With its cons. In my opinion, a significant drawback is an uncomfortable focus ring…

For beginners - just a godsend. Especially for such money. I advise! Its pros: - sharp enough - inexpensive - universal - light (because plastic) - fast autofocus - performed well at wide angles (landscapes) - stabilizer - suitable for video shooting - cheap and cheerful - for beginners - the most it Some cons: - the lens is the most budgetary and hence all the consequences - the presence of chromatic aberrations and distortion - collects dust - rare, but misses with AF - not very…

If we discard all prejudices that the whale is an ashtray, not a lens, and seriously get down to business, it's a great thing, the main thing is the pictures, and not the pathos of the red stripe! Got pros: Cheapness with sufficient image quality, compared to the old version without a stabilizer, this one simply works wonders. The colors are pale, but you don’t shoot on film) Photoshop for what? Excellent sharpness, good autofocus, I almost never focus manually. Its cons: Plastic! But the…

For beginners - just a godsend. Especially for such money. I advise! Some pros: - sharp enough - inexpensive - universal - light (because plastic) - fast autofocus - performed well at wide angles (landscapes) - stabilizer - suitable for video shooting - cheap and cheerful - for beginners - the most it With its cons. - the lens is the most budgetary and hence all the consequences - the presence of chromatic aberrations and distortion - collects dust - rare, but misses with AF - not…

Ideal for subject photography. Suitable as the first lens on which you can learn to photograph. Given the low cost of this lens, it is not scary to shoot a rally with it, where stones, water splashes, mud and other shooting in extreme conditions can fly in, which means you can get very interesting shots! If he got it along with the camera, then I do not advise him to sell it, it is better to leave it for extreme sports, objects and as a landscape painter.

I don't understand why so many people hate him. But this whale, despite the price, is very, very good! Sharpness at the level, focal most convenient for reporting. You can shoot landscapes and portraits (despite the fact that it is dark). The joke is that it leads better at 18-20 mm than many very expensive widths on these focal lengths. There are distortions, but they are correct and do not disfigure people. Having fixes, I can say that on similar apertures, the differences are only in the…