Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Navruza Saitkulova photo
İstanbul
4 Level
306 Review
868.75 Karma

Review on ANON by Navruza Saitkulova

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Everything may not be what it seems, research this.

Overview
The project looks like it was sent in 2018. This means sending a security and masternode-enabled digital currency, mostly aimed at expanding Bitcoin and other cryptographic currency advances. The group includes Jake Greenbaum as its author and experts such as Steven Nerayoff, Eli Blatt, and Ran Neu-Ner. Like money, ANON allows the payer and creditor to remain unknown during the exchange. In any case, clients should have the option to specifically anonymize network exchanges using zk-SNARKs. Even so, this topic is being studied. Moreover, as indicated in the group's cases, the secure addresses, balances and changes of the task must be kept secret and untraceable. The use of unprotected deliveries seems to allow additional adjustments and changes to be made in a simple way. This allowed the organization to maintain a protected balance ledger without disclosing customers or related amounts. Instead of distributing the spend confirmation and change estimates, the exchange metadata is mixed and done by all accounts using zk-SNARKs to demonstrate the reliability of adjustments and coin supply. Likewise, the masternode rewards part of the frame rewards to admins and allows admins to decide on bids suggested by the local area. It is possible to see what he gives. Proposals can be made with an infinite supply of 100 ANONS, and once accepted, these bids drive the setup of superblocks to support tertiary activities. While formative control options have a place in the group, the local area can directly influence the initiative through proposals and the democratic cycle.
In my opinion
Although the project still has thousands of active users, I am worried about using it. Because I saw that there are no features that are said to be brought to the website. In addition, even though the token was of high value when it was first launched, it suddenly declined, and I was not sure it would happen again. Also, according to the website, the token is said to be listed on several exchanges, but as a result of my long research I have seen that it only trades on one. So, in short, I will continue to watch it for now to find more accurate information



Pros
  • there are thousands of users
  • The developer team is a well-known team that has been involved in many projects
Cons
  • There is no transaction volume
  • suddenly its value dropped 10 times
  • The features that are said to be brought in are still not available for use
  • only traded on one stock exchange