Review on Bitcoin Plus by Muhammet Hotjaowezow

Satoshi Nakamoto's cryptographic structure from peer Bitcoin. Proof-action changes jobs to ensure much of network security. The pictures below of this hybrid design are designed to provide the first booklet and are not important in the long run. The social security process does not rely on long-term energy consumption, so it offers cryptocurrency to its energy-saving and more cost-effective competitive friends. These proofs are based on the age of the coin and are generated by a faster scheme. similar, but the Bitcoin search space is limited. Since the inception of Bitcoin (Nakamoto 2008), evidence of work has been the mainstay of peer-to-peer cryptography. Proof of performance has become a pillar of block creation and a security version of Nakamoto’s design. The idea of ​​a coin can facilitate an alternative to the so-called "proof" of Bitcoin's operating system. This document at the same time formalizes the design used to build the cryptocurrency protection version and part of the block creation method, and the evidence of the work allows mainly the preliminary part of the block introduction. It moves and gradually decreases its importance. This structure attempts to demonstrate the viability of cryptocurrencies from a peer-to-peer point of view that does not depend on consumption. The concept of cash was considered the lowest in Nakamoto in 2010, and although Bitcoin currently does not play an important role in the security version, it was also used in Bitcoin to prioritize transactions. The age of the coins is best determined by the duration of the currency. The best example to catch is that if Bob took 10 coins from Alice and kept them for 90 days, Bob could collect 900 cash a day. In addition, when we spend the 10 coins Bob received from Alice, we say that the age of the money Bob collected with these 10 coins was spent or destroyed. Evidence from the court has helped Nakamoton achieve great success, but evidence of the case shows that cryptocurrency depends on energy consumption and therefore a significant increase in the cost of operating those systems. On the one hand, through the sum of users ’inflation and operating costs. As the amount of bread in the Bitcoin community slows, there may be pressure to increase transaction fees to maintain the desired level. It begs the question of whether or not it takes energy to grow in order to become a decentralized cryptocurrency? Thus, it is a theoretically and technologically important step to show that equal security of cryptocurrencies does not depend on energy consumption. Since 2011, the so-called anti-interest rate has been debated among Bitcoin circles. The age of the coin spent on the transaction may take into account the type of evidence. The original authors discovered the Peercoin white paper, the concept of confirmation, and the age of the coin in October 2011, so they realized that it could replace the highest level of evidence. Proof of labor by carefully reconstructing the Bitcoin publishing and protection model. Evidence of the latest types of blocks is a unique transaction called a coin (called a Bitcoin Special Transaction Coin). In a blocked block, the enterprise pays for the coin age by creating a block for the community and gaining an advantage to approve the share. The first entry of a coin is called a nucleus, and it is essential that the formation of protection blocks conform to a polo-positive hash-based protocol in order for it to become a stochastic system like old blocks. However, the most important difference is made in the context of a limited search (rather, a hash at the output of the wallet) instead of an unlimited search topic, which includes proof of the washing operation, pictures. miles associated with extensive expenditure. The hashtag that the Ernadro Center should follow is the coin age (coin day) spent on the kernel (instead of the Bitcoin images that have the target value used in each node of Bitcoin). Thus, the extra money you spend on the kernel will be difficult to solve. Personal Protocol. For example, if Bob has an old 12-month old bag and expects to supply the nuclear in 2 days, Elisa can expect the 2-hundred-pen bag to produce nuclear in 2 days.