Review on VENA by SERDAR SEYLİYEV
No explanation or innovation has been found recently.
The logic of the project to work in the market is to make it more common by lending to users and making a refund with their own token. However, although it has been on the market for a long time, it does not seem to have succeeded.
When I visited the website, I came across great designs. However, it is not that successful in terms of user interface. Because it looks very complicated. There are no explanations or tutorials about some features. Therefore, I do not recommend users who are new to the project to try every feature.
There is a roadmap like other such projects, but they have not made any progress in the roadmap since 1 year ago. This situation worried me. I wanted to hear from the support team about these issues, but unfortunately I couldn't find a link. Social media accounts are not active.
I saw users' reviews on some complaint platforms and was undecided about the credibility of the project. Because some users made claims that the project was abandoned. For this reason, I do not plan to invest for now.
Although the token is listed on several exchanges, its value is very low and the daily trading volume is very small. Yet there are millions of cryptocurrencies in circulation.
In general, the project seems to have been abandoned for reasons I do not know, and it seems to have stopped the service now. The website works but this could be a scam.
Pros
- It offers services in the TRX network.
- When it first entered the market, it reached a large user base.
- It is possible to see the token in several exchanges.
- web design is impressive.
Cons
- I have doubts about reliability.
- very difficult to use.
- no progress has been made recently.
- its value is very low.
- The daily use of the token is very small.
