Review on Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L ll USM Zoom Lens: Optimized Performance for Canon EF Cameras by EN Tien ᠌

someone wrote that 17-40 is no worse, but still 4 and 2.8 is a significant difference, so for landscapes - maybe 17-40, for everything - only 16-35. undoubtedly good for reporting and for staging. I use it on the second five, I squeeze out the full focal length - in a beautiful St. Petersburg entrance it takes 2 floors calmly Pros below: only the angle, but I agree that the angle is not a virtue, but a characteristic. angle plus zoom Different cons: blurs the picture. and sometimes abruptly, sometimes the soap is terrible. but it rather depends on the instance. draws terribly. only good for landscapes because of the pattern