The selection in 275/65 R17 is not particularly wide. With its cutting-edge tread, Michelin scared off potential customers. Nokian SUV stood in front of it, and the Japanese were quickly rejected because to their renowned stiffness. In light of the fact that the car, despite being a heavy 4x4, spends 99.9% of its time on asphalt, I ultimately decided to go with the Conti and have never looked back. After Nokian (a strong middle peasant, by the way), the car was noticeably quieter, pavement stones and potholes were not observed, and there was a sense of suppleness. Rutting doesn't feel like anything. It doesn't float in the rain (although it's too early to discuss this because the protection is new), and the handling in turns has been significantly improved. There are often no issues with road tires, and there is reason to think that the tire's performance in light soil won't be a failure. The previous LX is much softer, according to the previous author. If that's the case, this is a bomb! I'm reading my evaluation from six years ago. I choose to switch to a new pair of shoes in the following size, keeping in mind how quietly and smoothly this tire ran: V speed index, 285x60 R18. Guys, don't mention how buzzy she is! Yes, when driving at a high altitude on a rough road. However, the rumble around 80-105 km/h is just terrible! But the primary cruising speed mode is this. Additionally, it obliterates both the newest and the oldest asphalt. The Czech Republic produced pressure is normal. Overall, I'm really disappointed! Much quieter was the older Toyo. Generally negative. The hum vanished after 10–15 thousand kilometers. Confidence endures. The tires appear to be worn out. Good!