Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Kiyoshi Sakade ᠌ photo
Kyoto
1 Level
112 Review
130 Karma

Review on Renewed Samsung Galaxy A50 Verizon Smartphone in Black with 64GB Storage by Kiyoshi Sakade ᠌

Revainrating 3 out of 5

The purchase was not entirely successful, there were minor problems in use.

I don’t understand reviewers from well-known resources who write about the ideal almost balanced smartphone. This is not true. I'll start with the positives. -Screen. It's not bad at all, it has a budget FHD + resolution. Color reproduction is good, tactile sensations are normal. -All communications (bluetooth version 5, Wi-Fi, and others) work perfectly. -Finally, a separate, not combined, installation of 2 sim cards and flash memory. -Selfie camera is quite suitable for video calls and sometimes selfies -Standard Samsung interface, I like it. -In general, the smartphone itself is smart, there are almost no complaints about the work. And now the cons. -The biggest downside is the camera. And if during the day she shoots all right, then as soon as the illumination drops, she starts shooting like a huawei for 4 There are 3 cameras here, I don’t understand - why sculpt 3 cameras (essentially for 2 effects, one of which can be done by gluing, and the second in Photoshop), it would be better to put one but good, at least the level of former flagships like S7 or S8 and would have made a sane photo editor with the addition of that notorious "Bokeh". Image detail is very poor. -Smartphone size. If the screen itself with a stretch can be called acceptable in size, then the huge frames add a centimeter in length and half a centimeter in width. Why so many? As a result, the smartphone looks just clumsy. -Frankly cheap case material. There are no comments here. -Fingerprint often does not recognize fingers, although other smartphones did not have these problems. -The face is also poorly recognized, and when it is urgently needed, it writes that it is not detected, and when it is not needed, it unlocks, although the smartphone is not even directed at the face. -Sound. He just is. After my S8 on the A50, I stopped listening to music through good wired monitor headphones. Because it turns out just a sound, without detail, without bottoms and tops. flat boring sound In general, this is such an ambiguous smartphone. To whom the camera and processor are not important - take the A40 better.

Pros
  • With all discounts and trade-in cost 6 All modern interfaces, the camera for video calls is normal. Separate slots for 2 sim cards and micro-cd.
Cons
  • The camera is just awful. Sound (it just is, but no more) Huge frames, especially from the bottom, hence the large size of the smartphone. Not a high pixel density, in the model the price is lower and the index (a40) is even higher, just a paradox. The processor is a version of the flagship cut down in frequency, which is obviously why some applications, including contacts / dialing, think for a couple of seconds when opened.

Similar reviews