Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Mura Mura Chun ᠌ photo
Hanoi
1 Level
143 Review
246 Karma

Review on πŸ”‹ Ansmann AA 2850 Hybrid Rechargeable Batteries - High Capacity, Low Discharge by Mura Mura Chun ᠌

Revainrating 1 out of 5

The product is of poor quality, I don't recommend it.

Batteries are a disgrace, there is no question of any quality. Maybe, of course, I ran into a fake, but I very much doubt that they are even faked. For they themselves are fakes for well-known capacious batteries. So, the initial basic charge-discharge was at first from 2022 to 2200 mAh of each of the 4 batteries I purchased. After 5 charge-discharge cycles, the capacity rose by another 10% to 2200-2400 mAh and stopped there. Declared 2850 - no trace! This is not so bad, one could somehow put up with the loss of capacity, BUT: after a full charge, I measured the capacity after 2.5 days - one battery showed less than 1000 mAh, the rest from 1100 to 1400 mAh! In another week - with such a trend, it will be completely empty banks! It's just a disgrace! IN NO EVENT WOULD I RECOMMEND SUCH GARBAGE FOR PURCHASE! After 1 month of infrequent use, one battery lost 70% of its capacity from the original to 700mAh ! All the others didn't budge.

img 1 attached to πŸ”‹ Ansmann AA 2850 Hybrid Rechargeable Batteries - High Capacity, Low Discharge review by Mura Mura Chun ᠌

ο»Ώ

Pros
  • Are missing completely
Cons
  • Capacity lower than declared by 20-30% The charge is kept for no more than 2-3 days, then catastrophic degradation up to 30-50% of the declared capacity

Comments (2)

Please, sign in to write a comment
January 27, 2023
Has pros: I used the previous batteries periodically for 3 years (in the camera). Of course, I did not count the number of reloads, but they served faithfully. Has some cons Relatively fast self-discharge - after a break in work for at least 4-5 days, recharging is necessary
January 27, 2023
I haven't used any other brands so I have nothing to compare to.