Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Aneta Kuchter ᠌ photo
1 Level
165 Review
0 Karma

Review on Continental ContiSportContact 5 215/50 R17 95W summer by Aneta Kuchter ᠌

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I was surprised by the quality for this price.

The tires are excellent (only not runflat), I will definitely buy myself the same one, since at speeds over 120 km / h the car is very well controlled and slows down. Reliable rubber, made in Germany. Got pros: Good grip on dry and wet roads, acoustic driving comfort, fuel economy. I have been using BMW F 30 for the last 2 seasons - 2022. and 2022 At the same time, in 2022 went on runflat, and in 2022. Bought the same, but ordinary. The normal ones are very comfortable. In 2022 in the summer I went twice to the Crimea, where the quality of the roads is poor. I drove fast on the road - not lower than 120 km / h, while there were no hernias after trips, and the consumption along the highway averaged 4.9 liters of solarium per 100 km. When driving on conventional tires, fuel consumption is less - by about 0.5 liters. per 100 km., respectively higher on the runflat. Once, while driving along the highway at a speed of 160 km / h, a drunken pedestrian came from somewhere and began to cross the road. right in front of the car. I braked to 0 - while the rubber did not even squeak and the abs did not work. With its cons: The softness of the ride disappears when you ride on the same tires, but with the run-flat system. The car jumps on bumps, the interior starts to creak, fuel consumption increases. But on a flat road, this is not felt. Yes, the price is still high. On the run-flat for 20,000 km, the rear tires were worn out to the limit, and on regular tires of the same model for the second season - 35,000 km. the rear ones were worn out not reaching 2mm to the limiter (I immediately inform you that I did not rearrange the wheels from the rear to the front during operation). .

Similar reviews