Review on Renewed Samsung Galaxy A50 Verizon Smartphone in Black with 64GB Storage by Andrey Orlovski ᠌

1. My 4000 mAh battery-equipped phones performed far better (charged only at night, A50 charged both at night and during the day). 2. The statements claim that the amoled screen consumes less energy than IPS, but not in this phone. 3. Achieving. In games, my Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro performed significantly better. A50 (which didn't throttle, warmed up considerably less, or consume the charge like it wasn't me). 4. There are several phones that photograph significantly better than this model for under $20,000; 4. In general, I will continue to support Huawei and Honor (but I will never force my views on others). I tried to give Samsung a chance because I wanted to, but I won't. Samsung made an attempt at the intermediate market, but it did not turn out well. They are still unsure on how to create a middle segment and budget. Although my friend S10 + has a great one, I did not find the A50 to be satisfactory. I believe that $20,000 can be used much more wisely. In any event, the decision is ultimately up to you; I have just offered my perspective and don't purport to speak for all people. Good luck!