Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Bogdan Panov ᠌ photo
1 Level
245 Review
0 Karma

Review on AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AM4 Processor with Wraith Stealth Cooler (YD1600BBAFBOX) - 65W Energy Efficiency by Bogdan Panov ᠌

Revainrating 4 out of 5

It is of good quality, but I won't buy it again.

Scroll to the bottom if you don't want to read this doodle =) from i5 2500k moved. Although the previous processor was excellent, it was both ethically and physiologically out of date. The reds won the choice. I don't regret doing this at all; it was motivated by the hype, AMD PR, and Intel policy (when they provided reviewers guidelines on how to view this stone). The stone has proven to be highly effective; it is sufficient for all duties, including games. Overclocking gives off a mixed impression. The stone severely resists taking a frequency above 3.6 with a voltage of 1.4 volts from beneath the bios. Additionally, its frequency is 2.2. Fuck is aware of what it is. He is aggressively pursuing up to 4.1 with a proprietary utility. Under stress, it is pursuing up to 4 GHz in regular mode. It's completely inaccurate when it comes to temps. I have a NZXT socket adapter for a CBO h115i. And the highest temperature I ever recorded on sweltering summer days—yes, they will return in a year—was 61C. I forgot to note that this stone and the rest of its family are very receptive to working with high frequency bars in the midst of all the fuss. To sum up: - The stone is strong - The stone demands RAM The stone is heated, and it is unclear. 7 out of 10 Intel reviewers were paid

Pros
  • - Tears in synthetic tests - Low-cost multi-threaded and multi-core CPU - Effectively chases up to 4.1 MHz. - A mostly respectable showing
Cons
  • There are numerous programs and apps that have not been optimized for new processors and are dependent on high-frequency RAM.

Similar reviews