Review on Tire Michelin Primacy 4 225/60 R17 99 V by Boban Danilovski ᠌

Name: Tire Michelin Primacy 4 225/60 R17 99 V
Item: Tire Michelin Primacy 4 225/60 R17 99 V
Rating: 5

July 06, 2023

The best thing I've ever used, I recommend it to everyone!

The Michelin Primacy 4 205/55 R16 91V tires are what I ride on during the second season. I removed Ceed from the passenger compartment and put Hankook Ventus Prime2 tires on it. I drove it for six years despite the fact that it was difficult and noisy; nonetheless, I was the one who drove it, so everything worked well for me. It was time for a change, and following an extensive search that included reading articles, testimonials, and recommendations, Michelin Primacy 4 was acquired. The very first thought that sprang to mind was that the pressure of 2.2 had just left the tire shop and had already pinned it! Because the rubber is pliable, I had the impression that the vehicle had changed. In terms of noise, the tires are quiet, the Shumka on Side left much to be desired, and it all depends on the asphalt surface; however, this model is significantly less noisy than the one it replaces. Up next, we have the ability to manage. (In most situations, I am a calm driver; but, there have been occasions on decent roads where I have been Hankook 200+ (now I recall why.? But it handled really well, the car pressed to the ground and scoured a little bit; I had to taxi it. On the track, I experienced an extremely upbeat and encouraging moment. There is a highway that connects the city and the suburbs, and the left lanes on both sides of the road have fallen into a rut. Once you're stuck in the rut, it's quite difficult to get out of it, so you have to accelerate quickly when you finally do. On Michelin you don't feel the track, that is, you cross it from left to right and back, and this does not affect control, no effort and strain, you just move over the bumps and that's it, I guess that because of the bead and the softness of the rubber, it clings to the edges of the rut and therefore you don't feel the transition, of course you feel a deeper rut, but the car steers much more pleasurably. Obviously not the "sea," the car continues to drive in a straight line with grace, and there is no sensation of losing control that can be perceived. TOTAL. Hankook has been in business for 6 years, and Michelin is in its 2nd year. If I had known there was such a distinction between the two, I would have switched to Michelin a long time ago. My question is directed toward KIA: why do you offer your vehicles with such tires? Michelin was a perfect fit for me, but the most essential question is obviously whether or not it is worth 4,700 dollars for a tire. and is it possible to obtain anything that is of higher quality? I do not regret!

Pros

I do not have any regrets about making the purchase; the experience of driving is very different now, and I find that I enjoy it much more. Rulitsya rolls smoothly and silently. This point needs to be made perfectly clear: I base my comparison on the Hankook Ventus Prime2 on the Kia Ceed 2022. , because while I was selecting, I read a lot of reviews, and sometimes people describe their experiences in a way that makes it hard to understand reality. For example, someone might describe the feelings and compare them to something like an Audi or a Nokia, but these things are, of course, very different.

Cons

Price. It was incredibly difficult to part ways with approximately 19,000 people:. Perhaps the level of quality and should justify such a high price:). Rubber THAT WAS MADE IN RUSSIA (and the search for the originals was fruitless; I was unable to locate another maker elsewhere). And I also noted that the car began to coast worse (totally stops earlier than on the oak Hankook, it travels a shorter "coasting" distance, obviously owing to the fact that soft rubber, I don't know if this impacts fuel efficiency (in principle it should), but as a fact saw this. Moreover, I noticed that this.