Review on Binoculars Nikon Aculon A211 16x50 black by Celina Szychowiak ᠌

Satisfied. For this sum in particular - it was held for a very long time at a price of 5500 Pros - below: Clarity of the images. Chrome aberrations are negligible at the sharpness sweet spot. Excellent FOV at 16x magnification. Jitter in the image is acceptable at 16kr. (For those who don't know - even at the same magnification, different kinds of binoculars can have drastically varied degrees of jitter due to subtleties in their optical construction). Comfortable to hold. Very luminous image for one with so narrow an aperture. Includes a high-quality belt. The photo lacks depth, therefore the pillow is invisible. The picture's edge sharpness is admirable, and I've only seen it matched for less money at Olympus (by a factor of 10 or 12 kr). Yet the sound coming out of a Nikon is superb. Inquire about it. Then you remove it from the eyes, and the pain that would have been felt in the brain's visual cortex for those few seconds never materializes. The eyeballs also don't toughen up when they hurt. Negative aspects: Regular large eyepieces did not work with his well-defined brow ridges and strong manly bridge of the nose. To access the six screws, I first had to remove the rubber bands. Bare pipes of a suitable diameter made it feasible to attach them nearer the eyes, revealing the entire visual field. When intercepting, the right diopter ring is too flimsy and causes a loss of touch. Thus, I added a ring approximately 2 cm high, cut from a bicycle chamber, to the top of the right pipe, and it improved. - No longer do I inadvertently knock down the adjustment; rather, I advise