Review on High-Performance Sigma 30mm F1.4 Art Lens 📷 for Canon: A Must-Have for Precision and Creative Photography by Hwang Jiya ᠌

Looking to replace the kit lens on your crop camera? Take it, you won't regret it. By the way, it feels great on FF, the vignette fits perfectly into the choice of a club photographer (wider than 35 mm, this is mega important for a club, especially on these focal lengths, the price is they are paid little, the dimensions are convenience) Pros: In order of importance: 1. Aperture. Know comment. 2. Detailing. Not inferior to 35ke on FF. 2. Contrast and color. Not inferior to 35ke on FF. I compared it somehow with 17-85, yes it's rubbish, but the color and contrast are heaven and earth. 3. Design and Reliability. Monolith! Hello Zeiss. Brutal projectile made of metal and glass. I worked a lot with Elks (fixes) - not that. I fell, I saw how people fell, rather the asphalt would crack. The same Canon 50 1,4 and 10 shares would not have survived this strong man. 4. Focus. Conditionally universal on crop - for shooting people, although ideal. All the same, ideal versatility is 35 real mm (here 50 EGF). Different cons: 1. Chromatic aberrations. Not strong. On holes 1.4-2.8 (they shrink as they are clamped, but not completely). Yes, they are corrected in the editor, but the same Sigma 35 1,4 has practically none. True, the price is higher. 2. Autofocus. If it completely smears - a copy, give it for adjustment. In total, AF is worse than Elek's relatives, by an order of magnitude. This is the strongest drawback of the lens, not essential for the amateur and a compromise for the pros. 3. Infinity on the focus scale, more precisely, the mark does not coincide with that in real life . how it was possible, it doesn’t fit in my head.