Before that, the 188 model was used for several years. There were no complaints. Yes, the corners were not washed, but the overall quality of the wash was a solid 5. Here it turned out that the sprayer is pure marketing, and even the quality of washing was very disappointing. An incomprehensible algorithm, when, especially, it hits the window below, so when the lower part of the frame is touched, it squeaks and can drive down twice, or maybe stop once. Leaving the corners even more unwashed. Verdict. Who wants to automate the washing process, then take the 188 model better. Yes, it is taller in dimensions, but the quality of washing is better. I'm attaching a photo of the studs. In the photo with an unwashed corner, strong dirt is visible - this is after several years of washing with a 188 model. And the unwashed part, which is from the 388 model. Compare the difference. I am also attaching a photo with an unwashed edge of the window. More disappointed with the purchase.
Xiaomi Mi Robot Vacuum-Mop Essential Robot Vacuum Cleaner, white
284 Review
Xiaomi Mi Robot Vacuum-Mop 2 Lite RU robot vacuum cleaner, white
198 Review
iRobot Roomba 692: Smart Robot Vacuum with Wi-Fi, 🤖 Alexa Compatibility, and Pet-Friendly Features for Effortless Cleaning on Any Surface
138 Review
Xiaomi Mi Robot Vacuum Cleaner 1S Global Robot Vacuum Cleaner, white
389 Review