Pros
- Performance.
Cons
- Didn't find it.
Pros
- The increased performance of the R7 3700X is present, but I did not feel any noticeable acceleration relative to the R5 2600 in everyday use. The performance of the multi-threaded load during video conversion pleased, but it's understandable - both the greater number of cores and the performance are higher. I took it for 23300r - not a very big difference with the R5 3600X, but relative to the R5 3600 the difference is very big. Why do I believe that 3600 is a new "top"!
Cons
- 1) Despite a thermal package of 65W for "atypical" tasks like video transcoding with all cores or Cinebench rendering, the real power goes beyond 90W and the CPU heats up wildly to 76-78C degrees, while the frequency drops to 3.9-4 GHz. In workloads, the temperature easily exceeds 60C, which has to be compensated by coolers - and this is extra noise. 2) A hot "explosive" stone - it heats up quickly and then lowers the frequencies, which causes the fans to spin up at any short-term load, so at first I tried to solve it by setting the PWM fan profile. Then, on the advice of the gamersnexus portal, an OFFSET was made for the processor voltage -0.075 v. This allowed, without removing overclocking to 4.4, to work stably at temperatures up to 60C in games and work tasks. Or set the BIOS to 4.1 GHz with a voltage of 12022 v - but then stress tests do not pass and video conversion, you need to reduce the multiplier to 4.0 GHz or 3.9 GHz for these tasks, increasing the voltage leads to heating for 75C. 3) I took the OEM version. From the store, the legs were jammed at the edge in a blister - he came the next day, apparently the store specialists corrected the handles. Look carefully at the rows upon receipt, bent legs are easy to break off when editing on your own - then you will not return such a stone to the store!
Pros
- I took the processor to work with 3D graphics, it copes with the tasks set with a bang.
Cons
- not found for my tasks
Pros
- Sane, relative to Intel (at the time of purchase) price. Performance. Pretty cold.
Cons
- Peculiar work of auto boost and temperature jumps.
Pros
- Performance, low TDP, reasonable price, ability to work on older boards
Cons
- Strange auto-overclocking algorithms, like all Ryzen
Pros
- It's perfect for the money
Cons
- Didn't find
Pros
- Performance
Pros
- Multi-core.
Cons
- Temperature and incomprehensible algorithm of operation in idle
Pros
- You don’t need top cooling, you don’t have to think about overclocking, good at rendering, good at streaming (very)
Cons
- Overclocking does not give a special increase, RAM only works fine up to 3800 MHz, the standard voltage for the processor is inadequate for me
Pros
- It works normally at standard frequencies, the regular boxed cooler copes with its duties quite well, it did not rise above 75-80 (under load on all cores). 8 cores, 16 threads, frequency fluctuates
Cons
- Not yet
Pros
- Many cores/threads Increased single core speed Cache size and speed Support for legacy motherboards (AM4) Price lower than Intel Improved work with memory and its overclocking
Cons
- Price, it is better to wait until the hype subsides. Unlocked multiplier, but there is no point in overclocking. AMD squeezed everything out of it.
Pros
- Excellent performance per watt/ruble Set up almost perfectly out of the box Medium hot (as an advantage)
Cons
- Current price Almost complete pointlessness of overclocking Small spread of parameters from instance to instance Medium hot (as disadvantage) Maximum frequencies are almost never reached There are memory requirements
Pros
- Can provide ultra-fast performance of 100+ fps in the world's most popular games
Cons
- Functionality
Pros
- 4 Max 4GHz Boost unlocked for overclocking 36MB DDR4 game cache 3200MHz system memory spec
Cons
- Something else
Pros
- 8 cores and 16 threads bundled with AMD Wraith Prism cooler with color adjustable LED support
Cons
- Fade Out
