Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 73
  • 5
    44
  • 4
    16
  • 3
    5
  • 2
    5
  • 1
    3

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Fits the description completely, very satisfying.

Bought a new car and gave tires in the cabin. The previous one was traded in and left in 2 hours on a new one. The old car had hakka 8. I noticed the difference right away. I was extremely surprised the difference was in favor of Goodrich. Especially if the snow porridge on the ice. At the end of March, I left Hong Kong for Hong Kong along the track with ankle-deep snow. By the end of the journey, rain and from +2 to +9. Dry in places. At +5 on dry it gave 200. It was amazing on the track

Pros
  • Rowing in the snow. Holds ice. Excellent handling. Holds well on asphalt. Predictable at speeds up to 200 km / h. Didn't go faster.
Cons
  • No

Revainrating 4 out of 5

It is of good quality, but I won't buy it again.

I took 2 sets for myself and a relative, size 175x65 R14. (I also wanted to take my father-in-law, but R13 was not available). Good tires, 3rd winter in the Urals (city, highway, countryside operation at temperatures from +10 to -45). My mileage is more than 40,000, the spikes are all in place, wear is practically invisible (the presence (absence) of spikes and wear depends on the carrier). The tire behaves confidently. The relative is also happy.

Pros
  • Price, brand, design.
Cons
  • braking on packed snow

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I didn³'t expect the quality to be this good.

Rides the first season. I put my wife on a Citroen C3 Picasso, instead of Nordman-4 rolled for 5 years. While my car is in service, I rode a woman's Citroen. Tires 185/65 R15, bought something around 2800 for a wheel. Rubber budget, but unexpectedly worthy option. Rushing through the snow and ice - everything is on the level. MUCH quieter than the Nordman-4 that stood before. Just much quieter. There is no that wild howl, as it was on the old rubber.

Pros
  • Quiet. Keep the road. Kolya is not afraid. Price tag.
Cons
  • Have not found.

I left for two seasons on a Kia Rio 15 radius, the tires proved to be excellent ! I chose not expensive but good, I also read reviews here and turned out to be true, so I decided to write to help just like me. In the first season I went quietly, no complaints, that's all the spikes are in place, in the second season he gestured. I was confident in the spikes, in general, with hard (sideways, handbrake, slip) operation, about 30% of the spikes were lost. I recommend ! By the way, I didn’t feel a

Pros
  • Low price - excellent quality
Cons
  • No!

Purchased in dimension 215/60 R16 on Citroen DS4. Balanced well, no more than 40 grams per wheel. After the break-in, I re-balanced, the weight decreased to 25-30 grams. The spikes do not make noise, the feeling is like Velcro. Taxiing without enthusiasm, good on dry pavement. 11/28/2022 had the opportunity to try it on the ice in MSC and MO. Braking is predictable, abs almost does not work. Acceleration from standstill is also very confident without slipping (well, almost). I bought a set for…

Pros
  • 1. No noise; 2. good handling; 3. well balanced; 4. Price.
Cons
  • Haven't found it yet. rubber like rubber

Operated on Renault Sandero Stepway. After the cheap summer tires installed from the factory, as soon as I changed my shoes, I felt the difference - the noise suddenly disappeared, the car gently moves off, some more softness was added to the already good energy intensity of the Sandero suspension. I used it for two seasons, and although I don’t drive often in winter and mostly around the city, about 3000 km / season, all the spikes are in place. When the ABS is activated on ice, it clings well

Pros
  • Quiet, grippy on ice, good value for money
Cons
  • Haven't revealed yet

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I was surprised by the quality for this price.

Operating experience - 1 winter. I went everywhere I wanted to go. He went everywhere he wanted to go. Spikes lost in 1 season, provided that for a long time I drove at a positive temperature on bare asphalt - not a single one was lost. At high positive temperatures it becomes very soft - strange sensations when driving. But nevertheless, it slows down, turns, no spikes are lost, wear is minimal.

Pros
  • Perfect tire for your money
Cons
  • "Floats" at a temperature of +10 and above

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Not a good product, sorry to have spent money on it.

A gift from the dealer for Vesta Cross. Size 205/50/17. Region Hong Kong region. The first season seemed to be nothing, probably because I ran the car. From February to May, 4000 km passed the norms. I drove the rear wheel over the side stone - I got a side hole, it can not be repaired, it was replaced by a hull. The second season at first hoped that the norms would be, but nifiga. A little snow falls and Khan, there is no braking at all, the ABS chirps from the beginning of braking to the…

Pros
  • Quiet as summer. Ice seems to hold. The snow roll also seems to be holding. Acceptable on dry pavement.
Cons
  • It doesn’t ride on snowy porridge, it slips like summer, it goes into a skid, in a snowfall it’s generally a fierce atas ! The track is terrible for her. There is no acceleration in snow and slush.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

One of the best offers, glad I bought it.

Due to the lack of money before the 12-13 season, I borrowed and took this rubber for a new car (Kia ceed JD, automatic transmission) I was preparing for the worst, because I was already used to good tires both on workhorses (management loves Nokian) and personal (there were a lot of different rubbers: Velcro and spikes - I love Michelin myself - in addition to other equal advantages with socks - I think the properties of Michelin are the characteristics last longer). I was pleasantly…

Pros
  • Great tire for your money. 1) It goes well on loose snow, when driving wisely - everywhere you can safely drive / drive. 2) For 2 seasons (Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug, about 16000 km, 1 percent of the spikes are lost - I overboard in the summer, only at +4 and above the average daily temperature). 3) Produced by the Michelin division. 4) Resistant to damage (2 comrades from work have already thrown out on the eminent wheel this spring - the route and traffic are the same)
Cons
  • 1) I would like more grip on packed snow and ice (but this, as practice shows, for other money), but it feels like the rating is above average. 2) Harsh after -25 and below, but not deadly oak, they warm up on the trip

Revainrating 2 out of 5

I didn't like it, I don't recommend buying it.

I put it on the second focus after the summer Michelin. feeling that moved to the tractor. You can feel every stone on the road. Any bump is given a blow to the suspension. When you drive slowly, you feel the lamellas both in the steering wheel and in your spine! Last year I rode an amtel with a rusk like that of an ekogama - I was happy as an elephant, but, unfortunately, after the third season a hernia on the tread came out - I had to change it to this one. I do not categorically recommend it

Pros
  • Better than nothing
Cons
  • Rigid, noisy

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Best I have ever used, great product for anyone!

Dimension 215/65, radius 16, bought in the summer of 2022 for 3000 per tire. Made in 2022 at the Michelin factory. Balanced very well, a pair of tires did not require weights at all, although the disks have already passed 6 winter seasons. When I just put in a new one, after summer tires it seemed that it was making a lot of noise. After 500 km, the noise decreased and it began to make a very moderate noise for winter spikes, and then it became completely inaudible. Consumption really became…

Pros
  • quiet for spikes. moderately soft. consumption is lower than on summer tires.
Cons
  • Not found in two seasons

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Don't buy it, it's not what it should be.

I use these tires on Renault Duster with all-wheel drive. There is an experience of using Kumho K19 / Chevrolet Niva. So here's the BFG G-Force starts well, slows down badly on fresh snow. Just some seams. A couple of times I almost came to the bumper, now I keep a lot further. Ice holds up well. I will not take because it is unpredictable. Maybe it depends on the ABS. It works very early in the snow, the rubber does not hold. The course is stable, I did not notice any demolitions. BUT, I DO…

Pros
  • Soft, beautiful. Relatively not expensive. Well, branded .))
Cons
  • Poor braking on rough snow!

Very good cross-country ability in a deep soft snowdrift, they do not make noise, it goes well and smoothly without yaw on the track. It just so happened that this winter I rode the Camry 70 for half the winter on Nokia Haka 9 and the second half of the winter I ride these goodrichs, so the difference is almost imperceptible, but in terms of cross-country ability it seems to be better 🤔

Pros
  • For the price it's definitely a plus.
Cons
  • Spikes some from the last century, outdated design of spikes

Everything about that rubber ruined the studs. Pros below: Good, not expensive rubber. It rows well in the snow. Since I’m not Schumacher, the handling on this rubber is good for me. Once I got into a hole, I thought there would be a hernia, but nothing happened. Different cons: Of the shortcomings, the spikes in the tire do not hold well. The front lost almost 70% of the spikes. The rear axle spikes are all in place. And this despite the fact that I don’t drive. , there were only 5 spikes lost

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I like everything, the price and quality are acceptable.

I bought tires in 2022 for a Citroen C4. Rode 3 seasons. Moderately noisy, goes well on loose snow, does not tan even in severe frost. For the first season, the loss of spikes is approximately 5 pcs. from the wheel, the second is about 30%, the third is almost everything. But in defense I will say that she did not go worse. Even without spikes, at the end of winter, I felt confident on it.

Pros
  • Price, type
Cons
  • Rapid loss of spikes

Put on Renault Logan. On the snowy track felt pretty confident. Previously, I used Nordman4, Gislaved NF5, but there was no such confidence with this rubber. I drove through a swept field, almost did not skid. On another rubber would have to dig out the car. On ice, you need to get used to the behavior of the car. I will add to other reviews that it was balanced without problems, the arrows are drawn in the right direction

Pros
  • Confident driving on snow
Cons
  • Makes a little noise, leads away a little on the ice

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product is really good, I'm glad I purchased it.

Auto Lada Granta, 185/60Q r15 XL, I recommend, in '16 the price is 3tr per balloon. Pros below: Review after 2 winters. 16-17 Quiet, you can hear the thorns from neighboring cars. On clean asphalt, it slows down perfectly, accelerates to 140, holds the road, is not afraid of ruts, I recommend it. Rows well in deep snow. With its cons: Uncertainly overcomes the snow crossings (rolls) between the rows, the only thing that annoys. Mediocre starts on packed snow in the city. Loss of spikes for the

Revainrating 5 out of 5

An ideal product for any type of consumer.

Skated on 195/65/r15 season 2022-2022 in St. Petersburg. A lot of snow. Ice, etc. No problem. Lost only 2 spikes. Rubber behaves very predictably. Surely slows down. Quiet. Behaviorally, it is similar to studless. The spikes are only audible under active braking. Rutting - endures. Strong enough. Virgin lands are rowed even in abundance. During the whole winter, I took out a shovel once, when I fell off the icy rut in gardening. Of all the other snowdrifts went himself. The only thing that is…

Pros
  • Great tires for your money. sustainable. Managed. Quiet. Rows well. Perfectly balanced.
Cons
  • Dislikes deep puddles. Does not feel confident in deep fresh snow on the road. Does not like high speed in corners.