Pros
- Made in the 2022, but this is a Michelin production, which is already good for its price. One of the most affordable and acceptable rubbers on the market
Cons
- Time will show
BFGoodrich g-Force Stud 215/60 R16 99Q winter Review
73
·
Very good
Rating
4.3
Industrial and Scientific, 🚰 Hydraulics, Pneumatics & Plumbing, 🚜 Hydraulic Equipment, 🚰 Hydraulics, Pneumatics & Plumbing
Media
(10)
Photos by authors
(6)
Description of BFGoodrich g-Force Stud 215/60 R16 99Q winter
332077215/60R16 99Q XL G-Force Stud TL (studded) Winter model of BFGoodrich G-Force Stud studded tires for passenger cars. The main task pursued by technologists when designing the G-Force Stud model was to meet the needs of motorists in the northern regions. The holistic approach to the BFGoodrich G-Force Stud studded tire ensures excellent performance on any type of winter road. The BFGoodrich G-Force Stud''s unique directional tread design with optimized block layout and eight-row studding system delivers superior traction on the toughest road surfaces, whether snow or ice. Thanks to the wide...
Pros
- There are no complaints at all about the driving performance, the price tag, or the fact that all the spikes are still in place after two winters. On bare pavement + 5 + 10, on snow, on porridge, outside the city on highways, and on bare land, they act as one would expect.
Cons
- You can consider the noise to be a defect, but any spike damages the asphalt and creates noise.
Pros
- Fast clearance of goods, even with the hype. Prices are lower than other stores.
Cons
- No
Pros
- Soft and comfortable, without noise. runs well in a lot of snow. When overtaking, you can confidently move through a rut and a snow parapet. decent brakes. resistant to wear.
Cons
- On ice, acceleration from a stop is not very impressive, but this is not a problem.
Pros
- Calm with a good flow of traffic.
Cons
- Not in equilibrium! It can swim at speeds of more than 110 miles per hour and behaves repulsively when it is on ice.
Pros
- Excellent price, excellent grip properties—both on loose snow and on rolled snow—when driving on asphalt, good handling, very quiet, and fuel consumption that doesn't feel higher than with summer tires. The placement of the spikes on the shoulders of the tread also makes these tires work well with non-studded tires.
Cons
- I don't perceive any flaws in the rubber for the money I paid; it fully functions and is a good value.
Pros
- spikes and winter tires. All.
Cons
- There isn't any controllability. The unpredictability of the lateral slide is the darkest aspect. Everything is bad when driving on ice, on snow that is compacted, or in a rut. does not maintain the road. The act of passing is done with a faint "2022 Avos" feeling. With a slight plus, it staggers and is beneficial in porridge. When leaving the yard in dense snow, it moves normally, but any rubber with a winter sipe does the same thing. It brakes normally, the deceleration is bearable and predictable on all types of winter roads, it is "sched" into your brain's memory, and you are aware of your alternatives for braking performance. Lateral demolition, however, IS SOMETHING. It holds and then quickly breaks into demolition at a specific point in a smooth arc or turn. Side slide is so simple, like if summertime had suddenly arrived. My breeches always "pull", you can tell they didn't skimp on the rubber, you always know their possibilities, and most importantly, you can feel them. It is always predictable when they will be destroyed, and you have influence over when it will happen. A sudden collapse in uncontrolled destruction follows. comparable to "poznyak men, here I p. Very dissatisfied. Trails do not require tires. In rural areas, a speed of 40 to 60 mph is sufficient, but not for efficient travel on long distances.
Pros
- Doesn't make noise. Keeps the track. Doesn't roar. Brakes on everywhere (on ice, on snow, on asphalt). Driven on ice and snow.
Cons
- It costs 1000 more than the most budget brands (as of autumn 2022).
Pros
- Quiet, excellent road holding, smooth ride
Cons
- for 5k was not found
Pros
- Rides great in snowdrifts
Cons
- Until I discovered
Pros
- Excellent performance in all respects
Cons
- All the same, losing to the "luxury" Nokian and Continental
Pros
- Inexpensive and not cheap. More expensive than snowmax, but cheaper than X-ice or Hakkapellit. Such a golden mean. Nice directional tread pattern. But it's all poetry. Now the facts. Moderately quiet, spikes rattle on asphalt, of course, but in general it is comparable to the summer regular Kalinovskaya Kama-Euro. This is nothing but a cheaper Michelin. Like a firm, and at the same time - inexpensive. In general, Michelin tires, instead of records for braking distances and other special disciplines from magazines, have more pragmatic advantages, such as quietness or economy. The manufacturer claims reinforced spike sockets. Bottom line: in three seasons, I didn’t lose a single one, although it used to skid at intersections and during acceleration. Were a little off, yes. But losses . maybe single spikes from strength. Excellent, tenacious braking on dry and wet pavement. Handling with patency . normal. Nothing special catches your eye, you just drive and that's it.
Cons
- Let's just say, it's not very comfortable to slow down on ice with ABS. However, polished ice is not the same as asphalt. In general, this is probably average. But the situation is ambiguous. A tire with average braking properties on pavement and excellent on ice would be more balanced. On the other hand, if we remember that we drive on asphalt in winter 90% of the time . then the optimal choice may be the opposite. A modest speed index Q - 160 km / h - a "flaw" rather far-fetched, a reasonable driver is unlikely to run more than 140 on a winter road.
Pros
- reasonable price
Cons
- whistling as if the window is constantly ajar, you definitely can’t call it quiet
