Bridgestone Alenza 001 235/55 R19 101 year old Review

The word "disappointed" doesn't quite fit. I skipped on AT-shek on purpose for a long time, picked a more expensive road because I was planning a summer trip (mainly on trails), and now I have no idea how to enjoy myself while riding this wooden howling horror with my family.

The tires in the recall picture have a one-season mileage of 22,000 kilometers. The worst wear resistance signs have not yet been noticed by me. already ten times pierced in total. Sidewalls are incredibly weak in comparison to others. The armature is caught.

great driving experience and handling on wet and dry roads. Super quiet and smooth ride. I replaced them with Continental and the car immediately became like new without loss of performance and funds) I would recommend!

Excellent tires. Not cheap of course, but worth the money. I took the SUV version for a crossover instead of stock. There is a difference.

Foaming at the mouth, the manager argued that the Hong Kong Bridgestone alenza 001 225/55 r18 is the same as from Japan. 15,000 runs - a constant rumble on the pavement, and only because of this is a huge MINUS.

Took 295/45/r20 on a Jeep SRT. The profile is wide. Used to be Michelin, strongly thrown from side to side in a rut. Bridgestone handles the rut better. The car drives confidently after the collapse. I like. Thank you.

I regret buying a bit, extremely noisy. The handle and durability of it are definitely above average, but it makes a lot of noise, and I'm hoping that won't be a problem. I'll add a bit more later on, and I could even adjust the rating. Pros: We switched to fresh ones, and our current mileage stands at 100 kilometers. track speed from eighty to one hundred thirty: I found the handling to be really enjoyable, whether it was on dry or wet roads, hydroplaning in puddles, or popping up. not deep…

What can I say, chose R18 on the XC60. On J. Market, almost every rubber in this price range had both positive and a bunch of negative reviews (for wear, for rutting, for aquaplaning). I searched for it and eventually spat, I decided to take the one that is newer, comparable in price and characteristics, but for which there are no reviews at all (roughly speaking blindly). So far, I don’t regret it for a month and a half, the most important plus is that in the rain, which is not uncommon here…

The quality of handling - just shine. But in terms of sound, the tires should be renamed Bridgestone Gundezh. Even at low speeds they give a low rumble, which subsides at 80 km / h, and then rises again - already expected. The intensity of the sound is also highly dependent on the characteristics of the road surface. On newly laid asphalt they go almost silently, on old, stony and with a lot of cracks they make indecent noise. Perhaps the weight of the car still affects, but there is nothing to

I bought tires in 2022, drove 55,000-60,000 km on it, from the Black Sea to the White Sea, from Hong Kong to the Urals. everyone saw - a flat road, serpentine, stones, for the first run of 50 thousand. not a single puncture, then they began to go bald and for the last 5-10 thousand grabbed 2 punctures at once and the rubber began to float in heavy rain after 80 - before that it was more than 100 and everything is fine. I must say right away that the driving style is aggressive, I like to play…

No disappointment, no joy. Tires are like tires. They don't annoy, they don't excite. Handling in a rut is normal, predictable, but not so much that you don’t notice it at all. Haven't had a chance to test it in rain yet. But I think it will also be just "ok".

And so I take the summer Bridge. still considered TOyo. as an option. Europe is good. But on our roads, hernias and cuts are their strong point. Strictly personal opinion. (I compare with Nokia and Continental, which I had to travel too). Different pros: Solid, strong, high-speed tire, holds the road well. both on dry and wet pavement, in the mud, of course, no. It’s not for this, the sidewalls are strong, though I caught one screw already, With its cons: What did not like. traveled 10,000 km…

The first set (Made in 2022) was on a Kia Sportage 3 AWD - the tires showed themselves just fine, skated for two seasons and sold the car! The second set (Made in Japan) is on a Hyundai ix55 3.0 CRDI AWD - also not bad, but the behavior is different, enough for three seasons (the car is much heavier and faster) - I would like more, but alas! Driving style - aggressive! Noisy and harsh, but the handling is just on top!

Very quiet and strong tires. in Altai, I drove along rocky roads, drove 200 kilometers along them. there were sharp ledges everywhere and gravel on the passes, I thought they wouldn’t survive. But no, the tires didn’t fail. I am very satisfied. It is not in vain that this tire model is installed on new premium SUVs such as BMW X 5, etc. I recommend to buy, I will only take the Bridge for myself, not advertising, but my personal experience of using tires of this brand and the indicated models.

I took 235/50 R18 tires on my Hyundai ix35 (the factory size was not in stock), to be honest, I expected that there would be excessive rigidity, but in reality my fears were not confirmed. Pleasant softness (for profile 50) combined with excellent handling leave a pleasant driving experience. On a wet track, the asymmetric tread pattern copes quite quickly with the removal of water, so that water obstacles are overcome effortlessly. When driving on the dirt road and bumps, the tires absorb…

I drove a Dueler H/P Sport for a long time. From the very first release. True, I was always looking for Japanese ones. This year I couldn’t, they offered either Malaysian or Thai. Decided to try Alenza. Something the Japanese did not understand. Although in fact everything seems to be fine. Maybe I can't get the right pressure. In general, rubber is not for ordinary cars (in the sense not for one and a half to two liter balalaikas). Tires are designed for heavy vehicles. I tried to drive a…

With an aggressive (or near) manner (effective acceleration and braking) - it lives no more than 3 seasons (already in the middle of the 3rd - axle boxes appear). Rubber is not soft - but it provides predictable behavior of the car (there is no buildup the same) Now its purchase is not so unambiguous (previously, rubber cost about 7k per balloon - now for 11 .) On Tiguan 1 rest - it is ideal in general)

Generally satisfied. I bought in 2022, now the price is 2 times higher. Michelin may be better, but obviously less will last and be erased. Bridgestone lasts for a long time, the previous wheels of the year were enough for 4, despite the fact that Auto has 35-40 thousand mileage per year Its pros: Wear-resistant, good road holding. There is homologatsich from BMW. Cons: If the temperature is below +10 degrees, the rubber becomes oak.

The first rubber from the 2022 that I put on a foreign car. Delivered recently, it is balanced without questions. There is no noise, the handling is normal. As for x3, I have 2 x3 cars of different years, so what they write that jumps out of the rut is not from the brand of rubber, but from the size 225 60 p17 it behaves well, it doesn’t jump out where the Pirelli runflat or the RF bridge. The other car is 245 55 p18 made in germanium, and this car is constantly trying to jump out of the rut. A

I bought it for MB GLK 300 instead of the standard conti 4x4 sontact V 99 235/50 R19. Of course, it is not very objective to compare a heavily worn tire with a new one, albeit from different brands. In general, the impressions are good. Sufficiently rigid sidewall, there is disc protection, which is very useful. Conti didn't have that option. The car became more rigid, assembled, the steering wheel began to spin easier. Stopped paying attention to the track. Absolutely freely controlled, does…