- Advantages: 1 Usability 2 User-friendly interface 3 A multitude of modes suited for novices 4 Planning and building the structure (comfortable to hold) 5 Very effective batteries (up to 1500 photos) 6 capabilities of wireless syncing 7 swivel screen 8 weight
- Hence, I did not pick up on it!
- - minimal noise at high ISO (it's definitely possible to shoot at 6400), swivel screen, and good image quality - 16:9 (but only in Live View) (but only in Live View) 18MP is quite fantastic, you can photograph in JPEG, in-camera processing is perfect for me, the whale lens is fairly clear, the case is a wonderful size that's neither too small nor too huge, and it's tenacious in your hands. Yet, I desire a wider working aperture. Consider selecting option 18-135 immediately.
- - Only available in 16:9 on Live View (I would like it through the viewfinder) despite having a folding screen, Sony's design is more practical when nothing needs to be turned or turned out. - Slow focus in Live View. - There is no autofocus in the video (although focusing manually does add some charm), and the video occasionally stops recording automatically even after a few seconds (then it is written for a long time without problems). Possibly a higher class is required because the SD speed is so low. - The size of all DSLRs is a drawback. Put it nowhere near your pocket. Nevertheless, there are currently no alternative choices. The products sold as "mirrorless" cannot be compared to this one in terms of quality. Even then, I'm not sure, but Testil, Olimus Pen, and Sony Nex are possible rivals to the original Canon 1100. - While using the viewfinder, the screen does not shut off immediately (no sensor). I'm not sure why they did it, but perhaps it affects reliability in some way. It's not a good idea to constantly turn the screen on and off. not a hindrance to job.
- Batteries and the lens cap are minor details.
- - simplicity of use - all buttons are present - comparatively light weight - screen - beginner's tips - battery life
- the autofocus
- Matrix, as in Canon's pricier cameras and lenses, at a discount. As a starter DSLR, it's one of the top picks. Mirrorless cameras like the Canon EOS M, Samsung NX, etc., cannot compete with DSLRs in terms of image quality. The device will save you money that may then be put on lenses, which are far more crucial than the carcass itself.
- The edges of the 18-55 whale lens are particularly soapy. It turned out to be a good 18-55 IS STM glass, very clear (see the photAmazon dot de site, there is a mtf table). If you invest in a 50mm f/1.8 for your 18-55 IS STM, you'll be able to take stunning photos in about every category, apart from macro and telephoto work. Get inspiration on the website 35 picture dot ru, where masterpieces are captured with a whale (study photography, adjust your camera's settings, and shoot in RAW + Lightroom or Photoshop). Because to its stabilizer, the 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 Sigma lens is also an excellent choice for shooting video, but if you want to take your videography to the next level, you should switch to manual focus mode and use a program like Magic Lantern to do so. Starting with 650d, 60d, and 100d, STM is supported in devices.
- 1. Screening rotor 1. Anyone who has ever shot in this manner will understand what I mean when I say that this is a thing, and that it now allows you to shoot from the most uncomfortable postures. 2. The menu is very easy to read. 3. Quite condensed as well as lightweight (my wife said that it was too heavy for her). 4. It performs exceptionally well when paired with an 18-200 EF-S lens. 5. It's the best camera for traveling, hands down. 6. The camera comes with in-built photo editing software, but I didn't use it because I'd rather take high-quality pictures right away than fiddle around in Photoshop later. 6. The ability to shoot at night is outstanding. 7. Outstanding color reproduction and clarity of image. 8. Full HD video.
- 1. When using the Life View mode (from the screen), the autofocus is disabled, which results in occasional focus issues. 2. Do not under any circumstances use with an 18-55 whale lens; the whale is designed to discourage any desire to take photographs. 3. The cost is twenty thousand dollars, which is just right for him (took for 25) 4. Use is not permitted with hands that are crooked:)))
- Although though only more expensive lenses can completely expose the camera's capabilities, the included kit lens is practical in that it is lightweight, compact, and has a swivel display. Viewfinder with good clarity and brightness, rapid autofocus, and an automatic option that actually works! Menus that are easy to use, as well as shooting modes that are fun to use. Adequate price-quality ratio!
- It is necessary to have a good flash if you want to take images of a high quality; the one that comes with the camera is not up to the task, despite the fact that it functions effectively. A tripod for taking pictures in the evening and of the night sky, of course, as well as a remote control and a battery pack for a more comfortable hold in the hand and a larger amount of charge; all of this, however, is not strictly necessary if the outcome of the photograph is not something that is important to you.
- reasonably light. A Kalashnikov assault rifle is straightforward and dependable. good pictures, but not enough sharpness. rapid, precise focus. Basically, a beginner's reportage camera.
- The colors do not accurately express since there is not a wide enough color spectrum. As you check the photographs on your computer, the display embellishes, everything seems to be gut, and occasionally, you want to beat him.
- It is convenient to lie in your hand, has a menu that is easy to comprehend, and plays videos normally. Those who complain about the lack of autofocus may consider purchasing a video camera instead. After reading some terrible complaints about the whale 18-55 lens, I decided to purchase it with with an 18-135 lens instead. I don't have any second thoughts about purchasing it because it includes a manual focus and a stabilizer. Excellent. The most important thing to keep in mind is that it is not the camera but the photographer who takes the pictures. The Canon 600d gives you the ability to snap photographs of a very high quality. A guide that is quite informative.
- In spite of this, Akum has room for improvement.
- Comparatively little weight, the same 7D with the same matrix, and other DSLRs; Construction quality, with no creaking to be heard anywhere and nothing coming loose; Screen that may be viewed from any angle because to its swivel design; The ergonomics are nearly excellent; you can operate it with one hand, with the exception of the buttons for the menu and the information, but all of the other buttons are at an accessible location; There is no point in overestimating it unnecessarily, because the detail is gradually decreasing further, some will probably want to argue, and they will say that 3200 iso is working, but this is already in your opinion, and if it suits you, then it's good; the working number of ISO is 1600. If it suits you, then it's good; if it doesn't suit you, then it's not good. It functions quite well with Chinese third-party puffs, but you should check the compatibility as soon as possible in the shop; capturing high-definition video; The lens that comes with the kit is quite nice, has universal focal lengths, and the manual focus is good; nonetheless, it is easy to find yourself out of focus quickly and by accident.
- While changing lenses, dust will invariably get onto the matrix of the camera, as is the case with all cameras that have removable lenses; nevertheless, I don't notice this problem until I stop shooting at an aperture of 11 or higher. When using LiveView, the autofocus is noticeably slower than on the 700D. In addition, there is one more drawback associated with LiveView: there may be a bug in the software that causes it, but when using live sighting, the metering mode can only be set to "evaluative." If you select any other metering mode (such as Spot, etc.), the change appears to be stored, but it eventually reverts back to "evaluative." In general, LiveView is intended for use with video, while the viewfinder offers superior quality in terms of brightness and autofocus speed.
- Insignificantly remarkable
- relic of the past
- Price, build quality, and sensor maintenance in 2022
- Not
- The camera's instructions devote an entire tolmouth to praising the 600D, and any amateur or professional photographer will agree that it is fantastic. This is a low-cost alternative to a professional-grade DSLR. The option to take a picture while filming, albeit a low-quality one.
- Even if you use an external flash, the built-in one isn't very good. Branded accessories are extremely pricey. For instance, a branded EW-73B hood retails for $2022. Focusing takes a few seconds whenever the image is shown on the LCD. Massive video file sizes. Taking a video is quite challenging.