Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 138
  • 5
    103
  • 4
    27
  • 3
    5
  • 2
    2
  • 1
    1

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I do not cease to rejoice at the purchase, a very good deal!

Great device. The best choice in terms of price / quality ratio. They took it as a universal device for photo / video when traveling. The photoscome out just great! I advise all beginners and amateurs, the quality of the pictures is excellent! For beginners, the 18-55 whale lens is quite enough, in the future it will be possible to buy a better lens. After the purchase, I immediately felt the difference between the pictures with a DSLR and ordinary soap dishes. The video is also of good…

Pros
  • The best choice in terms of price / quality ratio
Cons
  • did not find

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A wonderful product, its nice to use.

I can’tcomrrectly evaluate the camera. this is my first DSLR, but I can say withcomnfidence that anyone who buys this model will definitely get involved in the art of beautiful photography and willcomntinue to develop in this direction! In general, I recommend this model to everyone! The price matches the quality. For those who are interested, here is a link to my photos. It will be nice to read yourcomments and criticism)))

Pros
  • Great look! The build quality is good. It is felt that the thing is professional. There was always enough battery.
Cons
  • Probably the price, but I think over time this model will become obsolete and become cheaper.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I'm amazed! It was definitely worth the money!

My first DSLR, so I can say that I see only pluses in it. For those who decide to go to the level above digital, this is a very good choice. I took it with two whale lenses. Knowing their strengths and weaknesses, plus having carefully studied the instructions, you can learn how to take good pictures. The main thing is to forget about auto mode. All that is needed to achieve the first good results is to understand what shutter speed is, what ISO and aperture are. Once you understand how best to

Pros
  • price, image quality, light weight and much more
Cons
  • sometimes noisy pictures are obtained, but here a lot depends on who is shooting and what settings are set.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Do not hesitate to buy, the quality is amazing for the price.

take it and you won’t regret it at all, it’s worth your money! for the first DSLR, believe me the best. don’t look in the direction of Nikon, they don’t stand next to Kenon 600d. I wascomnvinced of this when choosing a SLR. here are a few photos he took with cheap lenses 18-55 and Temron 70-300, the pictures are ordinary. amateur, it suits me, although the pros will say it and not the photo. I'm an amateur and I recently had a DSLR. I just got carried away and now it won't let go. Good…

Pros
  • - Comfortable grip and on layout - swivel screen - workmanship quality -high-quality photos - the price has dropped on it is a plus) - practically not inferior in the picture to 650d and 60d -bright screen - turns on quickly -clear and convenient menu -management is noticeably better, unlike Nikon - the body is not bad, although it doesn’t inspire confidence like in Nikon, but under it is a monolith, a rigid frame.
Cons
  • -the most basic is a weak battery, but an additional battery and the problem is solved or a battery pack - backlash of the battery in the battery compartment, but this is easily eliminated - lens caps without a lace, but again, this is easily done by yourself - there is no automatic focusing in the video, I didn’t even turn on the video when I bought it, and now I think that this is an unnecessary function in a DSLR, although it shoots an excellent video. I advise beginners not to pay attention to the video when choosing a DSLR . believe it to you not useful . taking pictures is much more interesting.

I bought an 18-200 lens right away, they said it’s more suitable for landscapes, well, it, I need a lot of focus for the scene, and I don’t shoot portraits very well without a flash, my eyes are constantly out of focus, although the pictures are well exposed, I don’t know, maybe I still don't have enough skills, but I don't like something. well, it's the lens, and the camera is excellent

Pros
  • Excellent quality, well, which is typical for a DSLR, a strong flash, in this camera EVERYTHING is built)))
Cons
  • When recording a video, the recording stops after always a different time, and the message "Recording was automatically stopped" pops up. I often speak, and all my performances are recorded by the devil knows how, it's a shame to buy a camera for that kind of money and that it shoots like that.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Excellent quality, absolutely not expected for such a price.

It's just perfect for a beginner (like the 650D and 700D). It has everything a beginner photographer needs. The capabilities of this camera will grow as your skill grows for a very long time tocomme. You will also notice a significant improvement in image quality when moving up to mid-range lenses. The fleet of lenses for the EF-S / EF mount is simply huge, there will be plenty to choose from. Photo examples:

Pros
  • 1. Excellent image quality. APS-C sensor and processor as in older models. 2. Capacious battery, enough for ~ 700 shots without flash. 3. Rotary screen. In some situations (for example, shooting in a crowd with arms outstretched or very close to the ground), there is simply no way without it. 4. Sufficiently low noise. At iso 800 they are almost absent, at iso 1600 they are already noticeable, but if you develop from raw, again, they are practically absent. 5. In video mode, when shooting, you can change all the main parameters (in M). 6. Comfortable grip. It does not slip in the hands, it is quite comfortable to hold with one hand. 7. Simple and convenient menu.
Cons
  • Not "flaws", but my quibbles: 1. No autofocus when shooting video. It is available in slightly newer models: 650D and 700D. 2. The microphone is located so that you constantly cover it with your fingers, and the video is obtained without sound. 3. There is no autofocus adjustment for lenses (although this is usually only found on older models). 4. The screen shows a brighter and richer picture than it actually is.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The perfect purchase for me, exactly what I was looking for!

I have had this camera for about a year now. For beginner photographers, this is a great option. I mainly shoot dogs, portraits andcompetitions, so 3.7 fps is not enough for me, after 5 burst frames in Raw it starts to freeze, despite the fact that the card is 32 GB class 10, this can be fixed by buying 7d.. Exposure to 4000 years with a hole of 1.8 is very tight. Noise is visible at iso 800. In general, a good option, although the 650d and 700d have alreadycome to replace it. ? page=0…

Pros
  • Swivel screen, the ability to record full hd video, good ergonomics, in the hand lies like a glove.
Cons
  • 3.7 fps is not enough for me

Revainrating 5 out of 5

One of the best deals, glad I bought this.

The 600 is not in vain the most popular digital SLR in the history of their production. There is simply no camera with such a price / quality ratio today. Ofcomurse, like any DSLR, it requires: a) serious investments in lenses, external flash, filters, etc. , and b) sufficient knowledge to shoot in RAW in M, Av and Tv modes. If you are going to shoot with a whale, in JPEG and in auto mode, you will get a big bulky inconvenient soap dish. Separately, I note the very high quality of video with…

Pros
  • Excellent matrix, the same as on older crops (60D, 7D). Working ISO up to 1600, excellent detail, very beautiful picture (on good glasses). Reliable, hardy, unpretentious. The grip is more comfortable than on Nikon 5100 - 5200. High quality video.
Cons
  • Not the fastest and most accurate autofocus. Weak battery.

Previously, I had been using soap, specifically SAMSUNG ST-70. As a result, I went out and bought a brand new SLR. I was completely clueless about iso, crop factor, matrix, aperture, etc. Checked out every Canon and Nikon model. Consented to this structure. I bought it, snapped a few photos, and then refused to put the camera down for two weeks. It's not a professional camera, but it's great for amateurs just starting out. I still make use of it, as there are currently no alternatives in its…

Pros
  • In addition to being inexpensive, having a swivel screen, 19 megapixels, a good flash, and producing superb video, this camera is also quick to fire, easy to grip, and intuitive.
Cons
  • The video does not feature autofocus. Ignored it after a while

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Wonderful quality, one hundred percent satisfied!

Didn't regret buying it. I didn't give any other brands of cameras or lenses a second thought before going with Canon. I am interested in two models, the 550d and the 600d. It is recommended to take 600d. The screen has been removed, which means that it will live longer and the convenience when shooting is also a positive; however, you will need to exercise caution with it because it is the camera's most vulnerable area (although it does not look flimsy). Takes good video. It was unnecessary to

Pros
  • The menu is really easy to understand. It is possible to complete the task without instructions. To my surprise, it wasn't that heavy at all, but it was really comfortable. Maintains a charge for an extended period of time.
Cons
  • It has not been found as of yet.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Matches the description completely, very satisfied.

I've always wanted a DSLR, so the camera is cool. This one, which includes my first camera in this class, was a gift from the hubby! Of course, I still don't understand everything, but my hands are already tingling to purchase him a flash. The standard one is obviously insufficient (my sister has a 450 model and a separate flash was purchased, thus the images turn out fantastic!). Although decent lenses are more expensive than cameras, it wouldn't harm to buy one. Although I've always wished…

Pros
  • A quality battery (on a two-week vacation, shooting almost without a break, it never charged, and even worked for a long time before being discharged upon return) many of settings, simple menu photo caliber (with the right settings) rapid shooting in favorable circumstances (light, distance, etc.)
Cons
  • Flash is poor Zuma desires more. The macro may not always appear, but in this case it's conceivable that I simply lack experience. From the viewpoint I would prefer, it takes the improper position. Sometimes he's mischievous and refuses to shoot in automatic mode because it's dark, focuses for a very long period, or he doesn't like how close the object is (in short, very smart). Also, while using auto mode, the picture of the child often comes out fuzzy, even with sudden movements. Even the outdated Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W55 camera managed to complete these tasks twice!

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best I ever used, recommend it to everybody.

A beginner's dream camera because it first produces so many errors. The sharpness is adequate, but the truncated matrix makes it clear that sometimes you don't have enough room to move back to get what you need in the frame. I immediately purchased a 50mm 1.8 lens for myself. Moreover, 16mm on a 5D2 captures FAR MORE than 18mm on a 600D when photographing landscapes. From the first pictures I took with this camera, I was smitten. I won't ever totally give it up in favor of FF! It will continue…

Pros
  • * Dimensions (for me! - The buttons are all located under the right fingers and fit properly in the hand without slipping (not like 1100D) * reduced matrix (yeah, on the one hand this is a positive) - easier with zoom lenses than on FF * Swivel screen (I use it solely when viewing images already shot), which so far has only came in handy once (which is amazing) whale lens * (Yes, this is a plus for me because it produces extremely intriguing photographs in good lighting.) There are a ton of "glasses" available for relatively little money thanks to *Canon.
Cons
  • * truncated matrix (after all, now for portraits there is a great desire to buy 5d2 for yourself) * unlike 60D, a weak battery - with the display turned off up to 650-700 shots (at 60D up to 1200), in lifeview mode - up to 250 shots. That are really the only flaws

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I like the product, the quality didn't let me down.

I purchased it primarily for videography because I make both personal short films and videos for friends. So long as the HD format was available, it was easy to use, and it didn't cost as much as a professional video camera, that was what I was looking for in a price to quality ratio. With the way the images and videos were shot, I'm quite happy. Sadly, the original edition is not well suited for photography in a dark environment; you either purchase a fast lens or turn on a light, but these…

Pros
  • HD video with a swivel screen
Cons
  • sluggish focus at night

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great quality, did not expect at all for the price.

September 2022 saw the purchase of the camera. I first had to decide between the Nikon 5000 and the Kanan 600. When I put Nikon to the test, the photographs were decent but frequently grainy and lacking in brightness. But as soon as I picked up the Canon 600, I knew I was keeping it. The main flaw with the photographs is that the basic lens is not very nice. But it will do for now. I had been using the far poorer Canon EOS 550d before that. The 550's functionalities aren't perfect, and it has…

Pros
  • extremely good shots. lying comfortably in the hand. When filming from the top or bottom, the rotating display is really useful. several helpful features, among other things.
Cons
  • Even while nighttime photography is not the best, if you shoot on "P," it is practically nothing!

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The right product for me, the price suited me.

I bought this gadget because of the positive ratings, however I'm really unhappy with its construction. The camera's grip groans every time it's used. The dust under the glass was "sucked" by the screen for two days. I returned it to the shop and got a replacement, but this one has some creaking and playing in the handle, too. According to the service center, nearly all of the most recent production runs have quality control and assembly issues. If someone has a problem with the assembling…

Pros
  • Up to an ISO of 800, pictures are usable.
Cons
  • Good construction.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

High-quality product, the price corresponds to the quality.

To each his own, as they say, but I instantly liked this youngster when I saw him in the window and have never regretted purchase because he does what a soap dish, in theory, cannot. Better than a car because it takes care of everything on its own, using a manual lens is preferable when photographing nature. It is preferable to select a richer lens because the buzz is greater (18-135) and the cost is higher by 10,000. The guidebook resembles an entire book. But it took me less than 30 minutes…

Pros
  • Picture clarity, swivel display, respectable lens, built-in flash, neck strap, not heavy, appears to be large, rich in features, simple menu, comfortable in the hand, and reasonably priced for a semi-professional.
Cons
  • They did not appear to me in this monstrosity.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Good product for me, no problems at all.

a Canon 600D camera was bought. I felt good for exactly two weeks. Then… I discovered a defective collection of pixels rather than just a single pixel. With Photoshop, I counted anything between 30 and 48 squares. I consider a square to be a pixel. Depending on what color the object was that the provided spot appeared on, there will be a different amount of squares. If this is a marriage, is it the justification for exchanging the camera, I questioned the maker. This is not a marriage, the…

Cons
  • A small bright red spot of 30-40 pixels (depending on the background), just below and slightly to the left of the center of the frame. absence of tracking autofocus while recording video.

After using the Canon PowerShot SX20IS for a while, I decided to upgrade. I did a lot of research on the 600D and spent a lot of time reading about its benefits and drawbacks. When I actually held it, though, all of my preconceived notions were cast aside. After a period of two months of studying and taking practice pictures, they requested me to photograph a wedding because they were pleased with the results. 1.4 Canon is a newbie to the brand. Has some pros: The camera has a quick and…

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Didn't quite buy it well, had a little trouble using it.

Canon's reluctance to introduce a universal battery standard for its consumer DSLRs begs the question: why? Why do I require a separate jack for an external microphone? Third, crammed in options to "resize," "assessment," and "art filters" for images. Such "excesses" are, in my opinion, completely unjustifiable in an SLR camera. Users' complaints that focusing is unavailable when recording video are accurate. Same thing goes for the Canon EOS 500D. It has not yet been decided if the "Disp"…

Pros
  • This isn't my first digital single-lens reflex camera. The only benefit I can think of is the Swivel Screen. Beyond that, I know nothing about it.
Cons
  • ISO 3200 is NOT adjustable in the preset modes. Indoors, you should avoid using ISO 3200 and above, regardless of the lighting or the aperture of your lens.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A nice option for the money, one of the best deals.

Throughout the short amount of time that I utilized it, everything worked perfectly for me. After we ended our relationship with the girl, and she took the DSLR away from me; nonetheless, if I decide to purchase another DSLR, I will give this model the highest priority. The canon is of good quality, the matrix is also of high quality, and the body is comfy. In addition, Kenon is equipped with a vast selection of lenses, some of which were produced by other companies (the same Tamron). This is…