Camera Canon PowerShot G15 Review

High-quality and practical advanced compact. If it had a . inch matrix with all the others, for most amateurs there would be a camera for all occasions. PS. Over the years, only made sure that the G15 as a whole was the best in its category. His branch on club. Photo. Ru. is still alive, and the branches of direct competitors withered . Has some pros: Quality build. Convenient manual control. Well sits in the hand. Pretty fast, fast, photo quality is much better than compacts with a matrix of

I have been using this device for over a year now. What can I say, the device is very well assembled, it's a pleasure to use it. Never failed. The photo quality is good, I only take pictures with manual settings. Ofcomurse, this is a soap dish, although it is advanced and the photo qualitycomrresponds to an advanced soap dish, even an entry-level SLR is not acompetitor. After a year of use, I was drawn to better equipment, I will take a DSLR, but this camera will be like a spare pocket option…

I had both G7 and G9 and G11 - over time I gave them to my nephews - and I stick to this line - it's painfully easy to use - even children get great photos. The colors are bright, the high-level stabilizer - you can take cool pictures on the go - not every optic can do this . it's clear that this is a pure figure - but it practically does not become outdated . The G7 still works, although its resource has long been exhausted. . High reliability housing. Great choice.

For the previous 8 years, he held nothing but a SLR in his hands. When I was presented with the G15, I was pleasantly surprised at how much the "soap dishes" had advanced during this time. It makes no sense to compare this model with full or partial crop matrices, but for a compact camera that fits in a jacket pocket, it shoots just fine. At the same time, it is also suitable for a beginner, thanks to perfect automation and as a "camping" camera for those who are used to more serious equipment.

bought in Cambodia as a second fotik paired with the D700. after receiving the results from Lightroom, he left it without hesitation. Canon finally did not spare a good glass for a compact and as a result, the best compact that could be held in hands (corrected for the Panasonic LX7 - it has bypassed it for the time being expensive). that's what the G9 was supposed to be.

Not only the lens, but also all other optical surfaces are too optimistic, in my opinion, left uncovered or not recessed enough in the body. So it seems too easy to scratch something. However, so far this has not happened. Although, in a couple of months, about 2 thousand pictures were taken. The camera is mostly worn in a very successful LowePro Santiago 30 bag. Bought in July for ~~18900. Although it was possible to order via the Internet for 5 thousand cheaper. This is a fee for the…

I used canon G11 and G1 X. And I can say with confidence that compared to model 11, 15 did not become some kind of breakthrough or cool novelty. The final frame quality remains comparable, especially if you also process the photo. The high aperture of the lens is, of course, good, but it does not affect the quality and convenience of shooting as much as we would like. For example on G11 with max. aperture 2.8 in an ordinary apartment with two lighting lamps at iso 100, shutter speed is about

Disappointed in digital photography. The prices are insane, the results are not up to par. I shoot on film. But I think a good compact should be, so that it would always be at hand. I haven’t bought this camera yet - I’m waiting for either the price to drop, or even better, an analogue with a swivel screen will come out. Maybe manufacturers will listen to the opinion of consumers

Pros: the equipment is better than Nikon's DSLRs! excellent manual mode . the video is better than Panasonic's, the stabilizer is also better. Its cons: On self-written discs, the video is jerky . not all dvds see the video format from the G-15 biting price!

With its pros. I don't know much about photography, but this one has amazing light sensitivity. All photos are crisp and clear. Even in poor lighting conditions, the camera manages to make masterpieces, without unnecessary noise. It is convenient to use, I have not seen before that video shooting can also be done in custom modes (there is a separate button for video that works in the set mode). I took photos underwater - unusually, excellent pictures. + A large number of manual settings, bu

A camera with great capabilities, which are practically not needed by an amateur who shoots mainly on the machine. A very good camera.

In AUTO mode, the auto selection of focus points works fine, (intuitively guessing the subject), although this does not affect the quality of the pictures, the very “Canon” zest is missing (the pictures are not tasty, if I may say so) front. If you print photos 10x15, then there are no questions. For those who picked up a CANON camera for the first time, the attached instructions will obviously be missed. Whoever this is not the first acquaintance will understand that, in fact, there is nothing

Single-lens compact cameras with fixed lenses are needed as a class. And do not compare them with DSLRs. Why are they needed? Because they are convenient, everything is included, they are immediately ready for work, for dummies they work well on the machine, for non-dummies you can set up and manage the process. In digital cameras, first of all, everything is determined by the matrix and processor, and lenses and functions can already be wound around them. In general, I was a theoretical…

Very pleased with the camera. Never wished I had bought it. Despite some shortcomings, the device deserves 5 stars. For the sum of the most important advantages allows you to break away from competitors - compacts. Got pros: Listed in descending order of importance: 1. Fast optics (1.8-2.8) And this is at 5x zoom! 2. Optimal, universal range of focal lengths (28-140). 3. Good image processor. In particular, noise reduction, which allows you to "smooth out" noise when increasing iso. At…

I bought it to replace my combat G9 and did not regret it, everything for which I appreciated my previous non-killable camera is only lighter, with new features and a better lens. The transition was completely painless and the impressions so far are only positive. At the same time, the G15, unlike the G10, G11, G12 and G1 X, is much thinner and, in terms of ergonomics, is much closer to compact cameras. I deeply respect modern photographic equipment with large lenses and modern mirrorless…

The battery eats up quickly if the options for continuous and tracking autofocus are enabled. If the tracking is still sometimes useful, then I advise you to turn off the continuous immediately. If you turn them off, then the battery is enough for 300 shots, but for me it's 2 days =) I shot mostly in RAW in aperture priority mode, sometimes in manual. With the help of the Digital Photo Professional program in the kit (I only advise you to ate it right away), it is very easy to process. In…

I couldn't be happier with the camera. Never once did I regret not purchasing it. The product still merits five stars even though it has a few drawbacks. Since the accumulation of your most significant advantages enables you to get an advantage over your most formidable rivals, compacts. Got pros: Following is a list, in decreasing order of importance: 1. Quick optics (1.8-2.8) Note that this is at a 5x magnification! 2. range of focus lengths that is optimal and applicable universally…

I choose a compact camera to pair with my "reflex" camera with a dozen lenses. And therefore I approach this issue seriously, I walk around the shops and test. First of all, I check the matrix noise using a special test, since this problem can ruin all the other advantages. 1) Even if you shoot in JPG, the extremely small (negligible) noise starts from ISO 800-1000 and up to 1600 is quite working. I am shocked by such high parameters! Few competitors, even much more expensive ones, perform so…

A very good camera!. I haven’t been using it for long yet, and theoretically you can expect something unpleasant in terms of a purely technical one, but it’s made in Japan . I’ve had three cameras of the same series and everything is fine with them. . Has some pros Compared to G12, since it is positioned as a continuation, there are quite a few pluses: - very good aperture (you can not increase the sensitivity now in those cases where, when using, for example, a Canon G1x camera, you could not

G 15 tym owned four hours. I didn’t feel any greater disappointment from the purchase. Until this year, there was Nikon P7100. Everything would be fine, but landscapes, alas, this product gave out disgusting quality. Crystal sharpness of the foreground and absolutely failed distance. clouded with a gray-blue haze. Bad in one word. I had to edit through Photoshop. What. one cannot say about the pictures of the blessed but deceased G9 from Canon. This one did everything right and the air is…