Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
canon 16 35mm 2 8l iii lens logo

Canon 16 35Mm 2 8L III Lens Review

5

·

Excellent

Revainrating 5 out of 5  
Rating 
5.0
👓 Lenses, 📷 Camera & Photo

View on AmazonView on ЯM

Media

(4)
img 1 attached to Canon 16 35Mm 2 8L III Lens
img 2 attached to Canon 16 35Mm 2 8L III Lens
img 3 attached to Canon 16 35Mm 2 8L III Lens
img 4 attached to Canon 16 35Mm 2 8L III Lens

Photos by authors

(2)
img 5 attached to Canon 16 35Mm 2 8L III Lens
img 6 attached to Canon 16 35Mm 2 8L III Lens

Details

BrandCanon
Lens TypeWide Angle
Compatible MountingsCanon EF
Camera Lens Description35 millimetres
Maximum Focal Length35

Description of Canon 16 35Mm 2 8L III Lens

High performance L-series ultra-wide-angle zoom lens with constant f/2.8 maximum aperture. All-new optical design for significant improvements in outer and corner sharpness. Sub wave length Coating (SWC) and Air Sphere Coating (ASC) help to significantly reduce flare and ghosting. Highly resistant to dust and water intrusion, enabling shooting even in harsh conditions. Circular aperture (9 blades) helps deliver beautiful, soft backgrounds. Not an Extender Compatiblity. Magnification with Extension Tube EF12 II- 0.65 at Tele (Not compatible at Wide). Magnification with Extension Tube EF25 II- 1.14 at Tele (Not compatible at Wide).Lens Construction:16 elements in 12 groups.Filter Size: 82 millimeter, P=0.75 millimeter: 1 filter.

Reviews

Global ratings 5
  • 5
    5
  • 4
    0
  • 3
    0
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    0

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is at the level, I am satisfied with everything.

Acquired for shooting mainly landscapes and architecture. The lens copes with this task just perfectly. Detailing is at a high level, the lens demonstrates very high sharpness over the entire range of focal lengths and almost across the entire field of the frame. Separately, you can also highlight the accuracy and speed of autofocus. At the same time, at the maximum focal length of 35 mm, if desired, you can shoot half-length and full-length portraits. The bokeh is soft, with even blurry…

Pros
  • Sharpness, color reproduction, fast focusing, build quality. Easily produces soft bokeh.
Cons
  • Didn't find it.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The purchase brought only positive emotions.

Pros: The optics has become better in contrast to the 16_35 II, the new lens is sharper by 16mm, the color reproduction has been corrected, the skin has ceased to give off earthy shades. Has cons: The price is exaggerated considering that the case is not metal

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A really necessary purchase, I'm glad I found this product.

Bought for 100K in Hong Kong on Savelovsky, while the official cost 160K. After the purchase, it simply stuck to the carcass - I was struck by its accuracy and focusing speed, and therefore my lenses from Sigma immediately became outdated, the difference is colossal. After the purchase, he immediately went into battle, snapped them off almost the entire wedding, ran in, so to speak, after which he studied the photo in more detail on the computer on the back-front focus object, and did not find…

Pros
  • Weight: for a wedding reportage, that's it. Waterproof for sure. Fast and accurate focusing. Large: looks solid.
Cons
  • 1. Well, he has a cosmic value. 2. Lightweight, which does not inspire confidence in terms of reliability. 3. Very dark at 16mm

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality exceeds all expectations, I recommend to buy.

16-35 I think you should not change the second version for the third one. If you are looking for the first, and the last, cool, best, wide - you have found it! Got pros: Now this is my favorite lens, before that I was stuck with the 135L fix. I chose two months between the 16-35 II version, and the fix 24mm II and 24-70mm. As a result, I stumbled upon this glass - freaked out, took it, so as not to waste time on comparisons. I squeal like a little girl. He is sharp, and when you need to be…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am amazed! It was definitely worth the money!

Previously used 16-35 2.8 II and 16-35 4 IS. The first was just awful around the edges and corners at focal lengths up to 24mm. For this reason, it was completely unsuitable for landscape or architecture. At 35 mm, it also did not shine with sharpness. Appeared on sale 16-35 4 IS, bought it. He turned out to be evenly sharp at all focal lengths over the entire area of ​​​​the frame. However, I was not pleased with the color and contrast. It seemed duller in these plans compared to 16-35 2.8 II,

Pros
  • Excellent and uniform detail across the entire field, at all focal lengths and at all apertures. Resolves all 30 megapixels of the 5D Mark IV. Focuses quickly. Misses were not noticed on any of the focus points. Wonderful colors and contrast. Nice background blur.
Cons
  • Strong vignetting at 2.8. At 16 mm, it's just the wildest. However, it is easy to correct programmatically.