Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
dorman 82173 front/rear driver side interior replacement door handle – sleek & durable design logo

Dorman 82173 Front/Rear Driver Side Interior Replacement Door Handle – Sleek & Durable Design Review

4

·

Very good

Revainrating 4.5 out of 5  
Rating 
4.3
💅 Body & Trim, 🛠️ Replacement Parts

View on AmazonView on ЯM

Media

(3)
img 1 attached to Dorman 82173 Front/Rear Driver Side Interior Replacement Door Handle – Sleek & Durable Design
img 2 attached to Dorman 82173 Front/Rear Driver Side Interior Replacement Door Handle – Sleek & Durable Design
img 3 attached to Dorman 82173 Front/Rear Driver Side Interior Replacement Door Handle – Sleek & Durable Design

Description of Dorman 82173 Front/Rear Driver Side Interior Replacement Door Handle – Sleek & Durable Design

Replace the handle and not the entire door panel. Color: Chrome. OE#: 2L7Z-7821819-AB, 7L1Z 7821819-A, 8L1Z 7821819-A.

Reviews

Global ratings 4
  • 5
    2
  • 4
    1
  • 3
    1
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    0

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

No resistance! - Body and fairing

Tardo más de lo indicated en llegar y es muy frágil. Fue fácil y rápido instalarlo pero después de 2 days de uso se se quebro.

Pros
  • Weight
Cons
  • Weight

Revainrating 5 out of 5

If you have a broken interior door latch, this is for you!

Don't waste your time and money on a cheaper version of this, you'll just buy and install another one before you know it. I've been buying the Dorman brand for years and have had nothing but good luck with everything I've gotten from them!

Pros
  • Lots of positive vibes
Cons
  • No performance

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Defect in the visible chrome.

This grip is a direct replacement for the factory part and performs as expected. The problem with this is that there's a rough white visible square area on the back that hasn't been chromed. This area is from the manufacture of the part and should be on the inside of this handle where it cannot be seen by the occupants of the car.

Pros
  • Durable Test Results
Cons
  • A newer model could have been chosen