- Accelerate the process of heat loss.
- Price
- Nothing remarkable to note
- Extremely high in cost.
- per-core performance Once installed, go into the BIOS, and you're done cold; you can lock turbo boost on all cores on boards with B360 6 productive, clean cores without dancing with a tambourine.
- With vsync off, CPU use in some games can approach 90–99%; the highest consumption I've ever seen in a blender was 112w.
- I am writing about 9600k, xs why it gets into reviews about 9400f, what can I say, if you want the maximum fps in any game, then here is your choice
- Is that the price in our market
- Speed in games. Overclocking capability.
- Price. But the course is not at all the same as it was in 2022.
- 6 ultra-fast cores at an affordable price. Quite cold overall.
- Temperature jumps on the core.
- there is
- No
- Of the pluses, only a slight heat release can be noted. And that is all
- Price, price and more price
- They are not here
- this processor is a flaw. if you have a motherboard with an h110m chipset, then you will have to change it, since this processor has a different power scheme. Question: why it was impossible for this processor to work with the h110m chipset, because the sky lake and kady lake processors work fine with this chipset, if necessary, for the kady lake to work correctly, you need to ate the bios? there is no software for graphics management for the integrated video card, no drivers for windows 8 and below. Question: why it was impossible to develop graphics management software, why it was impossible to write drivers for windows 8 and below?
- everything flies (review about 9600k)! no dancing with tambourines! reasonable price (thanks to competitors) will be relevant for a long time
- does not send me money
- overclocking potential and high fps in games
- thermal chewing gum under the lid, because of which the temperatures are not ideal, but there is a reserve, and also the 3 core is heated above the rest up to 10 degrees
- - Price (it cost me 12 tr) - Full 6 cores - Tech process! (Thus low energy consumption and heat dissipation) - Price to power ratio - The most affordable 6 nuclear percent in the coffee lake line - Performance on par with i7-7700 - Bypasses AMD Rayzen 5 1600 - Can save on cooling due to low heat dissipation
- - Cost of motherboards for socket 1151-v2
- Excellent processor with integrated video core, high performance, low power consumption, but only suitable for Windows 10. Switched from i5-661 first generation. According to my feelings, the increase in processor performance approximately fits into a simple formula for the ratio of the products of the number of physical cores to the frequency. In my case (2.3 * 6 ) / (3.3 * 2) - about 2 times, nothing more. That is, in different tasks, the increase is felt differently, from 0 to 2 times. The transition is justified mainly due to the fact that navigating the Internet has become very resource-intensive, and I use dozens of tabs at the same time and the OS itself all the time does something for someone that I don’t ask it to do and the further , the more.
- There are no Intel UHD graphics 630 video drivers for Windows 7. A strange decision by Intel, they narrowed the market to themselves. This is a fundamental shortcoming. That is why 6th generation Intel Core processors are no cheaper than modern 8th generations.