As for processor heating, I can say the following on mATX board, Noctua NH-D15S cooler. The maximum temperature during the AIDA64 stress test (the test lasted 30 minutes) thermal paste was included, I decided to use it. Simple 30-35. Stress test 70 degrees.

I changed my old i7 3770K to this processor. Of course, I had to upgrade the mother (I took the GIGABYTE Z490 AORUS PRO AX), DDR4 memory and NVME SSD (for everyone), but it's worth it, it's nice to have all the most modern under the hood. I did not overclock, performance and so with a margin. In RDR 2 on Ultra settings in FHD with an RTX 2070 Super card, the processor load is on average 23%, the video card is loaded to the full. Lowered the dynamic voltage in the BIOS by 115 mV. In the Aida 64

Before this review, there was a bad review, apparently I wanted twice the performance compared to my former i7 7700 k, but it still makes sense to replace it. I don’t need AMD for nothing, of course, everything on the Internet is littered with positive reviews about their processors, but there are real tests of people who made them for themselves, and there are other numbers, and the fact that AMD is cheaper than Intel, their old processors, so there’s no point in comparing at all , a bunch of…

I bought it to replace my i7 3770, in tests the performance is 3 times higher and this is in stock, overclocking can raise the difference up to 4 times. I won’t say that 10700 is colder or hotter than mine, if you drive to 5.2, then the temperatures are high 75-80 on custom dropsy, not from famous brands. If you don’t run tests, then 5.2 keeps it comfortable in games, because there is nothing to load it with, loading in games is a maximum of 20%, and my old man, for example, in the last NFS…

A good stone for those who are building a top or pre-top computer since mid-2022. The percent forces you to switch from 1151v2 to the new socket 1200, bribing with a good price. Another question is that mothers for this socket are noticeably more expensive than those for 1151, but over time this should return to normal. Prots did not overclock, there is enough turbo boost, but for enthusiasts - all roads are open. The stone is hot, so choose cooling to match, either dropsy, or for CBO lovers…

I'm just a tester. I can add more cons - Price [BUT! no need to criticize! Why ? Because no one should buy at that price. There is always a choice! If you bought this percent from you, then you had a reason for it!] - Heat dissipation [Yes hot ! But still, the manufacturer has nothing to do with it. They don't need everything to be cool and cheaper. Pretend that you are the head of Intel. Everyone wants nailed]

It stands in a compartment with the MSI MPG Z490 GAMING EDGE WIFI motherboard and is cooled by the budget (in my opinion, average) ID-COOLING AURAFLOW X 360 water cooler, at the peak, the maximum that I have seen is 85 degrees with a power consumption of 230W, I think it will be colder with a good dropsy (this and noisy, and not very overclocked for a 10700K), I use Gelid GC-Extreme thermal paste.

Who wanted to buy the i9 9900k, but did not have time to buy it safely, since they are identical, but the price is different. Of the minuses is the purchase of identical motherboards with a small overpayment. I bought a Gigabyte Z490 AORUS ELITE AC motherboard for 18k and a similar GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI motherboard is for sale for 14k, the only difference is the socket and wi-fi generation. The price of i7 10700k box is 32k, and the price of i9 9900k box is 38-40k on average. And here it

As always, Intel took the path of increasing megahertz and for good reason! Because I still remember my Stump 4 of the distant 2022s, which tore everything and everyone with its power, working at a frequency of up to 4 GHz. After the transition to multi-core systems, an important component was lost, the number of cores was increased and the clock frequency was reduced. For a long time I sat at 3.2 GHz without the possibility of overclocking. And here all 8 cores and 16 threads - you can…

Moved from 4770K to 10700K. A good stone in general, but perhaps a passable one. The main reason for the upgrade is a hackintosh that is close in performance to a 2022 iMac 27" with the same gem. The next macs will probably no longer be on Intel, so this seems to be the last "civilian" gem suitable for hackintosh. Given the not so big increase in productivity over 7 years, this will probably be enough for the same amount, if not more.