Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 66
  • 5
    51
  • 4
    10
  • 3
    5
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    0

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The right product for me, there were no problems.

In order to avoid any misunderstandings, I will state right off the bat that I will be discussing the number 3770, omitting the K, T, and S. It turned out that it was enough for almost everything, except for virtual machines and video processing; as a result, the Pentium served for more than a year, and it is now resting. I took it to work in various programs, to replace the Pentium G630, which was originally taken as a plug. I took it to replace the Pentium G630 because it was originally taken

Pros
  • A quick and sophisticated processor.
Cons
  • Under the cover are the cost and the thermal paste.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I like the product, the quality didn't let me down.

It is recommended that a closer look be taken at those individuals who do not set maximum overclocking as their goal, as it accelerates up to 4200 and functions normally without any issues. In general, the percentage is not bad. We are able to claim that this is the frequency with which it occurs regularly. Next, you are going to need a decent cooler; I already own an average Zalman that can hold 1.5 pieces, so I won't be driving anymore. For me, the most significant issue is that the built-in…

Pros
  • In the event that you do not break records for overclocking, then the temperature ranges from 30 to 48 degrees, depending on the load. The performance is of the highest caliber. There are stones and fasters, of course, but the amount of money required to purchase them is already insufficient for the typical user.
Cons
  • It cannot be overclocked to the same extent as its predecessor. In certain applications, the built-in graphics engine behaves in an odd manner. Climbed on an Internet, a lot of complaints about HD graphics. Intel is certainly performing better than AMD in this regard. My opinion is that the cost is excessive.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Best product I have ever reviewed, I recommend it to everyone!

I got it at the end of 2022, when the top-end model was the 4770k, but I settled for the 3770; now, with the Kingston Hyper x 1333/1600 and the GTX1080Ti, I devour all games on ultra settings without breaking a sweat. This is despite the fact that I got 8 giga-ops, which I currently consume only in a web browser while playing a web-based game.

Pros
  • Well understood, quickly executed, and affable
Cons
  • In a word, no.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

There are some variations, but tolerable on the whole.

If you're still using a computer with a 1155 socket in 2022, you'll need to upgrade. Both the i7 Ivy Bridge 3770 and the i7 Ivy Bridge 3770k are among the very best options for this socket. The killer of the old i7—the i3-8100—has put an end to the whole circus, rendering it pointless to spend 8-11 percent of one's income on an antiquated computer at a cost of 5,000–6,000 rudders.

Pros
  • As of the year 2022, the 1155 socket computer can be updated to be functional.
Cons
  • price of thermal paste with a cover in 2022: $9.50 to $12.50

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Best thing for the money, glad I did it.

Has pros: It pulls everything that is on the PC. I took it for games, everything just flies without lags. With its cons. I've been using it for a week and a half, I haven't found it yet.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Wonderful quality, one hundred percent satisfied!

The 22nm i7 3770 runs hotter than the 65nm Core 2 Quad 6600 (77W vs 95W). The speed is about 2 times faster than the q6600, without overclocking. I put Mugen 3 on it, but it would be possible to get by with an old cooler. A great upgrade option for processor-intensive games and applications. Some pros: -8 threads (HT) -embedded video -support for PCI Express 3.0 -reduced power consumption Has cons: -price -small L2 cache -lack of overclocking capabilities (debatable)

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I didn't expect the quality to be so high.

And yes, I had to take a new mother on lga 1155, but with amd fx 6100 I wouldn’t have to. I think then I’d better take AMD (Cheap and cheerful). With its pros. Nimble, everything is as it should be. Qualitatively and wisely. The novelty of the gaming industry does not heat up. I took it for Crysis 3. Got cons: Of course, the price. It's a pity that the power is the same as the processor from AMD (AMD fx 6100). After all, the price seems to be quite different between 3500 and 9500.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Just super, the product is made wonderfully, very satisfied.

The motherboard burned out: it could not stand the day of mining. Earned 300, but lost the motherboard. I will find a new mother, I will continue to work with the processor. Even now, in 2022, the processor is relevant! Has some pros I've been using this processor for 5 years. ASUS RX580 video card. Never managed to load the processor more than 60%. Magnificent pro! Got cons: Immediately after the purchase, I scalped the stone - the paste under the lid was already dry. I replaced it with liquid

Revainrating 5 out of 5

One of the best deals, glad I bought this.

It was used for 6 years, after it was sold for the amount for which it was bought, after 3 years the thermal gum dried out and the heating increased by 10-15g, due to which the acceleration fell from 4.5-4.6GHz to 4.2. Even in this version, the speed is more than enough for any modern games and tasks. I recommend for those who are too lazy to change the platform. Some pros: +Performance + Long cycle life + Ability to overclock + Slow loss of value + Support for almost all modern technologies…

Revainrating 4 out of 5

A good and high-quality product, but there are disadvantages.

The core has a huge overclocking potential with a new technical process, when the heat dissipation in the chip itself is finalized, now no coolers can help. Pros below: It doesn't heat up at standard frequencies, well, at all :) 22 nm all the same :) When working at 4200 - 4500 Mhz - no glitches were noticed, the temperature is within the normal range of 40 C-50 C. Like a stone in the new must be system. Cons: When overclocking from 4500 to 4700, for example, the temperature jumps sharply…

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Nice price, good quality.

Overall, it's not bad, although it does have a few shortcomings. Has some pros Fast, really fast, after 5 years of using the e6550 this one is like lightning. It runs well, overclocked it to 4.4 (the mother of ASUS P8Z77-V PRO). Relatively cold, under load no more than 75. Uploading to all 100 is almost impossible, except that Photoshop and some other programs can do this . Relatively fast rendering. PCI Express 3.0 USB 3.0 (although there are few of them), since the mother had her own…

If you find such a percentage cheaper than 15 k, take it safely. With its pros. Perhaps I will write, three years later from the purchase of this processor for 11k wooden ones. And so the most important thing is a HUGE POWER STORAGE. And that is: + Easily chases and works constantly at a frequency of 3.80-4.06 without eating a lot of energy + Oddly enough, but the built-in video chip copes well with toys at minimum and medium levels (I checked it for the first time because I sold my video…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The right product for me, there were no problems.

I took the version i7 (3770k) I use it for 3 months, I highly recommend it to everyone. I am very satisfied. Before that, I used Core 2 Quad, the performance gain is very large. Pros: -windows 8 on it starts 5.5 seconds -overclocking to incredible frequencies (2022 overclockers set a record - overclocked to a frequency of 7.012 GHz) I have 4.6 -all games, all programs just fly. - very cold, even with simple cooling under heavy loads. -very economical. -score windows 8 - 8.5 points - I…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality exceeds all expectations, I recommend to buy.

I took at the end of 2022 at that time there was a top-end 4770k, but I decided to stop at 3770, now, together with the Kingston Hyper x 1333/1600 and GTX1080Ti, I eat all the games on ultras, without even straining, though I took 8 gigo-ops, which right now I eat only on browser with browser game

Pros
  • Fast, smart, friendly
Cons
  • Simply no.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

A good balance of price/quality, recommend it.

In general, the percentage is not bad, it makes sense to take a closer look at those who do not set maximum overclocking as their goal, it accelerates up to 4200 and works without problems. We can say that this is its regular frequency. Next, you need a good cooler, I have an average Zalman for 1.5 pieces, so I'm not going to drive anymore. For me, the main set-up is that the integrated graphics do not always work correctly. A vivid example of MODO, which just crashes or hangs. At work, I have

Pros
  • If you do not set records for overclocking, then it is quite cold 30-48 degrees, depending on the load. Performance is top notch. There are stones and faster of course, but they already cost quite inadequate money for the average user.
Cons
  • Not as overclockable as its predecessor. The built-in graphics core is weird in some programs. Climbed on an Internet, a lot of complaints about HD graphics. Intel is clearly outperforming AMD here. The price tag is high IMHO.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A very high-quality product, I take it not for the first time.

For two weeks, the CPU showed itself perfectly. Bought specifically for the workstation. I do not use a video card, so the presence of Intel hd graphics is very pleasing. Very fast and powerful. Archiving files, compiling ports in FreeBSD, running third-party OS in virtual machines. Everything is very fast. The purchase was fully justified. As a cheaper but no less powerful solution, consider the AMD FX-8150.

Pros
  • - 22nm process technology. High performance and low power consumption. CPU performance. Windows 7 rated: Processor: Calculation operations per second 7.7 - Low heat dissipation. In idle mode, it did not heat up more than 34-35 ° C. At load 40-41 °C. (My phone heats up more O_o). - Intel HD Graphics 4000. Support for DirectX 11, openGL 3.1, openCL 1.1, shader model 5.0. Connecting up to 3 monitors (although one is enough for me). Windows 7 rated: Graphics: Desktop Performance for Windows Aero 5.3 Graphics for gaming: 3D and gaming performance 6.5 - Support: PCI Express 3.0 controller, Thunderbolt interface, USB 3.0. - Unlocked multiplier.
Cons
  • - Price. Only for one Intel brand about 2022 we pay extra. On the other hand, we do not buy for a week .

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Everything in the purchase suits, a very necessary product.

I don’t know how it happened, but Intel created an incredibly high-quality and productive percent, and even with such a margin of time, relevance, I’m sure they bite their elbows. Now it’s 2022 in the yard and he is more alive than all the living. It is quite friendly with modern maps. Personally, I have made an assembly for 1060 gtx 6 gb and everything works quite well. Alas, time is running out, and all owners of this miracle will run into old ddr3 memory.

Pros
  • -Excellent performance. Even if it's already 2022 - Reliable as a cast-iron frying pan. - Doesn't get very hot
Cons
  • What could be the disadvantages of this processor? Is that at the moment the cost of motherboards for it.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best I ever used, recommend it to everybody.

And now the most interesting thing. few people talk about this and carefully wipe it on IXBT, but fans of overclocking i7-3x70K and even i7-2xx0K CPUs should take this into account. The fact is that in all overclocking manuals it is advised to disable C1E / EIST / C3 / C6. I've never done it, and as it turned out, not in vain. And here the point is that these functions, regardless of the Enable / Disable position, always work as if they are in the Enable position. It turned out by accident…

Pros
  • Power! energy efficiency)
Cons
  • The only) thermal interface that should be changed almost immediately. Now it's summer and it's hot. with the Intel thermal interface, the temperature under the linpack was 93-94 for the cores in such weather. After being replaced by Arctic Cooling, the MX-4 dropped to 83-86 cores. At the same time, the Zalman CNPS 10x Quiet cooler with the replaced fan is quieter than it worked with the Intel thermal interface.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Good product for me, no problems at all.

I bought the whole computer 5 years ago for 25k, and here in 2022 one percent costs almost as much, to put it mildly, I was very surprised. For a long time I worked at the factory frequency of 3.4GHz, and then I thought, why not overclock? In short, by default, I was chasing up to 3.9GHz, raised it to 4.4GHz, but suddenly artifacts appeared (maybe they had another reason), I didn’t risk a stone and lowered it a little to 4.2GHz, it works just fine. There is a "Thermaltake Frio Silent 12" cooler

Pros
  • - Quite good performance even at the beginning of 2022 - Excellent acceleration - Low heat dissipation
Cons
  • - I wanted to change the motherboard - there are very few options that give a good pair of percent + chipset, maybe even on the Intel website this percent is in the "outdated" tab, i. E. it's not worth waiting for new motherboards exactly for it.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best thing Ive ever used, a great item for everyone!

I am not a hacker, not an IT specialist, not an overclocker - a simple user, of which there are millions. So sorry for the lack of correct technical terms in the description, I will speak in my own words. I took a new percentage to work with the increased volumes of photos and videos. After reading a couple of articles about the correct overclocking, I myself found the necessary settings in the BIOS and lo and behold . now the percentage in normal mode shows 3900 MHz in AIDA, at a peak load of

Pros
  • - fast as a leopard :)) -cold as an iceberg - automatic acceleration - huge headroom for overclocking - multitasking is just super (three or four parallel open programs are no longer a problem)
Cons
  • As usual, the price. But good things can't be cheap.