Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
intel pentium graphics retail processor logo

Intel Pentium Graphics Retail Processor Review

26

·

Very good

Revainrating 4.5 out of 5  
Rating 
4.7
🧰 Computer Internal Components, 💻 Computer Components

View on AmazonView on ЯM

Media

(4)
img 1 attached to Intel Pentium Graphics Retail Processor
img 2 attached to Intel Pentium Graphics Retail Processor
img 3 attached to Intel Pentium Graphics Retail Processor
img 4 attached to Intel Pentium Graphics Retail Processor

Details

BrandIntel
CPU ManufacturerIntel
CPU ModelPentium
CPU Speed2.8 GHz
CPU SocketLGA 1155

Description of Intel Pentium Graphics Retail Processor

32nm dual-core chip. Socket H2 LGA 1155 Package and Intel SpeedStep Technology. Intel Virtualization Technology (VT-x) and Intel HD Graphics Processor Graphics. Its Dual Channel Memory Controller supporting up to 32GB DDR3. Process Type: Intel Pentium Dual-Core Desktop Processor G840. Frequency: 2.8 GHz. Cache: 3 MB. Process: 32 nm. Socket: Socket 1155. Power Consumption: 65 W.

Reviews

Global ratings 26
  • 5
    19
  • 4
    6
  • 3
    1
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    0

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Matches the description completely, very satisfied.

Better than 4-core phenom 9xx series, they heat up less, no worse. Enough for the average person. The memory bandwidth is 17 gigabytes per second, the x4 945 phenom had 7 gigabytes, I also set it up there for a long time, right away. Got pros: Fast, with good memory improves performance in games. Acceptable price. Has cons: Sometimes it gets dull, not quite cold (maybe I got one) 40 Celsius in idle time, I’ll buy a cooler for 10 bucks. Still, AMD processors on socket AM1 personally seemed to me

Revainrating 4 out of 5

A good product at a good price, I advise you to try it.

I bought a g860 video core, I was very surprised I did not expect it. Now it is working with 8 gigs of opera and gtx660. percent overclocked to 3100 on the bus. I don’t know, most likely he doesn’t open the video. used to be a hairdryer965 and hd6870. in games g860 and gtx660 faster frames by 10-20 (with an upgrade I got 100 bucks then I'll put i5)

Revainrating 5 out of 5

One of the best deals, glad I bought this.

G850. Installed on the mother z68, flashed the bios to uefi, installed 8gb 1333 MHz, installed ssd 60gb, tower-type cooler (the fan turned off), installed Windows 8 rtm 64). : photoshop lightroom (converting to jpeg 50 photos), 30 chrome tabs and a few more programs - does not exceed 45 degrees and this is on passive cooling, that is, only one case fan works. Torrent works at night, but the computer is not visible or heard. I don’t play games much, but the percentage allows you to play all…

Pros
  • cold cheap quite productive
Cons
  • square.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The item is of good quality, there is only one minor defect.

I have a G 850. I collected myself a cheap system unit with calculations for games. The choice fell on him as a lot compared with i3. I've been using it for 2 years now, I have to say. Its biggest disadvantage is the "bottleneck" (when during the game the CPU is loaded at 100% and the video is at 70-80%), this manifests itself in the form of a low fps even if the video card pulls at max. In conjunction with the GTX 650, I play many games at medium settings and . the video can be better, but…

Pros
  • price, cheap and cheerful
Cons
  • there is such a thing as a "narrow neck" that's about him.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Good value for money, I recommend it.

g850 I took it for 2300, plus a cooler for 600, quiet, almost inaudible. One core is loaded at 70 percent, the second at 50, and at least 50 frames / sec, in metro 2033 one core at 90, the second at 50, in cod mw3 the same way, at least 30 frames in both keeps on high with anti-aliasing, and at minimum not less than 60 to 150, that is, it is comfortable to play in principle. As. Creed 3 both cores are 95 percent, but at high (not maximum). At least 25 frames, sandy is productive in games, even

Pros
  • Price, low heating, good performance for such a price
Cons
  • All the same, 2 cores are not enough in our time, but I look at what the percent is taken for

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Do not hesitate to buy, the quality is amazing for the price.

Verycomld. Even on special heating pads like Linpack or CPUBurn, it warmed up to no more than 70 degrees, andcomnsumed no more than 45 watts - at a TDP of 65 W. The performance is at the level of a non-overclockedCore 2 Duo E8500, a wonderful formidable Wolfdale with a full cache (until recently youcomuld meet it at a price almost three times higher than the G840). And it's even faster than the Athlon II X4 620 (in terms of integrated performance in ixbt tests - see . Shtml)! I have a…

Pros
  • (G840): price, performance, coolness.
Cons
  • At this price, it's just ridiculous to talk about them. Even the lack of acceleration does not bother at all.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A nice option for the money, one of the best deals.

The processor was bought in 12, it is used to this day paired with 8GB of RAM and video GTS 450, the game pulls at a normal level. Stands on a working PC, photo processing, office applications like nuts clicks. I am satisfied. The socket is not eternal, but I consider upgrading to i7 2600 as a budget solution, especially since these processors are still relevant today

Pros
  • Cold, efficient enough
Cons
  • No, and it is unlikely to be, morally obsolete

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A great option for this money, one of the best offers.

I took it to replace the old iron. In the truest sense of the old: Pentium 4 661 3.6 ghz stood. This one turned out to be 3-4 times faster. Cold, thanks to a thinner process technology and the fact that the frequency drops to 1.6 GHz in idle. I have a Cooler Master TX3 cooler (it costs about 600) and in idle the temperature is 26-30 degrees, and under load it does not rise above 45-50, and this despite the fact that the revolutions are at the level of 900-1200 out of 2800 possible, i. E. . you

Pros
  • - Good solution for budget systems - Runs most games (paired with hd5850) at 1600x1200/1920x1440 - Weakly heated - Support for hardware virtualization. - The controller holds up to 32 GB of memory
Cons
  • - No overclocking in a budget processor - Weak video system - no app decoding.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best thing I've ever used, I recommend it to everyone!

Summing up, we can only welcome the appearance of new Pentiums. With them, the modern Intel platform LGA1155 becomes more attractive and expands the scope of its applicability. Intel has not had good universal platforms for a long time, and LGA1155, apparently, will finally be able to become one. Got pros: First of all, the Pentium G850 demonstrates impressive (for its price) performance in gaming applications. For inexpensive gaming computers, they fit perfectly, their superiority over…

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I have not regretted the purchase, everything is fine.

Different pros: a good solution for a cheap gaming computer I took the G860 because it has a higher frequency Cons: does not accelerate but I have a G860 so that's enough does not support memory with a frequency greater than 1333 Ghz

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best thing I've ever used, I recommend it to everyone!

In general, I bought an OEM version for 1900r (percent in film and nothing else) - an excellent processor for a home PC. If anyone for games - put the video card separately - that's all. With its pros: Description for G630. Normal such processor, bright, is not heated. Under light loads with a Titan cooler (I don't remember the model, unfortunately), it heats up to 35-38 degrees (at room temperature +28.30 now) , at the maximum - the maximum happened to heat up to 45 (the old version of the…

in general, look at what goals you need it for, the computer based on this stone turns out to be quite quiet (before that there was a hair dryer x4 heaven and earth) Windows rated it at 6.7, it works together with nv 650ti all games at maximum settings go smoothly, but how do I wrote much inferior in multi-threaded applications to 4 cores from amd (and 3 cores too) With its pros: Low heat dissipation, good single-threaded performance (relative to AMD) Has cons: 2 cores is its biggest drawback…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I was surprised by the quality for the price.

It pulls most games, although modern ones need something more powerful, with 4 cores. Crysis loads it in full, 1080p decodes without straining (the VLC process loads the percentage by 8-16%). Windows 7 interface flies. In SuperPi, 1M counted in 15 seconds. I installed two sticks of two gigs each, changed the built-in boost limit from 1100 to 1600 MHz and now I have it somewhere at the level of 7600 GT (the bus, consider, has become 128-bit). COD4 MW goes to medium at 1024x768, NFS MW to full…

Pros
  • Productive, 2 cores, not hot, integrated video core.
Cons
  • On the H61, it doesn't run on the bus, at least for me, but this is a flaw in the chipset, not the processor. Locked multiplier. But here I don’t know, it has Tcase = ~69 degrees, if you overclock by a factor of more than 4 GHz, then you need good cooling, costing half a processor, or even more. Although, i3s are a piece more expensive than this combination, plus a cooler. That is, theoretically, he could break the stock i3, costing less. Accordingly, i3 could bypass i5, and i5 - i7. What is the benefit for Intel?

Revainrating 4 out of 5

A good product at a good price, I advise you to try it.

Great price! Excellent performance! Do not overpay 6 thousand for hypertrading! While you can sit on it, and then transfer to the i5-2300, and overclock it on the bus in addition! (because the multiplier is blocked) Pros below: Fast, inexpensive processor. To start the transition to a new platform, you can take it, and then transfer to some i5-i7. New technical process. This is if you only imagine that it is more powerful than the Core 2 Duo E8600, which now costs at least 30,000 tenge (E8400…

I use Pentium G630 in conjunction with GT430 and 4GB DDR3. Full HD 1080p video, bluray is a pleasure to watch, without a hint of slowdown. Working on a computer (Windows 7, Explorer, Office) is comfortable, no expectations when downloading and running any applications. From toys I tried Skyrim and Far Cry2. Without slide shows, both work only at the lowest resolutions. But here the question is already in the video card. The choice is yours.

Pros
  • 1. Inexpensive; 2. "Cold" (together with the Zalman CNPS7000C-ALCu cooler at rest - 28C, at 100% load - 49C); 3. Built-in video Intel HD Graphics; 4. Productive for the money processor.
Cons
  • 1. Does not accelerate; 2. Upon purchase, it is issued without a box and even a bag of OEM version (actually like everyone else).

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Valuable purchase, nothing but pluses!

I play Wach Dogs, Crysis on ultras, and indeed the processor is good in games, but if it loads at 100%, the entire video card slows down, etc. As written in almost all the reviews "excellent value for money" is true.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I'm very happy, it really is worth buying.

Previously, the weak link was the CPU (5.4 points in Win7), but because of my slightly crooked hands, the motherboard (ga-m57 sli s4) failed, which served faithfully for 4.5 years and had to be changed, and at the same time RAM with CPU, because the CPU legs were bent, and DDR2 is not known to be compatible with DDR3. In my computer science school, sitting at a computer, I got into the system properties, device manager and Win7 HB performance counters and there I saw 6.8 in the CPU column, the

Pros
  • Performance, heat dissipation, native GPU
Cons
  • monitor did not work when connected to integrated graphics via DVI: mother GA-B75M-D3V Does not support RAM 1600 Mhz, shows 1333, on Ivy Bridge it does.