Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
💎 enhanced nanodiamond thermal paste conductivity performance logo

💎 Enhanced Nanodiamond Thermal Paste Conductivity Performance Review

3

·

Excellent

Revainrating 5 out of 5  
Rating 
5.0
🌡️ Thermal Management Products, 💡 Industrial Electrical

View on AmazonView on ЯM

Media

(4)
img 1 attached to 💎 Enhanced Nanodiamond Thermal Paste Conductivity Performance
img 2 attached to 💎 Enhanced Nanodiamond Thermal Paste Conductivity Performance
img 3 attached to 💎 Enhanced Nanodiamond Thermal Paste Conductivity Performance
img 4 attached to 💎 Enhanced Nanodiamond Thermal Paste Conductivity Performance

Description of 💎 Enhanced Nanodiamond Thermal Paste Conductivity Performance

Extremely High Thermal Conductivity and Stability: Thermal conductivity: 16(W/mK) Max. Temperature Stability(°C): -50 ~ 200. Super Carbon Nano-grade Material: This thermal paste compounds are grease-like products which is formulated with Nano diamond powder and silicone fluids as base oil, exhibits excellent thermal conduction thanks to its finer molecular structure produced by nanoscale treatment. Safe Application: Good performance is obtained when use JP-Dx1 heatsink paste for thermal conductivity of semiconductor devices, such as CPUs, ICs, High Power LED and power transistors. Metal-free and non-electrical conductive which eliminates any risks of causing short circuit, adding more protection to the CPU and VGA cards. High Durability: High chemical stability, being non-corrosive, anti-oxidation, non-toxicity, non-volatility, non-flammability, and causing no irritation to human skin. Thermal paste can withstand long-term storage, does not easily solidify, and can be readily implemented to the printing and coating process. The range will not harden or dry out or melt even after 1000 hours (200°C)with good single component modified silicone system suitable for heat sink application.

Reviews

Global ratings 3
  • 5
    3
  • 4
    0
  • 3
    0
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    0

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Works well enough, don't think it's actually 16 W/K

I took this to order to use it in my friend's montage. We used this paste because I ran out of Thermalright TF8 which I usually use (or TFX) and this paste claims to have a higher Wm/K compared to these two pastes. The performance I've seen on my friends' PCs (Ryzen 5 3600 / Hyper 212 Evo) is about the same as it was on TF8, but it's hard to tell unless I reinstalled it with TF8. I know that TFX is usually 2-3C better than TF8 in my own testing, so I'd say this paste is closer to 13Wm/K or a…

Pros
  • Extremely high thermal conductivity and stability: Thermal conductivity: 16 (W/mK) Max. temperature stability (℃): -50 ~ 200
Cons
  • Some little things

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Excellent heat output, but difficult to distribute evenly.

This thermal compound is ideal for use in laptops, GPUs and other low radiator mounting pressure and/or imperfect surface finish situations. In such cases, the thickness of this paste and the nanodiamond content ensure excellent heat transfer and prevent "pumping" due to temperature changes (which usually occurs with thin thermal compounds). The main downside to its performance is that this thermal paste isn't as easy to apply as popular less efficient products like MX-4. This paste is nice and

Pros
  • High durability: high chemical stability, no corrosion, anti-oxidation, non-toxic, non-volatile, non-flammable and no irritation to human skin. Thermal paste withstands long storage, hardens poorly and can be used in printing and coating processes without any problems. The range will not harden, dry or melt even after 1000 hours (200C) with a good one-component modified silicone system suitable for application as a heatsink
Cons
  • Doubtful purchase for the elderly

Revainrating 5 out of 5

It is at least as good as NT-H1 and MX4

As the owner of the 10 gram tubes of the Noctua NT-H1 and Arctic MX4, I wanted to see how good they are at the advertised 16 W/μΩ, which is higher than I think NT- H1 and MX4 have a "level rating" if one exists. This is definitely better than the Thermaltake TG-30, which is only 4.5 W/μΩ. I don't normally go by W/mk numbers, but the TG-30 performed particularly poorly when I tested it on a Dell XPS 15 2-in-1 and R5 3600X with a Noctua L9x65. I'm comparing this to the NT-H1 and MX4 because I've…

Pros
  • Nano Grade Super Carbon Material: This thermal compound is a grease-like product that contains nano diamond powder and silicone liquids as the base oil. Molecular structure obtained through nanoscale processing
Cons
  • Crumpled