📸 Nikon AF-S FX NIKKOR 18-35mm f/3.5-4.5G ED Zoom Lens - Auto Focus for Nikon DSLRs Review

I shot it with my D600, and it looks amazing across the board and in all but the telephoto range. Best value for the money, I typically shoot at 18mm and 35mm f5.6 - f8, making it ideal for travel. 1) 18-35 D is an expensive range for a technologically dated soap. 2) 16-35/4 G - the angles are slightly worse from 16mm to 28mm! Better, weather-proof, and VR (virtual reality), but double the price? Thirdly, the Tokina 17-35/4 (chromite 17-35/2.8D) is roughly 2.5 times more expensive and produces…

I originally took this miracle for landscapes, architecture, for the most part, The zoom ring did not force, as is usually the case in gles such as 24-70, 24-120 I often twist it by 18 according to the sensations, not completely, but it was deformed (or rather, an elastic band), With dimmed illumination, autofocus freezes between 1 Again, and there is enough light to focus (for example, fifty kopecks, he is a as accurate as a Mosin rifle, although he sometimes misses) By the way, junction of…

After buying the D600, but then somehow I couldn’ in addition to 28-300VR (by the way, I’m also very pleased), since the 28 14-24 2.8 has disappeared, as too heavy and sharpened for a specific task, + do not put on filters, Tokina also disappeared 16-28 2.8 you can't argue against physics, and for a hole 2.8 wide, you mostly shoot in good light, with the possible exception of indoors, but there the high working ISOs on the D600 1) Good old Nikkor 20mm 2.8 (screwdriver) 2) Nikkor 16-35VR f4…

I took this glass on vacation as a walker for shooting ancient bricks. In general, it’s quite good, but after a trip in an open jeep along serpentines, and filming on the go, I caught dust on the coast (where did it come from?) As for reviews like - sharp on fsekh apertures and focal - complete nonsense, it doesn’t happen like that, everything is like everyone else, across the field from 5.6, diffraction after 8.

Great lightweight super wide for a reasonable price. It has a razor-sharp pattern at all apertures and surprisingly pleasant bokeh. Distortions do not differ much from the older model in the face of 16-35 / 4 VR and are easily corrected either by in-camera algorithms or in the post-processing process. For low weight, you have to pay with plastic in the construct. Autofocus is not too quick compared to lenses of a class above, but it is almost inaudible.

Whoever chose a width for Nikon knows that this is not an easy task. I chose the width on the D800 for a long time, after countless test shots I took 18-35. Compared with 28, 16-35 and 14-24. 16-35 fell away, in general, by itself, and in general the hysteria about him is completely incomprehensible to me. The lens suffers from low resolution not only in the corners of the frame, but also just around the edges (especially at 35mm and low apertures). 2mm width is of course an argument, but for…

I liked the glass on the d800, excellent in the center, sharpness, not very sharp on the target, due to the significant curvature of the depth of field, sharpness generally drops to 35 mm. If you shoot at 5.6 - 8, then everything will be fine. HA small. Many say that the AF speed is not super fast, but it is sufficient and does not cause inconvenience even on dynamic subjects, in any case it is faster than at 50 / 1.4G.