Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 51
  • 5
    28
  • 4
    6
  • 3
    7
  • 2
    5
  • 1
    5

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A good quality product, I rate this purchase perfectly.

Ride on the second generation - liked it. On the third generation, it seems like there is less wear, but I can’t say for sure yet, I need to roll at least a dozen or two kilometers) . On the road, the car keeps fine and in the rain too. On soft ground, it doesn’t break much, you can leave without fanaticism (well, it’s not intended for this). Board . Here the board is afraid of everything that sticks out. It even breaks on a boulder or a curb sticking out unevenly. Fortunately, the guarantee…

Pros
  • Excellent asphalt grip at speed and in the rain. Quiet. Can be replaced under warranty.
Cons
  • Soft bead - can be easily torn in pits

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Everything is fine, there are only minor drawbacks.

Well, here I am the happy owner of this season's new Nokian Hakka Green 3 XL tires in size 195/65 R15. Car Toyota Prius 50. I took it because of environmental friendliness, fuel economy (Prius is still!) And other joys promised by marketers. I have already driven on these tires at the time of writing the post 2500 km. We can already draw some conclusions. The tire is very comfortable! Quiet, soft, rulitsya very well, keeps track, you go like on rails. Balanced out great. Through puddles up to…

Pros
  • Very, very comfortable tire)) Quiet, soft, well-kept rut - you steer on it like on rails.
Cons
  • And yet they wear out quickly! Save fuel? Well I do not know.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Overall it's not bad, but I expected more.

Bought tires in early April, immediately put on the car. When buying, the emphasis was on the guarantee, there were no reviews then. Size 195 60 15. What can I say about her. I have traveled about 20 thousand at the moment. The track is on average at a speed of 110. But it happens more. Mileage is more than city. I liked the grip on the rubber, it holds the road, it’s also confident in the rain. Noisy is the first minus. The second and perhaps the most important is wear and tear. Although the…

Pros
  • Holds the road well, warranty, free tire service.
Cons
  • Rapid wear

Revainrating 3 out of 5

It's not all bad, an average quality purchase.

Extended Warranty! It became like a quest-profanity. Previously, in case of problems with the wheel, I could call in the appropriate service. And upon presentation of the warranty card to receive repairs. Now I was given a link to the Nokian website and a huge list of what to fill out. But unfortunately, everything ends on scanning the check because it does not pass their verification. And as the "girl" on the hotline told me, if the check does not go through - goodbye guarantee . Actually, she

Pros
  • Outwardly, it does not differ much from Green2. holds well both wet and dry road.
Cons
  • The forerunner was the main one, this was rapid abrasion - we'll see. It turned out to be very noisy. The previous series was just noisy . and this one is just like riding a spike. Very weak sidewall, maybe even weaker than GREEN2.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Just super, it's beautifully made, I'm very happy with it.

Prior to that, went to Kama Euro. Heaven and earth. If Kama is pumped up more than 2 atmospheres, every crack in the asphalt is felt, and on a bad road you have to go much slower, otherwise the car will “crack”. I now go to Nokian at a pressure of 2.4 and there are no such problems at all. Very comfortable. About the extended warranty. I fought long and hard with the store and with Nokian. As a result, Nokian manually activated this guarantee for me, but a lot of time and effort was spent. Now…

Pros
  • Comfortable, quiet, extended warranty.
Cons
  • Difficulties in activating an extended warranty.

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Bad product, not worth the money.

With its pros: I thought no worse than Hakka Green. I bought Hakka Green for several years, there were no problems. Got cons: In fact, a hernia was discovered on one of the 4 tires with a quiet ride a month later. A finger-wide bulge along the sidewall, straight from the rim to the tread.

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Upset and disappointed, the product is very bad!

Tires 21 years old, a new model with a bunch of advertised modern gadgets. And, in fact, the rubber is average with incredibly fast wear. I have been stepping on the Nokian rake many times already . My head is already gray-haired, but the strength of the brand takes precedence over reason. Rubber should wear out with time, but such wear of the rubber mixture does not allow even counting on a mileage of up to 20-25 thousand. And, if you still put it on a powerful machine and anneal it, then 10…

Pros
  • The road is well maintained. Well balanced.
Cons
  • Over 4 thousand km, with an absolutely retired driving style (I put 205/55/16 on my mother’s car), the wear on the front tires is up to 6, on the rear, the figure eight is almost erased. Due to the characteristics of the tread, it actively collects pebbles from the road and you ride as if on spikes.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is at the highest level, be sure to try it.

I have been using these tires for several months, the mileage on these tires is more than 3k kilometers, which I can say is that the tires are very quiet, toyo proxes cf2 was quiet, but these are even quieter, almost inaudible, it stands confidently in the rain (rainstorm), slows down as if rooted to the spot from different speeds on purpose I checked it, it confidently keeps in the lane on the road, it doesn’t float, it’s also completely adequate for demolition, you always keep everything…

Pros
  • Doesn't float, quiet
Cons
  • Not found

Revainrating 4 out of 5

A good product, more pros than cons.

195/65/15 went on almost all premium tires in this segment and in 205. For many years I took tires from the first five tests of car magazines, if you don’t find fault with trifles, this one is definitely no worse. it remains to wait for the rainy season and see the behavior in the puddles and on the wet grass. I have not yet flown into the pits at speeds above 120, at lower speeds the pits and joints pass normally. balanced perfectly. Octavia cars. 95% paved roads of good and acceptable…

Pros
  • the car rulitsya easily and naturally, at high speeds the handling is excellent, rutting does not annoy. Its price is fully consistent.
Cons
  • Indeed, faster than 80, a steady noise begins to appear, but it is not stressful and I think it will go away when the tires are a little rolled and washed. In the urban cycle, no problems at all.

Put the Nokian after 3 years of operation of the Chinese blackroyal with a rigid sidewall (before that, there were Dunlop sp01). I immediately noticed how quieter the tires are than the Chinese, just as quieter as the Dunlop. The car has become softer, small joints are almost invisible on a rigid suspension. On a Chinese with a rigid sidewall and a rigid suspension, I felt the transverse seams in the asphalt as the 5th point. I noticed how the car’s rolling had changed, the car slowed down…

Pros
  • Quiet, soft, economical, good rolling on the car
Cons
  • Soft, as a result, falling into a hole is fraught with a hernia or rupture . Dear in modern times. I bought in the fall of 21g for 28 I didn’t test at high speeds, they say not very much.

Dimension 195/65 R15. The rumble of a tire at a speed of 80 km / h is very tiring. Let's hope that the tire after rolling, about 500 km will be quieter. In terms of management, I liked it, it holds the road well in both dry and wet weather. Excellent braking. ate as of 05/17/21: the hum is gone, the wheel bearings were the reason (I didn't think about them right away, I changed them 15,000 tons ago). Now the tire has become quiet for me, I recommend it for purchase. 5 stars

Pros
  • Handling on dry and wet pavement.
Cons
  • The tire is hard. The main disadvantage is the strong rumble of the tire at a speed of 80 km / h. The hum is gone, the reason was the wheel bearings (I didn’t think about them right away, I changed them 15,000 tons ago)

Revainrating 2 out of 5

I didnt see good quality, solid disadvantages.

I was surprised by the consumption - more than on winter wheels (an electric car and it is very felt) They are erased very quickly, I drove a little more than 1 thousand km and the number 8 completely disappeared. Most likely they will be completely erased in 10 thousand km Noise is average Good grip both dry and wet

drove his new Solaris for one summer season in 2022 on Toyo Proxes SF2 (made in Japan). Shumovannaya machine, wheel arches too. I bought these declared as low-noise well, and a novelty for 3000 / cylinder. I’m reading the first reviews and I’m already pointing . people here interpret that they make unbearable noise ((((While it’s still cool in Togliatti and snow in some places, I don’t risk changing tires. I really hope that Nokia will be quiet, Toyo sold because they were very noisy at speeds…

Pros
  • novelty
Cons
  • only the first reviews of the owners about the noise (((

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great product, best quality.

Impressions in contrast to the ContiPremiumContact 5. 205/55R16. Opel Zafira B. - Here they wrote about the noise. She really buzzes the first kilometers. 30 km on the highway at a speed of 120+ was enough for me, the rumble of the tread was completely gone. The tire is really not noisy (no noisier than CPC5). - Not loud at all. On rough pavement, road noise is significantly lower than on the CPC5. - 94H is very light. - Not jumpy. Bridge junctions are passed without wheel toss (well, you know,

Pros
  • Not noisy Not voiced Light not bouncy
Cons
  • Too early to say