Review

I bought it, installed it (if the drivers were immediately included, I would have put a solid 5) and started using it, now I'm racking my brains about which view scan or native program is better))) the quality is better than that of tablets

I think it's worth the money. For digitization of archive of films - an ideal variant. If anything, I have something to compare with - the experience of scanning negatives I have had it since 1998, my first scanner is the legendary Coolscan LS-2022. Got pros: Speed ​​(nimble). Very good scan quality. Compact. Includes slide calibrator, negative frames and slides. It also comes with a handy high quality carry bag. Even the supplied software (SilverFast) - after the first "fu-fu-fu" - turns out…

Having received the most unflattering impressions of the software, in conjunction with the ill-conceived, creaking working site of the developer, I conclude that this is just such an approach. By the way, surprisingly, I could not find any software that sees this scanner, except for the bundled one. Has pros: Much better scanning quality than Chinese simple scanners. For the price, this is to be expected. With its cons: 1. The main disadvantage is the disgusting software that comes with it…

I bought an affordable machine for digitizing all the archives accumulated over many years of amateur photography - black-and-white negative films, color negative films, slides in frames and in films. The color rendition of negative color films delighted me with its authenticity. A couple of years ago I tried to scan on the HP8200 and abandoned this idea: color negatives after color inversion were killed by their unreliability. I bought it on time - the device disappeared from the market, and…