I really like the comfort and cushioning. And I've also had compliments on the color which goes perfectly with jeans etc.

durable shoes; felt supported, but especially on my left foot, there was a lot of sock-on-soles rubbing and multiple rashes, blisters, and hot spots while running, especially after completing the last 5-6 miles of my long runs (Run the I bought shoes for). I would recommend more for shorter easy runs but after about 8-12 miles they become uncomfortable. It could be a personal issue with my step or something, but it's something to keep in mind.

The shoe provides additional cushioning support without sacrificing weight. I have other shoes that I use for circuit training and such, but these are my running shoes. Absorbs shocks well. Not long ago but durability and overall functionality was the reason I returned to Saucony. These shoes make me stick with it.

Great, comfortable shoes! Be sure to go 1/2 size smaller than usual. I usually wear a 10.5 or 11. Sometimes I squeeze myself into 10s. I ordered 10.5 and they are great for studying/walking because I have wiggle room. On the other hand, I need 10 to run.

Sad company. The first pair broke up in less than a year, trying to replace it. The first substitute was wrong in turn, the second. The size was too small even though the label had the correct number. At that point the company refused to help me and I ended up donating the shoes.

These are very comfortable shoes, from the moment you put them on you will know that these shoes are very comfortable. Walking in them is a different story. I'm a big runner, I run 5+ miles every day and run 10+ miles a day and week. So I decided to buy these shoes for my longer runs. I didn't get two miles in them on my first run, they were very uncomfortable and made my feet very hot. I wasn't expecting much as it was my first run and I knew I had to run them. I've driven them about 25 miles…

Fits perfectly if you have a narrow foot, I would suggest a wide fit if you are not narrow. Big guy, your shins will thank you.

Coming back to Saucony after a horrible experience with the Hoka all I found was horrible blisters and knee pain from this shoe. The Triumph was a dream come true, very comfortable with a cushion, stable, with a good fit if a bit slow. Why a star? His soles are half a size too small and it doesn't make sense for me to send them back abroad (shipping costs). I tried just sending the soles to myself but couldn't find that option on ebay. I hope Saucony reads this and takes pity on me and sends me

I ordered this hiking shoe based on a detailed review in Sole Review that said the Triumph 17 is well cushioned for a plush feel. My foot is 29cm (rounded up) so I ordered a size 11.5 based on the Saucony size chart for 29.5cm (add 1 or 2 sizes to make room for the toes). Their standard width is the ideal width D. It should also be noted that these shoes were designed for both neutral and underpronation. If you tend to overpronate, you might want to choose a different shoe. Will I buy these…

They have been serving me for almost two years! After so much use, part of the rear left boot was rubbing against my skin, but a dab of tape fixed that. :) Great for hiking!

I have bought Triumph over several generations. They usually wear out in a predictable way: either my big toes break through the toe box (should probably clip my toenails more often) or the inner healing pad starts to tear/fall apart. After 6-9 months, it's time to replace them. With this pair I ran more than before (3-5 miles a day, 7 days a week) and it was all outdoors (mostly road/sidewalk). I've put about 370 miles on this pair based on tracking. I noticed today that they were leaking when

As a player who plays in heels, I am impressed with the cushioning in the heel of the shoe. This makes walking much more comfortable. There is also plenty of padding in the midfoot. More than any running shoe I've ever owned and there have been many. My ankles and knees hurt less after running than other brands I own. My feet love these shoes!

I love the cushion in this shoe. The main thing that didn't fit me so well was the width of the shoe. They are not a narrow size (just a wider size) and I've found my foot doesn't stay well on my feet when running. To be honest I have a rather narrow foot but this one seems wider than most. Not the best arch support either.

The best running shoes! Don't wear any other shoes. Slightly heavier than most but makes up for it in comfort and responsiveness. Like bouncing off the ground, plus great traction.

There isn't enough support on the sides of the shoe and the shoe itself is very foamy and has stubble and lateral stability. I put them on and nearly sprained my ankle right away. You have to tie them very tightly to even walk in them. There is no bow support at all. I am 6ft 3ft, 250lbs, flat feet, 29 years old, active male. I returned them.

+5 = Best Saucony Triumph yet: light, soft sole, great laces, great for running. -3 = Made in a country that seems to have an ongoing slave labor problem and they still charge $90 a pair. Total = +1

I'm not a runner I'm a serious road cyclist who puts in a lot of miles every week. As a result, my feet usually hurt a lot and my heels and soles are often sensitive. So I started looking for super comfortable, light "sneakers”. After extensive internet research and trying on 10 different brands, these stood out the most - felt the best in terms of overall comfort and support. Note that the Triumph 17 is a completely different build to previous versions and is relatively new, so you won't find…

I was very excited to try them as I was a big fan of the early Saucony models. The cushioning is very soft and comfortable, as is the shoe in general. I couldn't wait to take them running. After a few runs, the sizing of this shoe became a big issue. I have had several pairs of size 10.5 Saucony shoes before and the size 10.5 in this model has a full inch in the toe of the shoe. Since both the Revains page and the Saucony website recommended the right size, I still took them for a run and now I

Not a runner so I can't tell you about this performance. My first Saucony was a Triumph 11 in 2013. I have not worn anything other than the Saucony since for the fit and comfort. I always wore the same size and D-width, which gave me extra width to accommodate the neuroma and spur. I think the reason for the drastic fit change is the soft, springy PowerRun material in the outsole; As a neutral shoe, this softness would have allowed for too much instability on the old platform. (If you've worn…

Have been buying Sauconys for a long time. They fit me better than most and have plenty of cushioning for running. This is the first time I've tried a "high-end" model. They are very soft - more so than most Sauconys - and feel "bouncy" on the pavement. The fit was a little tight, even at my usual 11 watts. This was an issue initially, but the material that makes up this shoe, unlike other Sauconys I've purchased, is quite stretchy and "stretchy" and seems to "conform" to my feet. There is also