📷 Optimized for SEO: Tamron SP 70-200MM F/2.8 DI VC USD Telephoto Zoom Lens for Nikon (FX) Cameras Review

I chose between canon 70-200 2.8 They were frightened by a non-working f / 2.8 Works great previously on Canon 600D crop and now on Canon 5DM4 I use it as my main everyday lens.

I am pleased with the overall performance of this lens. Use it on the Canon 5D Mark III body. Focusing is quick. Bought for a used price of 1 with a 3 year international Mac warranty. This is better than buying a new lens as the lens was actually unopened and still in the box. The $500 price difference is for the 3-year US 1-year international warranty only. manufacturer guarantee. Before buying, I read reviews and analysis comparing Canon 70-200 IS ii f/2.8 lenses. Tamron's 4-speed reduction…

UPDATE: There was a problem with the lens and I had to send it to Tamron for warranty repair. GREAT customer service experience. The repair was quick. I sent it to them with UPS slow shipping and got it back 10 days later. Better experience than Nikon customer service. I am very happy that I bought this lens! The autofocus with it on my D750 is quiet and fast. It's so fast it's hard to tell if it's even focused! As if nothing had happened. Now this is my fastest focusing lens. I find that the…

About me: I consider myself a well-read enthusiast with the budget to revive an old hobby from the 35mm darkroom days. I bought this lens after reading and seeing many recommendations for this particular 70-200mm format also available from Nikon, Canon and Sigma. According to other reviews, Tamron does not lag behind analogues from Nikon or Canon, it is better than Sigma and cheaper than the first two manufacturers mentioned above. So, while I can't compare, my observations are as follows: All…

Are you all wondering if this lens is really as good as they say it is? Better. I'm a professional who uses my lenses on a daily basis. I expect and demand a lot from them. I'm not a brand whore and I don't justify the price just because of the label. If I've learned one thing though, it's that sometimes saving can cost $$ money. And if there's ever a product area where that's true, it's lenses. I've spent a lot of time shooting with both the Canon 70-200 f/2.8 Mark II and the Tamron SP 70-200…

I won't go into the properties because to be honest, many here don't care and they don't understand. That's what DPReview and DXOMark are for. I shoot 6A high school sports like football, basketball, baseball and lacrosse and bought this lens shortly after it was released on the recommendation of my local Tamron Midwest rep (whom I met at one of the games I was shooting). I used to rent a Canon 70-200 f/2.8 Mk I and then II. While they produced amazing results (the Mark II version in…

That is, the “hole” in Tamron is formally f2.8, but either this is the design of the lenses, or the lens is too contrasty (its pattern is much more contrast than that of the Sigma), the output image is darker than the standard one at f2.8. That is, in fact we have not f2.8, but somewhere f3.2-3.5. Surprise awaited me when I contacted the Tamron office in Hong Kong. When I asked what converters this lens works with, they answered, theoretically, “that it should work with 2x and 1,4x” (I don’t…

a lens from the MUST HAVE category - in terms of picture and reliability, a competitor to the Nikkor 70-200 Af-s VR II, which is much more expensive and no better - tested = I know. now for a low price it is being poured into avito - at very reasonable prices, so I recommend it. since 2014, no complaints about work and reliability - 5 seasons of fashion week in Moscow have passed, dozens of weddings and corporate parties - everything is just gorgeous. I don’t see the point in selling (this is…